Skip to contentSkip to search

Group Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income

CIMA Free Mock Exam

The consolidated statement of financial position answers the question what does the group own and owe. This chapter answers the other one: what did the group earn. The parent's own statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income is added to those of its subsidiaries line by line, everything the group did with itself is stripped out, and the result is presented — for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 — in the structure IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements requires.

The shape of that statement — the categories, the two required subtotals, how operating expenses are analysed, and what an aggregated line item may and may not be called — is taught in the chapter IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements. It is not repeated here. What this chapter adds is everything that is true only of a group: whose results go in and from when, what has to be eliminated, which consolidation adjustment lands in which category, and how the result is attributed between the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interests.

IFRS 18 and this chapter

From 2027 the statement of profit or loss is presented under IFRS 18: income and expenses are classified into operating, investing and financing categories, with two required subtotals — operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes. IFRS 18 is taught in the chapter IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements; we do not repeat it here.

What changes in this chapter is where the group's own figures land. The share of profit of associates and joint ventures moves up into the investing category, above profit before financing and income taxes, instead of sitting immediately before profit before tax; a single “other income” caption can no longer stand, because its contents split between the operating and the investing categories; and the two new subtotals are not attributed — the split between the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interests still happens once, at profit for the year, and once at total comprehensive income.

1 Whose results go in: control

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements decides which entities are consolidated, and it does so through one idea: control. An investor controls an investee when, and only when, it has all three of the following:

  1. power over the investee — existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the activities that significantly affect the investee's returns;

  2. exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and

  3. the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of those returns.

All three must be present, and control is reassessed if the facts change. Holding more than half the voting rights is the usual route to power, but it is neither the only one nor conclusive on its own. A parent/subsidiary relationship can exist on less than half the voting rights — through an agreement with other investors, through rights to appoint or remove the majority of the board or to cast the majority of its votes, or through a shareholding large enough to direct the relevant activities in practice against a widely dispersed register.

Older material defines control as “the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities”. That was IAS 27's test and it was replaced when IFRS 10 was issued. The difference is not cosmetic: IFRS 10 also requires exposure to variable returns and the ability to use power to affect them, so a decision-maker acting as an agent for others can have power over an investee without controlling it.

Control, the acquisition method and goodwill are taught in full in the consolidated statement of financial position chapter. The definition is stated here because it is the test that decides which statements of profit or loss are added together in the first place.

2 Consolidate first, classify second

There is an order to the work, and reversing it produces a whole family of wrong answers.

  1. Consolidate. Add the parent's and the subsidiaries' income and expenses across line by line, pro-rating a subsidiary acquired mid-year; eliminate intra-group trading, intra-group interest and intra-group dividends in full; adjust for unrealised profit, for depreciation on fair value uplifts and for any impairment of goodwill; and equity-account any associate or joint venture.

  2. Then classify. Take the consolidated income and expenses, put each into its IFRS 18 category, and build the two required subtotals from them.

IFRS 18 has five categories, three of them main. Operating, investing and financing are the three that restructure the statement; income taxes and discontinued operations are the other two, and they sit where you already expect them. Classification is applied to the group's figures, not to each company's, and that single fact settles most of the questions this chapter raises.

1 Consolidate100% of P + 100% of each Spro-rated from the acquisition dateeliminate intra-group trading,interest and dividends in full2 Classifythe consolidated income andexpenses, into the operating,investing and financingcategories3 Build the two subtotalsOperating profitProfit before financing andincome taxesneither of them is attributed4 Attribute — onceProfit for the year, andtotal comprehensive income,between the owners of the parentand the non-controlling interests

Working the two steps in that order gives each consolidation adjustment a home:

Consolidation adjustment

Where it lands under IFRS 18

Intra-group interest

Nowhere. It is eliminated in full against the matching intra-group finance income, so it never reaches the financing category at all.

A subsidiary's finance cost on borrowings from outside the group

The financing category. From the acquisition date it is a group finance cost, exactly like the parent's own.

A provision for unrealised profit (PUP)

The operating category. The adjustment increases consolidated cost of sales.

Depreciation on a fair value uplift to a subsidiary's assets

The operating category, like any other depreciation.

