- This topic has 13 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
- Posts
Implied Agreement
This is where P has not expressly agreed that A should be his agent. However, the agreement can be implied from the parties’ conduct or relationship.Can you please give me an example where something like this happens.
Try this page …
findlaw.com.au
It’s an Australian site but nevertheless it’s good for answering your question
Which topics always get tested in CBE exam?? And which topics get tested in section B?
No answer to that I’m afraid – exams are no longer published
However, given the number of questions in the current format, I would find it extremely difficult to identify ANY topic that was not frequently and regularly examined
There’s no hiding place, sorry
Past consideration is sufficient to create liability on a bill of exchange. What does this mean??
Ok, point #1 – when next you change topics (you started this thread with Agency Law and we’re now into bills of exchange) please start a new thread
#2 Bills of exchange. You’re doing English law variant and bills of exchange are not in your syllabus. Therefore all you need to know is that past consideration is sufficient to support a bill of exchange
You don’t need any more than that!
If you were taking Global variant, then you would need to know about International Bills of Exchange … but you’re not, so you don’t!
Sorry about that, I got to know about that after I posted my comment. Thanks a lot.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.