Financial Performance Measurement
1 Introduction
The financial performance of a company matters to shareholders, to senior management, to lenders, to potential investors and to many other stakeholder groups. The financial statements supply most of the information, but the figures in them have to be interpreted before they say anything about performance.
Ratio analysis is the standard tool. It is also the syllabus's own list of key performance indicators for a responsibility centre — profitability, liquidity, asset turnover, return on investment and economic value — so this chapter and chapter 5 are two halves of the same topic: chapter 5 asks whose performance is being measured, and this chapter asks with what.
Calculation is half the marks
The formulae must be learned. But a ratio calculated and not interpreted earns very little: what is examined is what the figure means — whether it should be higher or lower, what would have made it move, and what a reader should do about it.
2 Bases for comparison
This recording covers sections 2 to 9 and works every ratio in Example 1 on tape, with the interpretation as it goes. Every figure agrees with the printed answer and with this chapter.
Notice one. The recording predates IFRS 18. It arrives at the ratio numerator by explaining why “net profit” here means the profit before interest and tax rather than the bottom line — which is right, and section 5.2 adds what has changed since.
Notice two. Nothing on the tape covers the discussion that Example 1 actually asks for. The requirement is to discuss the performance of the business, and the tape (like the printed answer) computes the ratios and comments on them one at a time rather than drawing them together. Section 7's answer does both.
Notice three. The recording uses “PBIT” and “operating profit” as though they were the same thing. They are not interchangeable under IFRS 18: operating profit is the total of the operating category and a defined, required subtotal, while PBIT is a ratio-analysis convention. Section 5.2 sets out the distinction; use the wording there, not the wording on the tape.
Almost no ratio means anything on its own. (The current ratio in section 4.1 is the one partial exception.) A ratio takes on significance only when it is compared with something, and there are four bases:
Basis | What it tells you | What to be careful of |
The same company, earlier periods | The direction of travel — is the business improving? | One year's change may be noise. Look for a trend over three or more periods, and for a change of accounting policy that would break comparability. |
Similar companies, the same period | Whether the performance is good for this industry, rather than merely better than last year. | Genuinely comparable companies are hard to find, and their published data is a year old. |
Industry averages | The same, over a wider population, and usually the only external data available. | An average conceals a wide spread, and the definition of the ratio may not be yours. |
Targets and budget | Whether the company did what it set out to do. | A target that was set too easily flatters; see chapter 5, section 5.5. |
3 Profitability
3.1 Operating profit margin
Operating profit margin = (Profit before interest and tax ÷ Revenue) × 100%
How many cents of operating profit the company earns on each dollar of sales. Often called the net profit margin in ratio analysis — note that this does not mean the bottom-line profit after interest and tax. Interest is excluded because it depends on how the company is financed rather than on how well it trades, and tax because it is outside management's control.
3.2 Gross profit margin
Gross profit margin = (Gross profit ÷ Revenue) × 100%
The margin before any operating expenses, so it isolates selling prices, the cost of what is sold, and sales mix. Read it with the operating margin: if the gross margin is flat and the operating margin has risen, the improvement came from controlling overheads; if both moved by the same amount, overheads grew exactly in line with sales.
3.3 Return on capital employed
ROCE = (Profit before interest and tax ÷ Capital employed) × 100%
The single most important overall measure of profitability: it relates the return to the money tied up in earning it, so a bigger business is not automatically a better one. Note that the numerator is before interest because the denominator includes the debt that the interest was paid on — the ratio measures the return on all the long-term finance, from whatever source.
Capital employed can be reached two ways, and which you use depends only on what information the question gives you. They always give the same answer:
Capital employed = Share capital + reserves + long-term liabilities
Capital employed = Total assets − current liabilities
Return on capital employed and the return on investment of chapter 5 are the same calculation applied at different levels — the group in this chapter, one investment centre in that one. Both are named in P2C2b's list of key performance indicators.
3.4 Asset turnover
Asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Capital employed
How many dollars of sales the company generates from each dollar of long-term capital. Expressed as a number of times, not as a percentage. A falling asset turnover in a growing company usually means new capital has been raised faster than it has been put to work — which may be perfectly reasonable in the year an expansion is financed, and is a problem if it persists.
