LWJune 10 Exams POLL Paper F4 was Post your comments here

tell me what how should we solve the last three Questons. i mean some people say that only write what is asks from you . like if it requires you to tell that whether the partner was liable for his THAT ACT or not?? so should we write WHOLE liabilties of partner or just write that yes he was liable for that act becz that act was the breach of a PARTICULAR DUTY.. DO reply on that should we write whole damn topic in the answer of just write what he askd.

@mrxamag said:
It's not only you .. people have done some crazy things in f4 exam!! lets wait till 23 August :D

Too true :(

Thankyou Open Tuition:-) You people are a good help:-)
look forward to study more from you:-)

The paper was good:-)

Q1,2,3,4,5,6,7 were quite simple as they were straight forward questions. For those who read those parts and remembered them well in the exam hall, they will serve as easy marks. I had problem with question 4 though cuz partnership and company law were actually difficult for me to digest whille reading.
Q8, though a scenario question was easy I think, if it was actually about consideration.
Q9 was about implied authority of partners while Q10 was just confusing.
Looking at the paper generally, I think it was fair enough for a well prepared student.

Ooops. I spoke about promissory estoppel in question 8! I basically argued that PE applied because she had gone back on her promise to pay. However because PE is a shield not a sword, neither had a case, but the 2nd guy had more of a case because she wasn't offering it to him under duress.

those exam tips were very helpful thanks OT!!!:)

I was able to solve first seven question but 8,9,10 were hard n confusing....don't think will be pass by solving 7 question and touching 9,10.

The paper was easy, but the scenario's were in too depth.

for MYS F4, the last question was on Capital Maintenance and Dividend Law. some parts of the question were beyond syllabus (?) examiner asked "can holding company utilise subsidiary co's profit to distribute dividend?" "if in the next year holding co makes profit, can holding co. distribute dividend without writing off previous loss?" "can holding co. distribute dividend using share premium?"

i could not find answers for these questions in BPP textbook. juz hope the marker can understand my arguments and give me some marks

I think it was on alteration of articles, because if the take over bid was bonafide in favour of the company as a whole and as well individuals.
Brwon vs british abrasive steel case.

i forgot to mark the questions attempted on the front page of answerbook lit!! : (
Now what will happen?????

@admin said:
yeah, let’s see
it is tooooooo early to give us credit haha
goood luck anyway

lets see till 23aug, good news for sure ;)

The paper was fair enough for well prepared man to get pass marks......I am fairly sure and hoping that i would get pass.....InshaAllah...:)

over all paper was fine but what about q3 does it require to write about breach of duty of care, i have only wrote about the duty of care along with the three standards which were established to check that is there a duty of care in a particular situation,how much marks can be lost in this q and in q2a i wrote def of offer and three more things that should be distingished from offer how much marks can be gained any idea and was example necessary in tjis part.

i

@mrxamag said:
no it wasnt... it was on donoghue v stevenson case.. although duty of care in professional situation cud've been mentioned

I may be wrong but I think the cases for the question on tort with breach of duty of care were Ploemis & Furness, Whity & Co 1921 and The Wagon Mound No. 1 1961

Pls let me know if I am wrong

Please tell me which one is harder: F4 (ENG) or F4 (GLO)?
Thanks

OP‘s tips is so great~And amazing~Thanks for all of you~

@asmahmazlan said:
Questions were okay... Only didn't revise for secretaries duties under Corp gov n shares allotment.damn!

Hope for 50%+++..fingers
cross!xxxxx

'secretaries duties' is in the tips of OP
U cannot miss it
anyway, hope u pass

I reckon q10 was linked to corporate governance and breach of fiduciary duties.

hi every one
could anyone please tell me how was f4 global exam this time
thanks

i guess q9 can be argue in many ways, its how you justify

The paper was ok. It was easier than some of the past papers. A few questions were tricky though. I'm hoping for atleast 60%.

I am planning to take F4 on December. How much do I need to study in order to pass?

F4, F4, F4, Please someone pray for me. I did not do question 9. I hope to pass by
God's favour. It was by baptism paper to the ACCA exams.

Paper was fairly okay provided you have gone through past exams papers. Unilateral contracts ???? Has someone heard of the famous Carlill v/s Carbolic smokeballs ?

I hope for 50%.. INSHAALLAH i will get it

Not that bad!because i spend lots at F4,leading disaster of my F7~~ei~~

f4 was not bad atall so we hope for the best and thanks to ot

f4 was not bad atall so we hope for the best and thanks to ot