• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Nentee Co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Nentee Co

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 4, 2021 at 6:29 am #613205
    naini008
    Participant
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Please explain me the following issue:

    I calculated d1 and d2 value and its understood
    but we know if d1 and d2 are +ve then we add 0.5 to standard normal distribution table values and if D1 & d2 turns out to be -ve then we subtract 0.5 from their respective values.
    As per answers
    D1 was 0.359
    D2 was -0.235

    when I look up for values d1 0.359 in normal distribution table it gives value of 0.1517 and after adding 0.5 in this value we get 0.6517 N(d1)
    but in the kit answer it shows N(d1) 0.6402

    Similarly -0.235 should give us value of 0.0987 and as it is d2 was -ve we subtract 0.5 form its respective figure and arrive at N(d2) of 0.4013 and again when I compare it with answer in the kit there is a different value i-e 0.4071

    the difference is not huge but due to the difference my answer does not matches.
    I would really appreciate if any one can explain this.

    March 4, 2021 at 8:44 am #613248
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54657
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    To things:

    Firstly, looking up 0.359 does not give a value of 0.1517. (0.1517 is what you get if you look up for 0.39!!)

    Secondly, given that the tables only go to 2 decimal places, the examiners answer apportions between that value for 0.35 and 0.36. However there is no real need to do this in the exam and it is fine if. you just round to two places and so use the result for 0.36.

    The same applies to 0.235. You have looked up for 0,25 for some reason and that is wrong!!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • NirajNathani99 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AKN1989 on Linear Programming – Maximum contribution – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Motsotase910 on Contingent Assets and Liabilities – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on ACCA F2 Key to success
  • Barlow1989 on CIMA BA2 – The Management Accountant’s Profit Statement – Marginal Costing

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in