Dear Nike
I understand that adjusting events are those events that provide evidence of the conditions that exist at the balance sheet date while non adjusting events are indicative of the conditions that exists after the balance sheet date.
But I am confused about what are the conditions referred to.
For example, in a question, as at the year ended 31/12/2011, the balance due to a trade creditor was $30,000. However, due to some financial difficulties of the company, the company negotiated with the creditor who agreed to reduce the payable amount to HK$$20,000 subsequently on 15/3/2012.
The question is: at the year end 31/12/2011, should the trade payable balance be reduced to $20,000 as an adjusting event, or simply leave the balance at $30,000 , with the reduction of the payable balance disclosed as an non-adjusting event?
Would you mind giving me some guidance on this? Thanks.
I understand that adjusting events are those events that provide evidence of the conditions that exist at the balance sheet date while non adjusting events are indicative of the conditions that exists after the balance sheet date.
But I am confused about what are the conditions referred to.
For example, in a question, as at the year ended 31/12/2011, the balance due to a trade creditor was $30,000. However, due to some financial difficulties of the company, the company negotiated with the creditor who agreed to reduce the payable amount to HK$$20,000 subsequently on 15/3/2012.
The question is: at the year end 31/12/2011, should the trade payable balance be reduced to $20,000 as an adjusting event, or simply leave the balance at $30,000 , with the reduction of the payable balance disclosed as an non-adjusting event?
Would you mind giving me some guidance on this? Thanks.
