Skip to content

Ask the Tutor ACCA FR

MINI EXERCISE 10 GOODWILL Question 2.

IIbrahim10y ago
MINI EXERCISE 10 GOODWILL Question 2. Hi mike,the question says; Suzanna’s retained earnings at 28 February, 2010 were $69 million and at 28 February, 2011 were $82.5 millionret. but in the answer it was, Ret ears b/fwd 69,000,000 and Ret ears 4 months 4,500,000. my understanding is that ret. earning for 4 month should be 4/12*82.5=27.5 therefore 69m+27.5=96.5 will be figures for pre acq. ret. earg. not 69+4.5=73.5 thanks
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor10y ago#1
How much of that $69 million was made pre-acquisition? Answer that for me before we go further
IIbrahim10y ago#2
in the question; On 1 July, 2010, Pyotr acquired 18 million shares in Suzanna and also Suzanna’s retained earnings at 28 February, 2010 were $69 million. thus the whole 69m is pre- acq retained earn.
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor10y ago#3
So why are you trying to tell me that only 4/12 of that $69 million is pre-acquisition?
IIbrahim10y ago#4
my point is that there is another 82.5m ret.earning at 28 February, 2011 apart from retained earnings of 69m at 28 February, 2010. since the acquisition date was On 1 July, 2010, then 69m at 28 feb, 2010 plus 4/12*82.5=27.5 which is 4 month time apportionment of 82.5m of 28 February, 2011.
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor10y ago#5
Whoa, whoa. Stop right there! Is the retained earnings figure not a cumulative figure? Surely what we have here is an amount of $69 million made up to 28 February, 2010 with a further amount of $13.5 million retained earnings made in the year ended 28 February, 2011 You'd better get happy with this and accept that it's correct because it appears frequently in F7 consolidation exercises!
IIbrahim10y ago#6
Is the retained earnings figure not a cumulative figure? this is the golden question that solved my difficulty to understand the logic. thanks thump up. am good to go now
MikeLittleMikeLittleTutor10y ago#7
Well, that's a relief!
Sign in to reply to this topic.