4 Liquidity and working capital
Profitability measures the long run. Liquidity measures whether the company survives to see it: more companies fail because they run out of cash than because they trade at a loss.
4.1 Current ratio
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
This is the one ratio that carries some meaning on its own: a company that cannot cover its short-term obligations from its short-term assets is in trouble. A ratio below 1, or falling steadily towards 1, is a warning. Above that there is no ideal figure — a manufacturer holding inventory will show a far higher current ratio than a service business that holds none, and a very high ratio can itself mean cash or inventory is being held idle.
4.2 Quick ratio (acid test)
Quick ratio = (Current assets − Inventory) ÷ Current liabilities
The same idea with inventory removed, because inventory is the slowest current asset to turn into cash: it has to be sold first and then collected. Receivables are left in, on the reasoning that they will be collected on roughly the same timescale as the payables have to be paid.
4.3 Inventory days
Inventory days = (Inventory ÷ Cost of sales) × 365
How many days of trading the inventory held would cover. Lower is generally better — capital is not tied up, and there is less risk of obsolescence — but too low risks stock-outs and lost sales.
4.4 Receivables days (average collection period)
Receivables days = (Trade receivables ÷ Revenue) × 365
How long customers take to pay. Strictly the denominator should be credit sales; where the split is not given, use revenue and say so.
4.5 Payables days (average payment period)
Payables days = (Trade payables ÷ Purchases) × 365
How long the company takes to pay its suppliers. Strictly the denominator is purchases; where purchases are not given — which is usual — use cost of sales and say that you have. It is tempting to read “longer is better”, and up to a point it is: supplier credit is free finance. Past that point suppliers stop supplying, or withdraw discounts, and the company has a far larger problem than the one it solved.
Compare the collection period with the payment period. A company collecting in 60 days and paying in 30 is financing its customers out of its own pocket. That may be a deliberate commercial choice; it is never an accident worth ignoring.
4.6 The working capital cycle
Working capital cycle (days) = Inventory days + Receivables days − Payables days
The number of days between paying for goods and collecting the cash from selling them, and therefore the number of days the company has to finance out of its own resources. It draws the three ratios above into one figure and is the most useful single liquidity measure for commenting on a trend.
5 Gearing
5.1 Gearing ratio
Gearing = (Long-term liabilities (debt) ÷ Shareholders' funds (equity)) × 100%
The proportion of the long-term finance that has been borrowed rather than raised from shareholders. Definitions differ — some measure debt against debt plus equity — so state which you are using and be consistent between the years you compare.
High gearing is neither good nor bad in itself:
Argument | |
For higher gearing | Interest is deductible for tax, so debt is a cheaper source of finance than equity, and the return to existing shareholders rises when a project earns more than the interest cost. |
Against higher gearing | More risk for shareholders, in two ways. Interest must be paid before any dividend, so a fall in profit hits the shareholders' return first and hardest. And on a liquidation, lenders rank ahead of shareholders, so the more that has been borrowed the less is likely to be left. |
5.2 Interest cover
Interest cover = PBIT ÷ Interest charge
How many times over the profit would cover the interest bill, and therefore how far profit could fall before the company could not pay it. Expressed as a number of times. A figure near 1 is alarming — a small fall in profit and the interest cannot be met, which is where companies fail. A figure in double figures means the interest is comfortably covered and there is capacity to borrow more.
PBIT here means profit before interest and tax — in Example 1, the $790 “profit from operations”. Do not equate it with IFRS 18's own subtotal, “profit before financing and income taxes”: PBIT is a ratio-analysis convention and that is a defined subtotal of the standard, and they are not the same thing. IFRS 18, effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, also requires operating profit as a subtotal — operating is the residual category, and operating profit is the total of that category — so from 2027 the numerator of the margin and ROCE ratios has a standard name and standard contents.
