Skip to content

ACCA Forums

SBR*** ACCA Paper SBR December 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

Oopentuition_teamAdmin7y ago
Please vote in our Instant Polls about the ACCA Paper SBR December 2018 Exam
December 2018 ACCA SBR exam — historical results
*** ACCA Paper SBR December 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments *** poll results
LLauren7y ago#61
Looking at the question paper again I don't think I've reached the 50 mark. In the P2 papers q1 was mostly numbers. I understand ACCA wanting student to do more application of knowledge rather than just number but I think it's unreasonable to make students do mostly written answers and making it mandatory to do 4 written questions rather than just 2 questions previously. It's very difficult to plan and write your answers for each question in such little time. I also prepared using the past exam questions on P2, the two specimen papers, the September paper and my ACCA approved question bank/study material. I felt well prepared that I had covered and understood a great deal of the topics but this exam has taught me that no matter what I covered it just wasn't enough.
KKarl7y ago#62
@ritaalbu said: What did you say in Q3 - b, recognizing the provision? and indicator of impairment? I said do not recognize the 3m provision as there is no obligation, and decline in price is an external indicator of impairment ..
I said not to recognise the provision as it is for future known expenses, and there is no legal obligation to do so. I stated that IAS37 states a provision is liability of uncertain timing and amount and should be recognised where a probable outflow of economic benefits will occur as a result of past events. On the indicators of impairment I mentioned changes in market conditions, operating losses and changes in Fair value can all be indicators of impairment.
HHanwen7y ago#63
Q1 the group cash flow was ok not too hard, wish I can score a pass mark However I think I'm wrong about the HFS classification, where the Watson can't be HSF as it is not available for sale at present condition because of the SBP Q2 the only challenging bit is the ifrs 16 and ias 40, in my opinion I think it's a finance lease as the majority of risk and reward has transferred to the lessee(40 years) so can't an investment property ,therefore overstate the profit and asset and therefore understate the gearing to protect the loan The revenue bit was easiest one Q3 A in analysing the NRV of different coal , I said the things related to ifrs 13 fvm ,and talked through it , don't think it would be good B easy C no control here as 52%less then 72% , and I used the control criterias to talk it through, and concluded that joint venture. Q4 management commentary , I read the articles , and I found the same qn in Kaplan kit Tax , i only talked the things that I known Such as the changes in tax rate is a change in accounting estimate Deferred tax assets criterias Deferred tax liability criterias If anyone agree with me
Former userFormer user7y ago#64
@hassanwaheed87 said: I did all the questions in BPP Revision Kit and all Mock exams. 3 of them in exam conditions. I still don't think I will pass. Question 4. I don't even know what it was about. I only wrote what I knew about Deferred Tax from my revision and that was it. I will probably have to try again in March :( This time I will use Kaplan's material.
KKarl7y ago#65
@wangbaichuan said: Q1 the group cash flow was ok not too hard, wish I can score a pass mark However I think I'm wrong about the HFS classification, where the Watson can't be HSF as it is not available for sale at present condition because of the SBP Q2 the only challenging bit is the ifrs 16 and ias 40, in my opinion I think it's a finance lease as the majority of risk and reward has transferred to the lessee(40 years) so can't an investment property ,therefore overstate the profit and asset and therefore understate the gearing to protect the loan The revenue bit was easiest one Q3 A in analysing the NRV of different coal , I said the things related to ifrs 13 fvm ,and talked through it , don't think it would be good B easy C no control here as 52%less then 72% , and I used the control criterias to talk it through, and concluded that joint venture. Q4 management commentary , I read the articles , and I found the same qn in Kaplan kit Tax , i only talked the things that I known Such as the changes in tax rate is a change in accounting estimate Deferred tax assets criterias Deferred tax liability criterias If anyone agree with me
Sounds like you are pretty accurate and the same as me on a lot of points. Just on the Control - I stated that as agreement was needed by 72% of the controlling interest, the other parties would not be able to take control as they would only represent 48% on acquisition of the additional 24%. I stated previously it was a joint arrangement under IFRS11 and that it now constitues control under IFRS10 - but I may be wrong, but I think so long as you list out the reasons why and show that you understand, and have studied the standards - you can grab some low hanging fruit. Best of luck!