Impairment of goodwill

The operating category. It is an impairment of an operating asset, charged to whichever operating expense line the question directs.

The share of profit of associates and joint ventures

The investing category — above profit before financing and income taxes, not below finance costs.

A subsidiary's investment property rental income

The investing category. It is group investing income.

An intra-group dividend received by the parent from a subsidiary

Nowhere. Eliminated in full. What survives is investment income from outside the group, which is investing.

“Other income” cannot survive as a single caption. Pre-2027 group statements often carried one “other income” line above finance costs, holding whatever did not fit elsewhere. Under IFRS 18 its contents split. Sundry operating income stays in the operating category, above operating profit; rental income from investment property, interest on cash and cash equivalents and dividends from investments outside the group are investing income and sit below operating profit. When a question hands you an “other income” figure, ask what is in it before you place it.

The share of associate profit has moved. Every pre-2027 pro-forma put the share of profit of associates and joint ventures immediately before profit before tax, below finance costs. It is investing-category income, so it now sits above profit before financing and income taxes. A student who reproduces the old layout does not merely put one line in the wrong place: the second required subtotal comes out wrong.

Group SPLOCI: this recording predates IFRS 18. The consolidation it teaches — 100% of each line, pro-rating a mid-year subsidiary, intra-group sales, unrealised profit, dividends, one year’s fair value depreciation and the attribution — is unchanged, and it works Example 2 (MYA) to the same figures. The statement it builds runs from operating profit straight to the tax charge; from 2027 profit before financing and income taxes is presented as well, even where, as here, it equals operating profit ($110.5m). The share of profit of associates, which it says comes later, is taught in the Associates chapter and sits between those two subtotals.

YouTube video

3 What goes into each line

The group column is built one caption at a time. Every line takes 100% of the parent and 100% of each subsidiary — control, not ownership, decides what is added in — and then the eliminations and adjustments are applied.

Line

What the group column contains

Revenue

100% of the parent + 100% of each subsidiary, pro-rated from the acquisition date, less intra-group sales in full

Cost of sales

100% + 100% (pro-rated), less the same intra-group sales, plus any provision for unrealised profit, plus depreciation on fair value uplifts

Distribution costs; administrative expenses; other operating income and expenses

100% + 100% (pro-rated). Any impairment of goodwill is added to the operating line the question directs

Operating profit

The total of the operating category — a required subtotal

Share of profit of associates and joint ventures

The group's share of the associate's profit after tax, from the date the investment was acquired. Investing

Investment income

Dividends and interest from outside the group only; intra-group dividends are eliminated in full. Investing

Profit before financing and income taxes

Operating profit plus the investing category — the second required subtotal

Finance costs

100% + 100% (pro-rated), less intra-group interest in full. Financing

Profit before tax

Presented by convention; it is not one of the required subtotals

Income tax expense

100% + 100% (pro-rated)

Profit for the year

Then attributed between the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interests

Other comprehensive income

100% + 100% (pro-rated). Not categorised — the three main categories apply to profit or loss only

Total comprehensive income for the year

Then attributed as well

Where a group has nothing in the investing category, operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes are the same number; where it has nothing in the financing category, profit before financing and income taxes and profit before tax are the same number. Both required subtotals are still presented — a subtotal is not dropped because it happens to equal its neighbour. Where profit before tax adds nothing to the second subtotal, the worked answers in this chapter present the required subtotal and do not repeat the same figure under a third caption.

4 The consolidation adjustments

4.1 Mid-year acquisition

If a subsidiary is acquired part-way through the year its results can be consolidated only from the acquisition date, because that is when the parent gained control. Pro-rate the subsidiary's results line by line — revenue, cost of sales, every expense, the tax charge and each item of other comprehensive income — not just the profit figure. The parent's own results always go in in full: the parent existed for the whole year.

Pro-rating assumes income and expenses accrue evenly, and a question will usually say so. Where it says otherwise — a seasonal trade, or a gain arising on a known date — apportion on the facts given instead.

