After the acquisition, Pandar sold goods to Salva for $15 million on which Pandar made
a gross profit of 20%. Salva had one third of these goods still in its inventory at
30 September 20X9. Pandar also sold goods to Ambra for $6 million, making the same
margin. Ambra had half of these goods still in inventory at 30 September 20X9.
Hello! My question is why we shouldn't add PUP = 240 on Sale with Associate to Cost of sales?
Cost of sales
$000
Pandar 126,000
Salva (100,000 × 6/12) 50,000
Intra?group purchases (15,000)
Additional depreciation: plant (5,000/5 years × 6/12) 500
Unrealised profit in inventories (15,000/3 × 20%) 1,000
–––––––
162,500
Ask the Tutor ACCA FR
Pandar 415 Urgent!!!
3y ago#1Hi,
The answer appears to use the older treatment of a PUP between the group and the associate. There should be an adjustment to CoS for the sale between the group and the associate as it is a downstream transaction from the parent to the associate. You can check the syllabus guide on the ACCA website to confirm this and the class notes, if you wish.
Thanks
Sign into reply to this topic.