• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Time value of money

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Time value of money

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 21, 2021 at 4:34 am #628956
    Sourav9271
    Participant
    • Topics: 164
    • Replies: 117
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir,
    The question asked to quote minimum contract price.
    I got till 125,696
    But I didn’t quite understand why further discounting .

    Wasn’t DCF already incorporated whilst reaching at 125,696.

    July 21, 2021 at 10:48 am #628987
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Please do not post links like this, it is illegal for us because of copyright laws.

    For the minimum contract price, the NPV must be zero. Therefore the PV of the receipt in 2 years time must be 125,696. That to be the PV of the contract price, the amount itself must be 125,696 divided by the two year discount factor as explained in the answer.

    July 21, 2021 at 11:57 am #628998
    Sourav9271
    Participant
    • Topics: 164
    • Replies: 117
    • ☆☆☆

    Sorry sir I won’t attach any links ..

    However why does the amount itself be discounted..

    Wasn’t 125696 reached as a result of discounting.?

    July 21, 2021 at 3:35 pm #629038
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes it was reached as a result of discounting – it is the PV of other flows.

    For the NPV to be zero, the PV of the receipt must also be equal to 125,696 (not the receipt itself, but the PV of the receipt).

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hadeelalhumaidi on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part c) – ACCA (FA) lectures
  • hadeelalhumaidi on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part c) – ACCA (FA) lectures
  • BARROS on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • muzi569 on Inventory Control (part 3) – Economic Batch Quantity – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Other cash flow issues – ACCA SBR lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in