4.2 Intra-group trading

The group is treated as a single entity, so sales between group companies are sales the group made to itself. Eliminate the whole invoiced amount, whichever way the goods went, from both revenue and cost of sales:

Dr

Revenue (consolidated statement of profit or loss)

X

Cr

Cost of sales (consolidated statement of profit or loss)

X

Group profit does not change — the same amount comes out of both lines — but revenue and cost of sales are both overstated until the adjustment is made, and each is a marked figure in its own right. Where the subsidiary was acquired mid-year, eliminate only the intra-group sales made after the acquisition; sales made before it were between unrelated parties.

4.3 Provision for unrealised profit (PUP)

When one group company sells goods to another at a profit and the buyer still holds them at the year end, that profit has not been earned by the group — it is profit the group made from itself, sitting inside the carrying amount of inventory. Strip it out. The adjustment is an increase in cost of sales, made in the seller's column.

The arithmetic turns on whether the question gives a mark-up or a margin. For a mark-up of m% on cost:

PUP = Invoiced value × [m ÷ (100 + m)] × Proportion still held

and for a margin of m% on the selling price:

PUP = Invoiced value × (m ÷ 100) × Proportion still held

Which column the adjustment goes in matters only when the seller is a subsidiary with a non-controlling interest. It then reduces the subsidiary's profit, and so reduces the non-controlling interests' share of it. If the parent was the seller, the whole of the adjustment falls on the owners of the parent. Either way it lands in cost of sales, so it is an operating item.

4.4 Dividends

Only income from outside the group is income of the group. A dividend the parent receives from a subsidiary is the group paying itself, so it is eliminated in full from investment income. Deduct the parent's share of the subsidiary's dividend: the non-controlling interests' share of that dividend does leave the group, but it is a distribution to owners and belongs in the consolidated statement of changes in equity, not here.

What survives — dividends and interest received from investments outside the group — is investing income, presented between operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes. A dividend received from an associate is not income at all: it reduces the carrying amount of the investment, so it never appears in investment income either.

4.5 Fair value adjustments

On acquisition the subsidiary's identifiable assets and liabilities are brought into the group accounts at fair value. Where the fair value of a depreciable asset exceeded its carrying amount in the subsidiary's own books, the group must charge depreciation on the uplift as well. Any change arising from the fair value exercise — extra depreciation, or a movement on a contingent liability recognised at acquisition — is accounted for in the subsidiary's column, because it is an adjustment to the subsidiary's assets and liabilities; it then flows into the non-controlling interests' share automatically.

One year only. In the consolidated statement of financial position the fair value depreciation is cumulative — every year since acquisition. In the statement of profit or loss it is the current year's charge alone, pro-rated if the subsidiary was acquired mid-year. A subsidiary bought three years ago carries three years of extra accumulated depreciation on the statement of financial position and one year of extra depreciation charge here.

4.6 Impairment of goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment every year. The charge is an operating expense — it goes to administrative expenses, to operating expenses or to a line of its own, as the question directs — and where it falls between the parent and the non-controlling interests depends on how the non-controlling interest was measured at acquisition:

  • Non-controlling interest at fair value (full goodwill). The goodwill recognised includes the non-controlling interests' share, so the impairment is shared in the same proportion. Put it in the subsidiary's column: the non-controlling interests' share then falls out automatically when that column is totalled for the attribution.

  • Non-controlling interest at the proportionate share of net assets. Only the parent's share of goodwill was ever recognised, so the whole impairment falls on the owners of the parent. Put it in the parent's column.

That one decision — which column the impairment goes in — changes the non-controlling interests' figure and nothing else, and both answers look plausible on the page. Read the question's non-controlling interest policy before you place it.

5 Attribution: profit for the year and total comprehensive income

The consolidated statement includes 100% of every subsidiary's income and expenses, because the group controls them. Part of the resulting profit belongs to the other shareholders in those subsidiaries. The statement therefore ends by attributing two figures — and only two:

$000

Profit for the year attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

X

Non-controlling interests (NCI% × S's adjusted profit for the year)

X

X

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

X

Non-controlling interests (NCI% × S's adjusted total comprehensive income)

X

X

The new subtotals are not attributed

There is no “operating profit attributable to non-controlling interests” line, and no non-controlling interest column against the subtotals. Attribution happens once, at profit for the year, and once at total comprehensive income — exactly as it did before 2027. The only place in IFRS 18 where a subtotal-level effect on non-controlling interests is disclosed at all is the note on management-defined performance measures, which must give the tax effect and the effect on non-controlling interests of each reconciling item. That is a note, not a line on the face of the statement.

