Skip to contentSkip to search

Equity Finance

CIMA Free Mock Exam
CIMA-F3 · Chapter 6
  1. Equity Finance

1 Introduction

This chapter evaluates the ways an entity raises equity finance, and what each of them means for the people running the entity and for the people who already own it.

There are two distinct situations, and the syllabus asks about both. An unquoted entity that wants access to the public equity markets has first to get there — that is a flotation, and section 2 deals with the methods and their consequences. An entity that is already quoted has a wider and cheaper set of choices, of which the rights issue is the most important and the most examinable; sections 3 and 4 deal with those, including the calculation of the theoretical ex-rights price (TERP) and the yield-adjusted TERP.

2 Flotation

A flotation, or initial public offering, is the process by which an entity's shares are admitted to trading on a stock exchange for the first time.

2.1 Why float, and why not

Reasons to float

Reasons not to

Access to a far larger pool of equity, now and in future rights issues.

The cost. Fees to the sponsor, the broker, the reporting accountants and the lawyers, plus underwriting commission, typically absorb a material percentage of the money raised, and much of it is payable whether or not the issue succeeds.

A market in the shares, so that existing shareholders can realise part or all of their investment at an objective price.

Loss of control. The founders' proportionate holding falls, decisions become answerable to outside shareholders, and the entity becomes capable of being taken over against the board's wishes.

Quoted shares are a currency for acquisitions — a share-for-share offer is only credible if the shares have a price.

Continuing obligations: periodic reporting, immediate disclosure of price-sensitive information, governance requirements, and restrictions on dealing by directors.

A daily, objective valuation, which matters for tax, for estates and for employee share schemes.

Exposure to short-term market pressure, and to a share price that moves for reasons that have nothing to do with the entity.

Profile, which helps with customers, suppliers and recruitment.

Management time — first on the process, and thereafter permanently on investor relations.

2.2 The methods of flotation

Method

How it works

When it is used

Offer for sale at a fixed price

Shares are offered to the general public at a price fixed in advance and set out in the offering document. The offer is normally underwritten.

Large issues where a wide shareholder base is wanted. The most expensive method, and the one where getting the price right is hardest.

Offer for sale by tender

The public are invited to bid, stating a price and a quantity. A striking price is then set at the level that sells the issue, and all successful applicants pay it.

Where the value is genuinely uncertain and the entity does not want to leave money on the table. Deters small investors, who dislike having to name a price.

Placing

A sponsor arranges for the shares to be bought by a limited number of its institutional clients rather than offered to the public.

Smaller issues. Much cheaper and quicker than a public offer, but it concentrates the shareholder register rather than widening it, and the exchange may require a minimum proportion to be made available more widely.

Introduction

The shares already in issue are simply admitted to trading. No new shares are issued and no money is raised.

Where the shares are already widely held — for example after a demerger, or for an entity already listed elsewhere. The cheapest method by a distance, because there is no offer to market and nothing to underwrite.

Only the first three raise money. An introduction creates a market in shares that already exist; it raises nothing. That single distinction answers most examination questions on choosing between the methods.

2.3 The process and the parties

  • Sponsor or nominated adviser — guides the entity through the exchange's rules and confirms to the exchange that it is suitable to be listed.

  • Broker or bookrunner — markets the issue to investors and, on a book-built offer, collects the indications of demand from which the price is set.

  • Reporting accountants — report on the historical financial record and on whether the entity has sufficient working capital for a stated period after the flotation.

  • Lawyers — verify the statements made in the offering document (in many regimes a prospectus), on which the directors take personal responsibility and on which investors are entitled to rely.

  • Underwriters — agree, for a commission, to take up any shares not taken by investors. Underwriting converts an uncertain amount of money into a certain one; the commission is the price of that certainty and is payable whether or not the underwriters are called on.

Exchanges also impose entry requirements — typically a minimum market capitalisation, an audited trading record of some years, a minimum proportion of the shares in public hands (the free float), and continuing disclosure obligations. The specific thresholds differ from exchange to exchange and from market tier to market tier, and are not examinable; that the requirements exist, and that they are lighter on a growth market than on a main market, is.

2.4 The implications for management

  • control is diluted, and permanently: decisions have to be justified to outside shareholders, and the entity becomes vulnerable to a takeover it does not want;

  • management is measured continuously by a share price, which creates pressure towards decisions that flatter the near term;

  • the continuing obligations are real work — reporting timetables, disclosure of price-sensitive information, governance codes, and restrictions on when directors may deal in their own shares;

  • against that, management gains a currency for acquisitions, a means of incentivising staff with shares that have a value, and access to equity on a scale a private entity cannot reach.

