Skip to contentSkip to search

Accounting for product costs

1 Introduction

This chapter looks at how products are costed, depending on whether they are unique products or one of many identical products.

2 Job costing

Job costing is where a unique item is being made and costs can be specifically traced into that item.

The job could be large (such as building a house or a ship) or small (such as constructing a set of shelving for a room).

Often jobs are given identifying numbers, such as contract numbers or simply job numbers.

All relevant costs are labelled with that number and the total costs can be accumulated.

  • Material costs: either invoices for specially bought material or requisitions from stores can be labelled with the job number so that material costs can be accounted for.

  • Labour costs: time sheets can be filled in using the job number to track time spent on the job.

  • Other expenses: if direct, then the job number will be noted against that cost; if indirect then expenses are often charged to a job on the basis of time and an overhead absorption rate.

Job 666 required 20 kgs of a material in stores which cost $15/kg, and also a special component had to be bought at a cost of $150.

30 hours labour were spent on the job where the employees were paid at $9/hour. In addition 3 hours was spent by a supervisor who is paid at $15/hour. Overheads are absorbed at the rate of $4/labour hour.

Calculate the total absorption cost of the job.

Show answerHide answer

Example 1

Job 666

Quantity

Unit price

$

$

Material   – stores

20

15

300

    – special

1

150

150

Labour     – basic

30

9

270

    – supervisor

3

15

45

Overheads

33

4

132

Total

897

Where prime cost is given, add absorbed production overhead to it. Do not add direct labour again unless the question explicitly says it is excluded from the stated prime cost.

3 Batch costing

In batch costing several identical items are produced as a batch. Each batch will be given a number so that costs can be traced into the batch. The batch costs can be averaged over the units produced.

Batch 7777 used 2000 kgs of a material in stores which cost $10/kg, and also 500 kgs of special material that was bought in at $4/kg.

90 hours labour were spent in Department A where the employees were paid at $12/hour, and 40 hours were spent in department B where employees are paid at $10/hour. Overheads are absorbed at the rate of $3/labour hour.

900 units were produced

Calculate the total absorption cost of the batch and each unit produced.

Show answerHide answer

Example 2

Batch 7777

Quantity

Unit price

$

$

Material   – stores

2,000

10

20,000

    – special

500

4

2,000

Labour     – Dept A

90

12

1,080

    – Dept B

40

10

400

Overheads

130

3

390

Total for the batch

23,870

Cost per unit made in batch 7777 = 23870/900 = $26.52

4 Process costing - introduction

Process costing deals with manufacturing that takes place as a continuous process.

Examples of industries using process costing are:

  • Oil refining

  • Chemical works

Because work carries on continuously, there are no batches as creating a batch implies that you know when it starts and stops, and therefore what costs have gone into it.

In process costing, costs are worked out for periods: measure the costs that are used in a period and the output produced in the period and you have a way of working out the cost per unit.

Costs for July:

  • Material costs = 100,000 units costing $20,000

  • Labour costs = $10,000

  • Overheads = $5,000

  • Output produced in July = 100,000 units

Cost per unit = ($20,000 + $10,000 + $5,000)/100,000 = $0.35/unit

In a process account this would be

Process account

Units

$

Units

$

Material

100,000

20,000

To finished goods

100,000 @
$ 0.35

35,000

Labour

10,000

Overheads

5,000

100,000

35,000

100,000

35,000

Process costing – with losses

Many processes incur losses which are inevitable. For example, liquids evaporate or solids are filtered out. Therefore, the units of good output are often not the same as the units input.

Losses are of two kinds. A NORMAL loss is the loss the process is expected to suffer — it is unavoidable, so its cost is treated as part of the cost of the good output. An ABNORMAL loss (or gain) is the difference between the loss that was expected and the loss that actually happened, and it is NOT part of the cost of good output: it is written off, or credited, separately, so that management can see it.

If you can’t make units without some losses, then the cost of that loss is spread over (or absorbed) into the good units produced. The loss is just another cost on the way to good production.

Use job costing for separately identifiable customer jobs, batch costing for a group of identical units, and process costing for continuous homogeneous output through stages. At MA1, focus process-loss questions on identifying normal versus abnormal loss or gain—not equivalent-unit calculations.

Cost/unit = costs for the period/expected good output for the period

1000 kgs at $3.60/kg were input to a process and there was a 10% loss due to evaporation.

900 good units should result and their cost per unit would be:

1000 x $3.60/900 = $4/unit.

Sometimes the ‘lost’ material can be sold as scrap. For example, in a saw-mill, sawdust can be sold for various uses.

1,000 kgs at $4.00/kg were input to a process and there was a 20% loss due to filtration. The materials filtered out could be sold for $0.50/kg.