5.1 Working out the non-controlling interests' share

The figure is a percentage of the subsidiary's own profit, as adjusted in the consolidation. In a columnar answer it is simply the total of the subsidiary's column; written out as a working it is:

$000

S's profit for the year × months since acquisition ÷ 12

X

less S's own provision for unrealised profit, where S was the seller

(X)

less depreciation for the period on the fair value uplift to S's assets

(X)

less the impairment of goodwill, where the non-controlling interest is measured at fair value

(X)

S's adjusted profit for the year

X

× NCI% = the non-controlling interests' share

X

The same column, plus the subsidiary's own other comprehensive income for the period, gives the non-controlling interests' share of total comprehensive income. The amounts attributable to the owners of the parent are then balancing figures — the group total less the non-controlling interests' share.

6 Other comprehensive income in a group

Other comprehensive income is consolidated exactly as profit or loss is: 100% of the parent plus 100% of each subsidiary, pro-rated from the acquisition date, with any intra-group items eliminated. Two things about it are worth stating plainly, because students go looking for them and they are not there.

  • Other comprehensive income is not categorised. The operating, investing and financing categories apply to profit or loss only. There is no operating/investing/financing analysis of other comprehensive income. IFRS 18 did not change the split between profit or loss and other comprehensive income either, or the recycling of the items that recycle.

  • It is attributed, though. Total comprehensive income is split between the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interests in its own right, using the subsidiary's total comprehensive income rather than its profit. That is the one step this statement has that the group statement of profit or loss alone does not.

IFRS 18 retains the choice between presenting one statement and presenting two — a separate statement of profit or loss followed by a statement beginning with profit for the year and presenting the components of other comprehensive income. This chapter's examples use the single statement, which is what CIMA's own pro-forma shows.

7 Discontinued operations and assets held for sale

A group that is selling or closing part of itself has one more presentation step. IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations belongs here because the component being disposed of is usually a subsidiary, and because the discontinued-operation classification changes where the component's results appear in this statement.

A discontinued operation is a component of the entity — operations and cash flows clearly distinguishable from the rest, operationally and for reporting purposes — that has been disposed of during the period or is classified as held for sale at the reporting date, and that also:

  • represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations — one factory, or one product dropped from a range, is not enough;

  • is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of one; or

  • is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.

The consequence is a single line. Everything the operation earned and spent — revenue, cost of sales, operating expenses, finance costs and its own tax — comes out of the continuing captions and is presented as one post-tax figure at the foot of the statement, below the income tax expense, with the analysis behind it given in a note. That figure also carries any post-tax gain or loss on remeasuring the operation to fair value less costs to sell, and on the disposal itself. The prior year is re-presented on the same basis. A disposal that does not meet the definition produces no single line: those results stay in continuing operations.

Foot of the consolidated statement of profit or loss

$000

Profit before tax (continuing operations)

1,200

Income tax expense

(300)

Profit for the year from continuing operations

900

Profit for the year from discontinued operations

140

Profit for the year

1,040

Attributable to the owners of the parent

980

Attributable to the non-controlling interests

60

Discontinued operations is a category in its own right — one of the five — and it lies outside the three main categories and outside both required subtotals. Operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes are struck on continuing operations; the discontinued figure is added after the income tax expense to reach profit for the year, which is then attributed once between the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interests. IFRS 5 asks in addition for the owners' share to be analysed between continuing and discontinued operations — a disclosure, not a line on the face. The categories themselves are taught in the chapter IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements.

Held for sale — revision

An asset, or a disposal group, is held for sale when its carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale rather than through continuing use: it must be available for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale must be highly probable. From that point it is measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, and depreciation ceases — it is being recovered by sale, not by use. F1 material, revised here because a subsidiary held for sale is what brings this presentation into a group statement.

This recording predates IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, which replaces IAS 1 for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. Where the recording’s statement of profit or loss differs from this chapter’s, the chapter governs. Both recordings below use the pre-2027 captions.

