- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
.
- Posts
Hello Sir,
I have just did my first attempt of paper P3 and i felt that it was a moderate paper.
My query is that in Q1 a company’s portfolio was given with three subsidaries and asked to analyze it.
I have analysed and advised that what to do with what subsidary but i didn’t use any model.
So will it be acceptable because it wasn’t specified that we have to use a model for answering that and i have give a detailed reasoning for the choices i have made.
Please do reply me cause i am very much nervous.
Thank you.
Using a model might have given your advice more weight and would probably attract more marks. However, good advice and marks can be given without using a specific model.
Okay thanks for that, it relieved the stress i was facing for the past two days.
I have heard that people saying models are compulsory to apply.
But thinking as a business analyst i don’t find that appropriate.
Will examiner consider my approach and if he would have mentioned to use relevant model and still i haven’t used any then it would be a problem or not?
If the examiner asked you to use a model and you didn’t then of course there will be a problem.
If you have seen the December 2016 P3 exam, would you be able to confirm the NPV amount? Thanks
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.