HHanwen7y ago#66
Add me in the WhatsApp 15272151773
Bbogi12087y ago#67
It was unnecessarily difficult. The exam was deliberately tricky. The intention of the examiner was clearly not to test the knowledge but the be really mean and unfair. Also impossible to finish it on time for 2 reasons, I had to read the questions multiple times because they were not comprehensible and the fact that we still have to write with hands in 2018 is really ridiculous. My hand was cramping after 2 hours, I couldn't read my own writing from the last hour... I invested so much time in this one, not worth it...
Former userFormer user7y ago#68
I’ve received an email from ACCA which includes a survey where we can state our views on its fairness. If we all do this, hopefully this can help our situation.
Ggaby127y ago#69
@kbourne said: Hi guys. think we are all in the same boat here unfortunately. Very hard paper and lots of curveballs. Q4 was a killer. can anyone please advise on how the fair value of the coal would have been accounted for? I talked about fair values level 1 2 and 3 but wasn’t sure if I am honest. Could they have met the criteria of a Derivitive? HORRID paper I said the NRV should be calculated by taking the spot rates and future rates as being level 1 and level 2 valuations and derivatives should be used in order to protect the fall in value for the future transactions. Not sure is correct but this is how I answered.
KKarl7y ago#70
@gaby12 said: @kbourne said: Hi guys. think we are all in the same boat here unfortunately. Very hard paper and lots of curveballs. Q4 was a killer. can anyone please advise on how the fair value of the coal would have been accounted for? I talked about fair values level 1 2 and 3 but wasn’t sure if I am honest. Could they have met the criteria of a Derivitive? HORRID paper I said the NRV should be calculated by taking the spot rates and future rates as being level 1 and level 2 valuations and derivatives should be used in order to protect the fall in value for the future transactions. Not sure is correct but this is how I answered.
Hope you are correct because I mentioned if it meets the criteria for a Derivitive then they may be able to hedge for the risk under IFRS9! Can't believe Financial Instruments weren't covered. Went through so much pain learning and memorising!
OOpeyemi7y ago#71
This was my thoughts too. However, I said since it is financial lease, the revaluation reserve would not be included in the equity and thus resulting in a higher gearing.
@jamioio said: IFRS 16 Leases states that a lease is probably a finance lease if one or more of the following apply: 1) The lease term (including any secondary periods) is for the major part of the asset's economic life 2) At the inception of the lease, the present value of the lease payments amounts to at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset Both of these were found within the scenario text. The property could therefore be de-recognised as an asset, and re-recognised as a receivable discounted to present value. The discounting will lower the value of non-current assets and push gearing over the allowed limit. Further, the receivable is broken into non-current and current, again affecting the gearing ratio. I think this question is open to interpretation, perhaps the examiner will just want to see your point, and that it is well explained. I certainly appreciate the argument with regards to level 1 and 2 inputs. Personally, I found the IFRS 13 Fair Values element to be more useful in the ethical issues part of the question.
LLam7y ago#72
@wangbaichuan said: Q1 the group cash flow was ok not too hard, wish I can score a pass mark However I think I'm wrong about the HFS classification, where the Watson can't be HSF as it is not available for sale at present condition because of the SBP Q2 the only challenging bit is the ifrs 16 and ias 40, in my opinion I think it's a finance lease as the majority of risk and reward has transferred to the lessee(40 years) so can't an investment property ,therefore overstate the profit and asset and therefore understate the gearing to protect the loan The revenue bit was easiest one Q3 A in analysing the NRV of different coal , I said the things related to ifrs 13 fvm ,and talked through it , don't think it would be good B easy C no control here as 52%less then 72% , and I used the control criterias to talk it through, and concluded that joint venture. Q4 management commentary , I read the articles , and I found the same qn in Kaplan kit Tax , i only talked the things that I known Such as the changes in tax rate is a change in accounting estimate Deferred tax assets criterias Deferred tax liability criterias If anyone agree with me
Most of your opinion should say for mine except Watson and 3B For Watson, I think the fact that share options have been issued point out Watson is immediately ready for sale. Moreover, if the options holder choose to exercise then it is expected to complete in the next 12 months. But not for sure though. - About 3B, do you think the "forward contract" play any role in this scenario? At first I think it should be treated as a financial liability but cannot remember how the impairment indication for such things and choose to treat it like a regular contract as it trading commodity. For me 3A is really confusing, I have nothing to say about Conceptual Framework. And what should we use to calculate recoverable amount? I solely mention fair value on spot market at each year end, not sure whether forward market should be any part of it.
