• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 32 Financial Statements: Presentation

Forums › ACCA Forums › General ACCA Forums › IAS 32 Financial Statements: Presentation

  • This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by f6ali.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 17, 2021 at 7:36 am #644440
    hirotakanifuji
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hi! Good day, we just had a debate regarding this question. Almost all of us had different answers. May I know how you would answer this and why? Thank you so much!

    Charlemagne Inc. has in issue P500,000 6% preference shares, which are redeemable at the option of the holder. The preference shares have been in issue for over 10 years and none of them has ever been redeemed. The entity has treated the P30,000 annual payment as a deduction from equity. Is this treatment correct, according to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation?

    a. yes, because shares are equity and the annual payment is a dividend
    b. no, because the annual payment must be separated into dividend and interest components
    c. no, because the preference shares should be classified as a financial liability and the annual payment is interest
    d. yes, because although the preference shares appear to be a liability the substance of the arrangement is that they are equity; in practice they are unlikely ever to be redeemed

    December 17, 2021 at 8:24 am #644441
    mrjonbain
    Moderator
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 2470
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I am a bit confused by the argument that because they are unlikely to be redeemed, even if true, that they should not be treated as effectively irredeemable debt.

    December 18, 2021 at 9:44 am #644500
    f6ali
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 342
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi.

    Looking at the substance of the transaction, these shares are a financial liability. It is the shareholder’s right to redeem them whenever they want, not the company’s.
    So if they do exercise their right, company will have no escape. It will be legally “obligated to transfer cash” to whoever has redeemed them, which makes it a financial liability.
    The fact that no one has redeemed them yet has no impact on the substance of transaction.

    I hope this helps.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Dinomain on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • hoangacca on Cost Classification and Behaviour part 2 – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Elikplim on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Elikplim on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • shravanm on ACCA AAA Employability and Technology Skills

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in