If the good units can’t be made without making some losses, it is reasonable to say that the initial cost will always be reduced by what the scrapped/lost units can be sold for.

800 good units should result and their cost per unit would be:

(1,000 x 4 – 200 x 0.50)/800 = $4.875/unit

In a ‘T’ account this would be shown as:

Process account

Units

$

Units

$

Material

1,000

4,000

Normal loss

200 @
$0.50

100

To finished goods

800 @
$4.875

3,900

1,000

4,000

1,000

4,000

5 Abnormal losses and abnormal gains

The cost per unit of good output is ALWAYS worked out on the EXPECTED good output, and the normal loss is always valued at its scrap value (nil if it has none). Nothing about that changes when the actual result is different. What changes is that the process account will not balance on units, and the difference is the abnormal loss or abnormal gain.

  • Abnormal loss: actual good output is LESS than expected. The shortfall is valued at the same cost per unit as good output and carried to an abnormal loss account, which is written off to profit or loss at the end of the period.

  • Abnormal gain: actual good output is MORE than expected. The excess is valued at the same cost per unit and carried to an abnormal gain account, which is credited to profit or loss.

Note the point students most often get wrong: the normal loss is still recorded at its full expected quantity, even when the actual loss was smaller. An abnormal gain therefore also carries the scrap income that was expected but never earned, which is why the abnormal gain account is debited with that scrap value.

Abnormal loss

1,000 kgs at $4.00/kg are input to a process. A 20% loss is normal and the lost material sells for $0.50/kg. In the period only 750 good units were produced.

Cost per unit is unchanged: (1,000 x 4 – 200 x 0.50)/800 = $4.875/unit.

Expected good output 800; actual 750; abnormal loss 50 units @ $4.875 = $244.

Process account

$

$

Material

1,000

4,000

Normal loss 200 @ $0.50

200

100

To finished goods 750 @ $4.875

750

3,656

Abnormal loss 50 @ $4.875

50

244

1,000

4,000

1,000

4,000

The $244 is written off to profit or loss.

Abnormal gain

Same process, but 820 good units were produced.

Expected good output 800; actual 820; abnormal gain 20 units @ $4.875 = $98.

Process account

$

$

Material

1,000

4,000

Normal loss 200 @ $0.50

200

100

Abnormal gain 20 @ $4.875

20

98

To finished goods 820 @ $4.875

820

3,998

1,020

4,098

1,020

4,098

The abnormal gain account is credited with $98 and debited with the scrap that was expected on those 20 units but never earned (20 @ $0.50 = $10), so $88 is credited to profit or loss.

Practice question

3,000 kg are input to a process and total costs amount to $9,000. 100 units are expected to be lost and can be sold for $1 each. What is the cost per unit of good output?

In August 2000 kgs of a material were introduced to a process at a cost of $5/kg, and 200 hours labour were spent at a cost of $12/hour. Overheads are absorbed at the rate of $3/labour hour.

Normal losses are incurred at the rate of 5% of input and lost units can be sold for $0.8 per kilogram

1,900 units were produced

Calculate the total absorption cost of the good output and also show the process account.

Show answerHide answer

Example 3

Input costs less sale of normal loss =

2,000 x $5 + 200 x $12 + 200 x 3 – 100 x 0.8 = 12,920

Expected output = 2,000 x 0.95 = 1,900

Cost per unit = $6.80

Process account

Units

$

Units

$

Material

2,000

10,000

To finished goods

1,900
@ 6.80

12,920

Labour

2,400

Sale of scrap (cash)

100
@ 0.8

80

Overheads

600

2,000

13,000

2,000

13,000

3,000 kgs of material costing $2.40/kg are input to a process. Labour and overheads add $1,800. A normal loss of 10% is expected and lost material can be sold for $1.00/kg. Actual good output was 2,640 kgs.

Calculate the cost per unit of good output, and show the process account.

Show answerHide answer

Example 4

Expected good output = 3,000 x 90% = 2,700 kgs. Normal loss = 300 kgs, scrap value 300 x $1.00 = $300.

Total cost = 3,000 x $2.40 + $1,800 = $9,000.

Cost per unit = ($9,000 – $300)/2,700 = $8,700/2,700 = $3.222/kg.

Actual good output 2,640, so abnormal loss = 2,700 – 2,640 = 60 kgs @ $3.222 = $193.

Process account

$

$

Material 3,000 @ $2.40

3,000

7,200

Normal loss 300 @ $1.00

300

300

Labour and overheads

1,800

To finished goods 2,640 @ $3.222

2,640

8,507

Abnormal loss 60 @ $3.222

60

193

3,000

9,000

3,000

9,000

Practice questions

Product Costs

10 questions

Answer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.

Open chapter practice