2.5 The implications for shareholders

  • existing shareholders get what they usually floated for — a market, a price, and a route to sell, though lock-in agreements normally prevent the founders selling for a period after admission;

  • their percentage holding falls if new shares are issued, and their influence falls further than the percentage suggests once the register is widened;

  • if the issue is underpriced, value moves from the existing shareholders to the new ones. That is not a small point and it is examined numerically — see Example 2;

  • new shareholders acquire a liquid, objectively valued holding with continuing information rights, and the ability to sell at any time, which is what they are paying the flotation premium for.

Choosing a method of flotation

An unquoted company wishes to obtain a listing. Its shares are already held by several hundred investors, it does not need to raise any new money, and it wants the process to cost as little as possible.

Which one of the following methods of flotation is most appropriate?

  1. An offer for sale at a fixed price

  2. An offer for sale by tender

  3. A placing

  4. An introduction

Show answerHide answer

Choosing a method of flotation

(d) An introduction.

An introduction admits existing shares to trading without issuing any new ones and therefore raises no money — which is exactly what this company wants. It is available because the shares are already widely enough held to satisfy the exchange's free-float requirement, and it is the cheapest method precisely because there is no offer to market and nothing to underwrite.

  • (a) and (b) both offer shares to the public in order to raise money the company does not need, and both are the most expensive routes.

  • (c) a placing raises money from a small number of institutions. It is cheap relative to a public offer, but it still issues shares, and it concentrates the register rather than using the wide holding the company already has.

3 Further issues by an entity that is already quoted

The first of this chapter’s five recordings covers the methods of issue.

New share issues (public issue): its closing summary contradicts itself about which shareholders get the gain — Section 4.2 works it. The rounding in its example is resolved in these notes: $3,090,909 and $409,091 against the $3.5m net present value.

Flotation is notes-only: the recordings touch on becoming listed only in passing, so read Section 2 for the methods of flotation and what they mean for management and shareholders. The fifth recording, on unquoted entities, bonus issues and scrip dividends, is with Section 5.

YouTube video

Once an entity is listed, the following methods are available for issuing new shares.

3.1 Public issue (offer for subscription)

A sale direct to the general public. The shares are advertised at a fixed offer price and the public are invited to buy them. In practice it is difficult to set a fixed offer price that satisfies both the existing and the new shareholders, and Example 2 shows why: the price determines how the value created by whatever the money is spent on is divided between them.

3.2 Public offer for sale by tender

A sale direct to the general public, but with no fixed price: the public are invited to bid, and a striking price is set at the level that clears the issue. It transfers the pricing problem to the market, at the cost of deterring investors who do not want to name a price.

3.3 Placing

A sponsor, usually an investment bank, arranges for its institutional clients to buy the shares. It is quick and cheap. Exchanges commonly require a proportion of a placing to be made available more widely, so that the free float is maintained.

3.4 Rights issue

An offer to existing shareholders to buy new shares in proportion to their existing shareholdings. It is dealt with in section 4, because it is the method that generates the calculations.

New share issues and pricing

A company has 10 million shares in issue at $2.50 each and is looking to raise an additional $2.4 million by an issue of new shares, to fund a project with a net present value of $3.5 million.

Required

  1. Calculate the gains accruing to the new and to the existing shareholders if the shares are issued at $2.40 each.

  2. Calculate the issue price at which all of the gain would go to the existing shareholders.

Show answerHide answer

New share issues and pricing

(a) Issue price $2.40

Number of new shares = $2,400,000 ÷ $2.40 = 1,000,000.

The value of the company after the issue is what it was worth, plus the cash raised, plus the value the project creates:

Existing market value: 10,000,000 × $2.50

$25,000,000

Cash raised

$2,400,000

Net present value of the project

$3,500,000

Value after the issue

$30,900,000

Shares in issue afterwards

11,000,000

Price per share afterwards

$2.8091

Shareholders

Shares

Paid

Worth after

Gain per share

Total gain

Existing

10,000,000

$2.5000

$2.8091

$0.3091

$3,090,909

New

1,000,000

$2.4000

$2.8091

$0.4091

$409,091

Total

11,000,000

$3,500,000

The two gains must add up to the net present value of the project, because the project is the only thing that has created any value — the cash raised is worth exactly what was paid for it. That check is the quickest way to know the answer is right, and it only works on the unrounded figures: rounding the price to $2.81 gives gains of $3,100,000 and $410,000, which total $3,510,000 and therefore cannot both be correct.