Group SPLOCI example: the recording is right, and avoids two common errors: investment income is $2m on the 80% the question gives, not the $3m on a 70% that appears nowhere in the question, and the non-controlling interests are $4.76m on a base of 25, not $1.76m on a base of 10. There is one spoken slip — “47 million” for 4.76.

Group SPLOCI – Example 2: the recording is right, and avoids a common error: the non-controlling interests are 364 and 404, not 404 and 444, because under the fair value method the impairment is borne 80:20, and the recording says so. One figure is mis-keyed aloud as “three three four six”; it is 3,386. The recording calls 4,720 “profit before tax” and names no subtotal above it — not wrong for 2026, incomplete for 2027 — and “consolidated statement of comprehensive income” is not a name this chapter uses.

YouTube video
YouTube video

8 Worked examples

Basic consolidation

Statements of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5:

Vader

Maul

$000

$000

Revenue

1,645

1,280

Cost of sales

(1,205)

(990)

Gross profit

440

290

Distribution costs

(100)

(70)

Administrative expenses

(90)

(50)

Operating profit

250

170

Investment income

10

–

Profit before financing and income taxes

260

170

Finance costs

(55)

(30)

Profit before tax

205

140

Income tax expense

(35)

(28)

Profit for the year

170

112

Additional information:

  • On 1 July 20X5, Vader acquired 80% of the equity shares of Maul. It is group policy to measure the non-controlling interest at acquisition at fair value.

  • Maul declared a dividend during the year, after the acquisition, of $10,000.

  • Assume that profits accrue evenly during the year.

Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the Vader group for the year ended 31 December 20X5, and attribute the profit for the year.

Show answerHide answer

Basic consolidation

Maul was acquired half way through the year, so six months of its results are consolidated. Every line is pro-rated, not just the profit.

Consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5

$000

Revenue (1,645 + 6/12 × 1,280)

2,285

Cost of sales (1,205 + 6/12 × 990)

(1,700)

Gross profit

585

Distribution costs (100 + 6/12 × 70)

(135)

Administrative expenses (90 + 6/12 × 50)

(115)

Operating profit

335

Investment income (10 – 80% × 10)

2

Profit before financing and income taxes

337

Finance costs (55 + 6/12 × 30)

(70)

Profit before tax

267

Income tax expense (35 + 6/12 × 28)

(49)

Profit for the year

218

Profit for the year attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

206.8

Non-controlling interests (20% × 6/12 × 112)

11.2

218.0

Two points of technique. Maul's dividend of $10,000 was paid inside the group, so Vader's 80% of it — 8 in the $000 column — is removed from Vader's investment income of 10. The 2 that survives came from outside the group and is investing-category income, which is why it now sits above profit before financing and income taxes rather than next to finance costs. And Vader's own finance cost of 55 is a group finance cost for the whole year, while Maul's 30 is pro-rated like everything else.

Check. Vader's own profit for the year of 170, less the 8 of intra-group dividend it received, is 162; add 80% of Maul's post-acquisition profit of 56 (44.8) and the owners of the parent are entitled to 206.8. The non-controlling interests take 20% of the same 56, or 11.2, and the two add back to the group profit for the year of 218.

MYA

Statements of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5:

Edinburgh

Glasgow

Aberdeen

$m

$m

$m

Revenue

200

240

120

Cost of sales

(120)

(160)

(50)

Gross profit

80

80

70

Operating expenses

(30)

(30)

(32)

Operating profit

50

50

38

Profit before financing and income taxes

50

50

38

Income tax expense

(10)

(10)

(8)

Profit for the year

40

40

30

Additional information:

  • Edinburgh acquired 80% of the equity share capital of Glasgow on 1 July 20X5, and 75% of the equity share capital of Aberdeen several years ago.

  • Edinburgh sold goods to Aberdeen invoiced at $10m, including a mark-up of 25%, and all of the goods remain in Aberdeen's inventory at the year end.

  • Glasgow sold goods to Edinburgh invoiced at $5m, including a mark-up of 25%. All of these sales occurred after the acquisition and half of the goods remain in inventory at the year end.