Former userFormer user7y ago#73
Really it was un-expected exam... so different form Specimen paper, Sep 18 exam and Kaplan revision kit, No Goodwill calculation, no Step acquisition or disposal I have doubt to pass this SBR
Aadam7y ago#74
Kindly all put your feedback on Acca student survey if you want to get across your message to Acca about this exam difficulty and the lack of knowledge in books about what was examined.
AAayisha afreen7y ago#75
Half the paper was conceptual framework exposure draft and i left that topic for revision. :(((((((((((((((
OOlanrewaju7y ago#76
I think the standard that applied in that question was IAS 40 investment property and not leases. Since the property was being kept for rentals, it can be rightly classified as an investment property.
OOlanrewaju7y ago#77
My answer was for them not to recognize a provision as there is no present obligation as a result of past event. There was no information in the question to suggest that the Company had created a constructive obligation as a result of them performing the reconditioning through past practices. Also, there was certainly no legal obligation on the Company to perform the reconditioning and the Company could change its plans on the reconditioning at any point in time.
WWajdan7y ago#78
It was all about framework... no consolidation, no major standards.... i am disappointed...
Vvinessen7y ago#79
i did not attempt the SBR paper this December i have not been able to complete my revision in due time had not been able to touch some chapters in the syllabus. reading all your feedbacks making me wondering whether to sit in March and continue this level 3 or i should drop and go for a master degree.
Xxxpetrou7y ago#80
It is going to be the toughest syllabus the next years, i am expecting that it will have 25%-30% of success, like it was P5. For sure i must read all articles in full and try to get the best out of it. I also think that various BPP and Kaplan exam kits, need to be revamped so as to reflect the actual exams difficulty. Disastrous exams.....
SSens7y ago#81
I have also done so ...it is unacceptable
SSCN7y ago#82
The fall in price is already anticipated as per 3(a) so I thought its not an impairment.
SSens7y ago#83
Someone posted earlier that SBR Dec18 has been uploaded by ACCA..I tried to find it but cannot locate ….however, have seen the question today in some other platform…surprisingly it is quite fast in the mkt!!
KKarl7y ago#84
@sudiptosen said: Someone posted earlier that SBR Dec18 has been uploaded by ACCA..I tried to find it but cannot locate ….however, have seen the question today in some other platform…surprisingly it is quite fast in the mkt!!
https://www.accaglobal.com/in/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-exams-study-resources/strategic-business-reporting/past-exam-papers.html
Ddon7y ago#85
ACCA EXAMINER TOOK REVENGE ON US FOR THE NEW PAPERS SBR DONT EXPEXT THIS
DCDaniel ChisomSupporter7y ago#86
Hello Guys, Can anyone in London lend me his or her SBR to help prepare for March 2019 exam? Thanks, Danny
Ttafadzwa7y ago#87
it was ok
GGanga7y ago#88
Disaster.
SSens7y ago#89
I think most of the present text books and exam kits are aligned to P2 and could be Kaplan/BPP are now planning to print materials aligned to new requirements of SBR...In the meantime you can try to understand requirements or principles of IFRS/IAS...can refer to summarised versions published by delloite, PWC or BDO
SSarah7y ago#90
Wow. I am scared. I also am using BPP books and wanted to attempt the exam in March. Based on this, I'm having second thoughts. Maybe I should just leave this paper for last and see how the past papers are coming.
Topic lockedNew replies are closed.