Issuing at a discount to the existing market price has handed $409,091 of the project's value to the new shareholders.

(b) All of the gain to the existing shareholders

The existing shareholders keep the whole $3.5 million only if the price after the issue is:

$2.50 + ($3,500,000 ÷ 10,000,000) = $2.85

and the new shares therefore have to be issued at that same $2.85, so that the new shareholders pay exactly what they get:

Shareholders

Shares

Paid

Worth after

Gain

Existing

10,000,000

$2.50

$2.85

$3,500,000

New

842,105

$2.85

$2.85

–

Number of new shares = $2,400,000 ÷ $2.85 = 842,105. Checking: total value $30,900,000 ÷ 10,842,105 shares = $2.85, as required.

The general point is the one that makes a rights issue attractive. Any issue to new investors at less than the post-issue value transfers wealth out of the existing shareholders' pockets. A rights issue avoids the problem entirely, because the existing shareholders are the new investors.

4 Rights issues

New share issues (rights issue and other issues): it works the rights example on the question’s own $3.00 issue price and reaches a theoretical ex-rights price of $4.60 and a right worth $1.60.

Three notices: it says “the price has gone up”: the share price falls from $5.00 to $4.60 — it is the size of the holding that goes up. Its account of sponsors, merchant banks and underwriting is wrong in three places and never uses the word underwriting; Section 2.3 is the one to read. And its free-float figure is dated.

YouTube video

A rights issue is an offer to existing shareholders to subscribe for new shares in proportion to their existing holdings — a 1-for-4 issue offers one new share for every four held.

The shares are offered at a price below the current market value (the cum-rights price). The discount is not a gift; it is protection. The offer stays open for some weeks, and if the market price fell below the issue price during that period nobody would take up the offer and the issue would fail. A deep discount makes that outcome very unlikely, which is why a company that wants certainty of proceeds discounts heavily rather than underwriting heavily.

The discount does not by itself make shareholders better or worse off. Because more shares now exist and they have been sold below the market price, the value of every share in issue falls to a weighted average of the old price and the issue price. That weighted average is the theoretical ex-rights price.

4.1 The theoretical ex-rights price

TERP = 1 ÷ (N + 1) × [(N × cum-rights price) + issue price]

where N is the number of existing shares needed to obtain one new share — 4 in a 1-for-4 issue, 3 in a 1-for-3. It is easier, and less error-prone, to lay the same calculation out as a small table, which is what the answers below do.

TERP

A company's current share price is $5.00 a share and it makes a 1-for-4 rights issue at $3.00 a share.

Required

  1. Calculate the theoretical ex-rights price per share.

  2. Calculate the value of a right.

Show answerHide answer

TERP

(a) Theoretical ex-rights price

Held

4 shares

at $5.00

$20.00

Taken up

1 share

at $3.00

$3.00

5 shares

$23.00

TERP = $23.00 ÷ 5 = $4.60

(b) The value of a right

A right is the right to buy one new share at $3.00 when it will be worth $4.60:

$4.60 − $3.00 = $1.60

That is the value of the right to one new share. A shareholder who owns four existing shares receives one such right, so the value of the right attaching to each existing share is $1.60 ÷ 4 = $0.40. Read the requirement carefully: examiners ask for both, and they are different numbers.

4.2 The effect on shareholder wealth

One short recording works the example below, and its figures agree with the answer.

TERP and impact on shareholder wealth: it reaches a theoretical ex-rights price of $7.50, a right worth $1.50, and wealth of $9,600 both before and after for the holder of 1,200 shares. Where it calls the $1.50 “the increase in wealth”, read “the value of a right”: the change in wealth is nil, as the same recording goes on to show.

YouTube video

A shareholder in a rights issue has three choices: take up the rights, sell the rights, or do nothing. The first two leave wealth unchanged. The third destroys it, by exactly the value of the rights that were thrown away.

TERP and the impact on shareholder wealth

The current share price is $8.00 a share. The company makes a rights issue of 1 for 3 at $6.00 a share.

Required

  1. Calculate the ex-rights market value.

  2. Calculate the value of a right.

  3. Calculate the change in wealth of Mrs X, who owns 1,200 shares, assuming she takes up half her rights and sells the other half.