Produce the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the Edinburgh group for the year ended 31 December 20X5.

Show answerHide answer

MYA

Glasgow is consolidated for six months; Aberdeen, acquired years ago, in full. Both provisions for unrealised profit go in the seller's column: Edinburgh sold to Aberdeen, Glasgow sold to Edinburgh.

Consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5

Edinburgh

Glasgow 6/12

Aberdeen

Adjustments

Group $m

Revenue

200

120

120

(15)

425

Cost of sales

(120)

(80)

(50)

15

PUP (25/125 × 10)

(2)

PUP (25/125 × 5 × ½)

(0.5)

(237.5)

Gross profit

187.5

Operating expenses

(30)

(15)

(32)

(77)

Operating profit

110.5

Profit before financing and income taxes

110.5

Income tax expense

(10)

(5)

(8)

(23)

Profit for the year

19.5

30

87.5

Non-controlling interest %

20%

25%

Profit for the year attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

76.1

Non-controlling interests

3.9

7.5

11.4

87.5

Workings. Revenue and cost of sales each lose the full $10m Edinburgh sold to Aberdeen and the full $5m Glasgow sold to Edinburgh — $15m in all. Edinburgh's unrealised profit is 25/125 × $10m = $2m, none of it realised because Aberdeen still holds every item. Glasgow's is 25/125 × $5m = $1m, of which half is still held, so $0.5m. Group cost of sales is therefore 120 + 80 + 50 – 15 + 2 + 0.5 = $237.5m.

The attribution. Glasgow's column totals $19.5m — six months of its $40m profit, less its own $0.5m unrealised profit — and 20% of that is $3.9m. Aberdeen's $30m is unadjusted, because Aberdeen was the buyer in the sale from Edinburgh, so its own profit is untouched; 25% of it is $7.5m. The owners of the parent take the balance, $87.5m – $11.4m = $76.1m.

The subtotal that is easy to miss. This group has nothing in the investing category and nothing in the financing category, so profit before financing and income taxes is the same $110.5m as operating profit. It is still presented. An answer that runs from operating profit straight to the tax charge has omitted a required subtotal, and that is a presentation error even though every figure in it is right.

Unrealised profits

Statements of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5:

Gary

Nick

$000

$000

Revenue

120,000

90,000

Cost of sales

(70,000)

(40,000)

Gross profit

50,000

50,000

Operating expenses

(20,000)

(35,000)

Operating profit

30,000

15,000

Profit before financing and income taxes

30,000

15,000

Finance costs

(2,000)

(500)

Profit before tax

28,000

14,500

Income tax expense

(6,000)

(3,000)

Profit for the year

22,000

11,500

Additional information:

  • Gary acquired 80% of Nick on 1 January 20X5. It is group policy to measure the non-controlling interest at acquisition at fair value (the full goodwill method).

  • Goodwill on acquisition has been impaired by $1 million during the year and is to be charged to operating expenses.

  • During the year Nick sold $10 million of goods to Gary at a mark-up of 25% on cost. One quarter of those goods are in inventory at the year end.

Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the Gary group for the year ended 31 December 20X5.

Show answerHide answer

Unrealised profits

Nick was acquired on the first day of the year, so nothing is pro-rated. Nick was the seller, so its column carries the unrealised profit; the non-controlling interest is at fair value, so its column carries the goodwill impairment too.

Consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5

Gary

Nick

Adjustments

Group $000

Revenue

120,000

90,000

(10,000)

200,000

Cost of sales

(70,000)

(40,000)

10,000

PUP (25/125 × 10,000 × ¼)

(500)

(100,500)

Gross profit

99,500

Operating expenses

(20,000)

(35,000)

Impairment of goodwill

(1,000)

(56,000)

Operating profit

43,500

Profit before financing and income taxes

43,500

Finance costs

(2,000)

(500)

(2,500)

Profit before tax

41,000

Income tax expense

(6,000)

(3,000)

(9,000)

Profit for the year

10,000

32,000

Profit for the year attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

30,000

Non-controlling interests (20% × 10,000)

2,000

32,000

Workings. All figures are in $000, so the $10 million intra-group sale is 10,000 and the $1 million impairment is 1,000. The sale comes out of revenue and cost of sales alike. The unrealised profit is 25/125 × 10,000 = 2,000, of which one quarter is still held: 500, added to cost of sales in Nick's column. The 1,000 goodwill impairment goes to operating expenses, also in Nick's column, because the non-controlling interest is measured at fair value and the impairment is therefore shared.

