- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
.
- Posts
ANSWER ONLY 1.5 QUESTIONS.
Remembering that this examiner wanted many people to pass, as he wanted to secure examiner position therefore he dosent want many failure.
Hence they are forcing themselves to allow candidates to pass eventhough many questions are unattempt.
CONTRACTDICTION ON THE EXAMINER REPORT
Extraction from Examiner report: “In previous diets, there have been comments about the
importance of answering all parts of all questions.”
He is sprouting nonsense. I had heard candidates mentioning that they had omitted whole question on Consol or Section Bs and yet they still pass with 51.
I am not advocating writing less in the examination but making the answer more relevant. There is a
need to include analysis of the points being raised and to reflect upon them analytically or critically.
He is talking rubbish. I did not provide answers that synchronise to the requirements on Section B. and Yet still award Pass.
CONCLUSION
This is a sure guarantee pass silli and shameless exam without a NEED TO study hard or whats ever. A shit exam that could easily pass than F1, F2, F3. Just write rubbish or submit blank booklet and they would award you PASS.Did they fail you in another subjects in which you thought you worked really hard? Whatever be the case, this is a professional course, we need to act like professionals too. If we don’t respect education and studies, life too wouldn’t respect us back. God bless.
Dude i dont know if you are aware of this but the pass mark of 50% is based on an average. Lets say u got 60 marks , peace got 70 marks and i got 50. They are going to make an avg with this which here is 60 marks. So the 60 marks becomes the pass mark and i am getting a fail even though i scored 50 marks, Then they allocate a % based on this. So im assuming the year you did p2 many students got weak points in that exam session!!
Candidates taking the forthcoming exams take note
Do not get distraught by failing one or two exams and feel dishearten. ACCA exams are tough and some exams really require Genius to Pass. Eg P3, P4, P5 and above. Nonetheless, there is an exam that you do not really need to put in effort just only need to answer 1.5 questions and you would sure PASS.
This exam is P2 Corporate Reporting which I felt with an insult and humiliation which rightfully I should FAIL this exam. I had performed extremely horrible. Part A of consol I did not answer 3 adjustments. Ethical questions was answered out of point. Section B even horrid,my answer did not synchronise to the requirements. I was expected to fail this exam badly say 30 marks, in contrast I was awarded a PASS with some Unbelievable results. Amazingly, I even heard people pass this exam with CONSOL or Section B unattempted.
Conclusion’
This exam which I conclude is the shameless and silly exam whereby a sure guarantee pass due to examiner wanted to maintain his position and compel to pass people even answers are extremely sub-standard. Candidates taking this SILLY and shameless exam PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT CONSOL or Section B. JUST ANSWER 1.5 questionsKindly don’t misguide students.
Do one thing, copy paste these posts to ACCA along with your registration number and ask them for some help?
- The topic ‘Candidates taking Silli exam (P2) on 10/12/13 please take note on these points’ is closed to new replies.