Show answerHide answer

TERP and the impact on shareholder wealth

(a) Ex-rights market value

Held

3 shares

at $8.00

$24.00

Taken up

1 share

at $6.00

$6.00

4 shares

$30.00

TERP = $30.00 ÷ 4 = $7.50

(b) The value of a right: $7.50 − $6.00 = $1.50 per new share, or $0.50 per existing share held.

(c) Mrs X

Mrs X holds 1,200 shares, so she is offered 1,200 ÷ 3 = 400 new shares. She takes up 200 and sells the rights to the other 200.

Wealth before: 1,200 shares × $8.00

$9,600

Shares held afterwards: (1,200 + 200) × $7.50

$10,500

Less cash subscribed: 200 × $6.00

(1,200)

Add proceeds of selling 200 rights: 200 × $1.50

300

Wealth afterwards

$9,600

The change in wealth is nil. That is the point of the calculation, and it holds whatever split she chooses between taking up and selling — provided she does one or the other. A shareholder who does nothing at all ends up with 1,200 shares worth $7.50, that is $9,000, and has lost the $600 the rights were worth.

4.3 The yield-adjusted theoretical ex-rights price

Yield adjusted theoretical ex-rights price: the authority on the denominator. It computes 0.14 ÷ 0.12 × 2.025 = $2.2725. Notice: the adjustment rule is stated backwards twice before the tutor self-corrects on tape, and the rounding is shrugged off. Take the rule from this section, not from the first statement of it on the recording.

YouTube video

The ordinary TERP assumes the money raised earns exactly what the entity's existing funds earn, so that the new shares are worth the same as the old ones. Where the money is going into something expected to earn a different return, the new shares are not equivalent to the old ones and the calculation is weighted to reflect it:

Yield-adjusted TERP = 1 ÷ (N + 1) × [(N × cum-rights price) + (issue price × Ynew ÷ Yold)]

Yold is the return the entity's existing funds generate — its weighted average cost of capital, or whatever the question calls the current return. Ynew is the return expected on the money being raised.

Neither of them is the rights discount. A question that offers shares “at a discount of 10% to the current share price” has given you the issue price, not a yield. Using the discount percentage as Yold produces a number that looks plausible and is wrong.

Yield-adjusted theoretical ex-rights price

A company has the following information available:

  • weighted average cost of capital of 12%

  • corporate income tax rate of 30%

  • 250 million $1 ordinary shares in issue

  • current share price of $2.25

The company announces a 1-for-4 rights issue at a discount of 10% to the current share price. The funds raised will finance a project with an expected return of 14%.

Required

  1. Calculate the funds that will be raised.

  2. Calculate the theoretical ex-rights price, ignoring the return on the new funds.

  3. Calculate the yield-adjusted theoretical ex-rights price.

Show answerHide answer

Yield-adjusted theoretical ex-rights price

(a) Funds raised

Issue price = $2.25 × 90% = $2.025.

New shares = 250,000,000 ÷ 4 = 62,500,000.

Funds raised = 62,500,000 × $2.025 = $126,562,500.

(b) Theoretical ex-rights price

Held

4 shares

at $2.250

$9.000

Taken up

1 share

at $2.025

$2.025

5 shares

$11.025

TERP = $11.025 ÷ 5 = $2.205.

(c) Yield-adjusted theoretical ex-rights price

The new money is expected to earn 14% where the existing funds earn the weighted average cost of capital of 12%, so the new share is weighted by 0.14 ÷ 0.12:

Shares

Price

Value

Yield factor

Adjusted

Held

4

$2.250

$9.000

–

$9.0000

Taken up

1

$2.025

$2.025

0.14 / 0.12

$2.3625

5

$11.3625

Yield-adjusted TERP = $11.3625 ÷ 5 = $2.2725

So the yield adjustment lifts the theoretical price from $2.205 to $2.2725, a gain of 6.75 cents a share, because the money raised is expected to earn more than the company's cost of capital. If the project earned exactly 12% the factor would be 1 and the two prices would be identical; if it earned less than 12% the yield-adjusted price would be below the ordinary TERP.

The corporate income tax rate of 30% is not needed for any part of this question. Questions of this type routinely carry a rate that is not used, and picking the wrong percentage out of the data is the commonest way to lose the marks.

5 Unquoted entities

This recording predates the 2027 syllabus. It covers the rest of the chapter — unquoted entities, bonus issues, stock splits and scrip dividends; carry three things with you.