The attribution. Nick's column totals 10,000 — its own profit for the year of 11,500 less the 500 unrealised profit and the 1,000 impairment — and the non-controlling interests take 20% of it, 2,000. Had the non-controlling interest been measured at the proportionate share of net assets instead, the impairment would have sat in Gary's column, Nick's column would have totalled 11,000 and the non-controlling interests would have taken 2,200.

Presentation. Neither company has anything in the investing category, so profit before financing and income taxes equals operating profit at 43,500. The finance costs of both companies are group finance costs — there is no intra-group interest here to eliminate — and they sit below that subtotal.

Pip

Statements of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5:

Pip

Posy

$m

$m

Revenue

250

280

Cost of sales

(100)

(160)

Gross profit

150

120

Distribution costs

(30)

(20)

Administrative expenses

(40)

(30)

Operating profit

80

70

Investment income

10

–

Profit before financing and income taxes

90

70

Income tax expense

(30)

(20)

Profit for the year

60

50

Additional information:

  • Pip acquired 80% of Posy on 1 July 20X5, when Posy's property, plant and equipment had a fair value $2m more than its carrying amount. The property, plant and equipment had a remaining useful life of 5 years at the acquisition date. Depreciation is charged to cost of sales.

  • Following the acquisition Posy sold $10m of goods to Pip at a mark-up of 25% on cost; half of these goods are in inventory at the year end.

  • Posy paid a dividend of $10m after the acquisition.

State, for the Pip group statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X5:

  1. the group revenue figure: $_________

  2. the group cost of sales figure: $_________

  3. the group investment income figure: $_________

  4. the non-controlling interests' share of profit for the year: $_________

Show answerHide answer

Pip

Posy is consolidated for six months. Two adjustments run through cost of sales — the unrealised profit and the depreciation on the fair value uplift — and both of them belong in Posy's column, because Posy was the seller and the uplift is to Posy's assets.

Workings

$m

Unrealised profit: $10m × 25/125 = $2m, half still held

1.0

Fair value depreciation: $2m ÷ 5 years × 6/12

0.2

$m

(i) Group revenue 250 + (280 × 6/12) – 10

380.0

(ii) Group cost of sales 100 + (160 × 6/12) – 10 + 1 + 0.2

171.2

(iii) Group investment income 10 – (80% × 10)

2.0

(iv) Non-controlling interests 20% × [(50 × 6/12) – 1 – 0.2]

4.76

On (iii). Posy's $10m dividend was paid after the acquisition, so 80% of it — $8m — went to Pip and is inside Pip's investment income of $10m. It is the group paying itself, so it is eliminated in full and $2m survives. Under IFRS 18 that $2m is investing-category income: it sits between operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes, not immediately before profit before tax.

On (iv). Start from Posy's own profit for the year of $50m, take six months of it ($25m), then deduct the two adjustments that reduce Posy's own result — the $1m unrealised profit and the $0.2m fair value depreciation — to give $23.8m. The non-controlling interests take 20%, or $4.76m. The dividend does not enter this calculation at all: a dividend is a distribution of profit, not an expense, so it has already been left in the $50m.

The trap. The base figure is Posy's profit, pro-rated — not the $10m dividend, and not Posy's full-year profit. Getting $25m rather than $50m or $10m onto the front of that line is the whole of the mark.

TJ

Statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 20X5:

TJ

WM

$000

$000

Revenue

16,500

13,800

Cost of sales

(12,800)

(9,750)

Gross profit

3,700

4,050

Distribution costs

(500)

(600)

Administrative expenses

(850)

(780)

Operating profit

2,350

2,670

Profit before financing and income taxes

2,350

2,670

Income tax expense

(600)

(650)

Profit for the year

1,750

2,020

Other comprehensive income:

Gains on property revaluation (net of tax)

120

200

Total comprehensive income for the year

1,870

2,220

Additional information:

  • TJ purchased 80% of the shares in WM on 1 January 20X5. It is group policy to measure the non-controlling interest using the fair value method.