Markets: it calls the FTSE “the Financial Times Stock Exchange”; it is a family of share indices. What matters is the pattern in this section — a main market and lighter growth markets — and its company examples are dated.

Stock splits: it calls a split “a free issue of shares”. A split subdivides each share into more shares of smaller nominal value; nothing moves out of reserves and share capital is unchanged (the table in Section 6).

Why bonus issues are made: it says a bonus issue is usually made in place of a dividend. That is a scrip dividend (Section 7); a bonus issue capitalises reserves and makes the shares more marketable (Section 6).

YouTube video

An unquoted entity that does not want to float, or is not yet in a position to, still has ways of raising equity:

  • A rights issue to the existing shareholders — always available, and it needs no market. What it needs is shareholders with money.

  • A private placing — new shares sold directly to a small number of investors, negotiated one to one.

  • Venture capital or private equity — a specialist investor takes a substantial minority or majority stake, usually with board representation, a defined exit horizon and rights that a listed shareholder would never have. Private equity as an acquirer of businesses is a different subject and belongs to the valuation chapters later in this text.

  • A reverse takeover — the unquoted entity acquires a listed one, or is acquired by it in exchange for shares, with the result that its owners control a listed vehicle. It is a route to a listing rather than a source of finance in itself.

The obstacle to a listing is size. Most markets have a tiered structure — a main market with the fullest requirements and the largest entities, and one or more growth markets with lighter entry and continuing requirements, aimed at smaller entities. The names differ from country to country. What matters is the pattern: lighter requirements on the growth market, and in exchange less liquidity, a narrower investor base and a lower profile.

6 Bonus issues and stock splits

Neither of these raises any money. Both increase the number of shares in issue and reduce the price of each, which can make the shares more marketable — a share trading at $60 is a less convenient unit than one trading at $6.

Bonus issue (scrip issue)

Stock split

What happens

Free shares are issued to existing shareholders in proportion to their holdings.

Each existing share is subdivided into a larger number of shares of smaller nominal value.

Nominal value per share

Unchanged

Reduced proportionately

Share capital

Increased, by capitalising reserves — share premium first where it is available, then retained earnings

Unchanged

Total equity

Unchanged

Unchanged

Cash raised

None

None

Bonus issue and stock split

A company has 40 million 50c ordinary shares in issue and a share price of $6.00. Its equity comprises share capital of $20 million, share premium of $12 million and retained earnings of $48 million.

Required

For each of (i) a 1-for-4 bonus issue and (ii) a 2-for-1 stock split, state the number of shares in issue afterwards, the nominal value per share, the theoretical share price and the effect on total equity.

Show answerHide answer

Bonus issue and stock split

The market capitalisation before either event is 40 million × $6.00 = $240 million, and total equity is $20m + $12m + $48m = $80 million. Neither event changes either total, because neither brings in any cash or creates any value.

Before

1-for-4 bonus issue

2-for-1 stock split

Shares in issue

40m

50m

80m

Nominal value per share

50c

50c

25c

Share capital

$20m

$25m

$20m

Share premium

$12m

$7m

$12m

Retained earnings

$48m

$48m

$48m

Total equity

$80m

$80m

$80m

Theoretical share price

$6.00

$4.80

$3.00

Bonus issue: 10 million new shares of 50c nominal are issued, so share capital rises by $5 million. That $5 million is capitalised out of reserves, share premium first, which falls from $12m to $7m. Price afterwards = $240m ÷ 50m = $4.80.

Stock split: each 50c share becomes two 25c shares, so there are 80 million shares of 25c and the share capital is still 80m × 25c = $20 million. Nothing moves between reserves at all. Price afterwards = $240m ÷ 80m = $3.00.

The distinction to hold on to is that a bonus issue moves money out of distributable reserves into share capital, which reduces what could later be paid as a dividend, whereas a stock split changes nothing but the nominal value.

7 Scrip dividends

A scrip dividend offers shareholders new shares instead of a cash dividend, leaving the choice to each shareholder. For the entity it is a way of retaining cash while still making a distribution, and the new shares are, in effect, issued for the cash that would otherwise have gone out.

A scrip dividend is a dividend decision rather than a share-issue decision, and it is dealt with with the rest of dividend policy in chapter 7.

8 Test your knowledge

Two quick checks before you move on: work through the flashcards to fix this chapter’s terms and definitions, then sit the objective questions for exam-style practice. Both mark themselves and explain the answers as you go.

Practice questions

Equity Finance

20 questions

Answer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.

Open chapter practice