  • TJ sold $2 million of goods to WM at a mark-up of 25%, and a quarter of these remained in WM's inventory at the year end.

  • During the year the goodwill on acquisition was impaired by $0.2 million. Impairments are charged to administrative expenses.

Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the TJ group for the year ended 31 December 20X5.

Show answerHide answer

TJ

WM was acquired on the first day of the year, so nothing is pro-rated. TJ was the seller, so the unrealised profit goes in TJ's column; the non-controlling interest is measured at fair value, so the goodwill impairment goes in WM's.

Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 20X5

TJ

WM

Adjustments

Group $000

Revenue

16,500

13,800

(2,000)

28,300

Cost of sales

(12,800)

(9,750)

2,000

PUP (2,000 × 25/125 × ¼)

(100)

(20,650)

Gross profit

7,650

Distribution costs

(500)

(600)

(1,100)

Administrative expenses

(850)

(780)

Impairment of goodwill

(200)

(1,830)

Operating profit

4,720

Profit before financing and income taxes

4,720

Income tax expense

(600)

(650)

(1,250)

Profit for the year

1,820

3,470

Other comprehensive income:

Gains on property revaluation (net of tax)

120

200

320

Total comprehensive income for the year

2,020

3,790

Profit for the year attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

3,106

Non-controlling interests (20% × 1,820)

364

3,470

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

Owners of the parent (β)

3,386

Non-controlling interests (20% × 2,020)

404

3,790

Workings. The unrealised profit is 2,000 × 25/125 × ¼ = 100. Group cost of sales is 12,800 + 9,750 + 100 – 2,000 = 20,650. Administrative expenses are 850 + 780 + 200 = 1,830.

Where the impairment goes, and why it matters. The non-controlling interest is measured at fair value, so the goodwill recognised on acquisition is full goodwill — the parent's share and the non-controlling interests' share together. An impairment of it is therefore borne by both, in the same 80:20 proportion. Putting the 200 in WM's column does that automatically: WM's column then totals 1,820 for profit and 2,020 for total comprehensive income, and 20% of each is the non-controlling interests' share. Had the policy been the proportionate share of net assets, the impairment would have gone in TJ's column and the non-controlling interests would have taken 20% × 2,020 = 404 and 20% × 2,220 = 444 instead.

Check. TJ's own profit for the year of 1,750, less its 100 of unrealised profit, is 1,650; 80% of WM's adjusted 1,820 is 1,456; together 3,106, which is the owners' share as a balancing figure. The same test on total comprehensive income: 1,870 – 100 = 1,770, plus 80% × 2,020 = 1,616, giving 3,386.

Presentation. This group has nothing in the investing category and nothing in the financing category, so operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes are both 4,720 and profit before tax would add a third identical line; both required subtotals are still presented. Other comprehensive income carries no category analysis at all — the three main categories apply to profit or loss only — but it is attributed, which is the extra step this statement has.

Consolidate first, classify second. Add 100% of the parent to 100% of each subsidiary line by line, pro-rating a subsidiary from its acquisition date; eliminate intra-group sales from revenue and cost of sales alike, intra-group interest from finance costs, and the parent's share of an intra-group dividend from investment income; add the provision for unrealised profit and the fair value depreciation to cost of sales in the seller's and the subsidiary's columns respectively; and charge any goodwill impairment to an operating expense line — in the subsidiary's column where the non-controlling interest is at fair value, in the parent's where it is at the proportionate share of net assets. Then classify the consolidated figures: a subsidiary's finance cost is financing, a PUP and fair value depreciation are operating, and the share of profit of associates and joint ventures, investment income from outside the group and investment property rental income are all investing, above the second subtotal. Build operating profit and profit before financing and income taxes — both are presented even when they are the same number — and then attribute, once at profit for the year and once at total comprehensive income. Neither of the two new subtotals is attributed, and other comprehensive income is not categorised.

9 Test your knowledge

Practice questions

Group Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income

22 questions

Answer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.

Open chapter practice