6 The DuPont relationship
Operating profit margin × Asset turnover = ROCE
It follows directly from the definitions — revenue cancels — and it is examinable both as a proof and as a route to a missing figure:
(PBIT ÷ Revenue) × (Revenue ÷ Capital employed) = PBIT ÷ Capital employed
What makes it worth learning is that it says there are exactly two ways to improve the most important profitability ratio: sell at a better margin, or generate more sales from the same capital. Any explanation of a movement in ROCE has to come down to one of those two, or to both moving in opposite directions — which is what happens in Example 1.
7 A worked interpretation
Statements of financial position as at 31 December ($000)
20X7 $ | 20X6 $ | |||
ASSETS | ||||
Non-current assets | ||||
Tangible assets | 1,341 | 826 | ||
Current assets | ||||
Inventory | 1,006 | 871 | ||
Trade receivables | 948 | 708 | ||
Cash | 360 | 100 | ||
2,314 | 1,679 | |||
TOTAL ASSETS | 3,655 | 2,505 | ||
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | ||||
Capital and reserves | ||||
$1 ordinary shares | 1,200 | 720 | ||
Retained profit | 990 | 681 | ||
2,190 | 1,401 | |||
Non-current liabilities | ||||
10% loan notes 20Y1 | 500 | 400 | ||
Current liabilities | ||||
Trade payables | 653 | 516 | ||
Tax payable | 228 | 140 | ||
Dividends payable | 84 | 48 | ||
965 | 704 | |||
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | 3,655 | 2,505 |
Statements of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December ($000)
20X7 $ | 20X6 $ | |
Revenue | 7,180 | 5,435 |
Cost of sales | (5,385) | (4,212) |
Gross profit | 1,795 | 1,223 |
Distribution costs | (335) | (254) |
Administrative expenses | (670) | (507) |
Profit from operations | 790 | 462 |
Finance costs | (50) | (52) |
Profit before taxation | 740 | 410 |
Income tax expense | (262) | (144) |
Profit after taxation | 478 | 266 |
Dividends | (169) | (95) |
Retained profit for the period | 309 | 171 |
Discuss the performance of the business above, using calculations and ratios to comment on profitability, liquidity and gearing levels.
Show answerHide answer
Use the results obtained for Example 1 to prove the DuPont relationship mathematically.
Show answerHide answer
8 Benchmarking
Benchmarking is the process of measuring an organisation's performance, products or processes against a chosen standard of excellence, and then acting on the difference. It is section 2's basis-for-comparison problem turned into a management technique, and P2C2b names it as a topic in its own right.
8.1 Internal and external benchmarking
Compared against | Strengths | Weaknesses | |
Internal | Another part of the same organisation — another division, branch, shift or period. | Data is available, comparable and cheap to obtain; definitions are already consistent; no confidentiality problem, and improvements transfer easily because the context is the same. | It can only make the organisation as good as its own best unit. If the whole organisation is behind its industry, internal benchmarking will never reveal it. |
External | Another organisation — a competitor, a company in a different industry, or an industry average. | It is the only way to find out whether the organisation is competitive, and it can import genuinely new practice rather than merely levelling up. | Data on competitors is hard to obtain and may be defined differently; a co-operative exercise raises confidentiality concerns; and what works in another context may not transfer. |
8.2 The four types
Type | What is compared |
Competitive | Performance against a direct competitor's. The most valuable comparison and the hardest data to get. |
Internal | Performance in one part of the organisation against another part. |
Functional | One function or activity — distribution, billing, call handling — against the same function in an organisation that excels at it, whatever industry it is in. |
Product | The organisation's own product against a competitor's, which may require reverse engineering. |
8.3 Why it matters, and what to watch
Benchmarking against a standard of excellence rather than an industry average is what makes it a tool of continuous improvement, which is why it sits naturally inside a total quality management environment (chapter 2): the target keeps moving, so the improvement never finishes.
It identifies the size of a gap but not its cause. The investigation is the work; the comparison is only what starts it.
Comparators must be genuinely comparable — accounting policies, scale, product mix, and the point of the business cycle.
Benchmarking what is easy to measure rather than what matters drives the same behaviour as any other badly chosen indicator (chapter 5, section 5.5).
It is inherently backward-looking and imitative: it can make an organisation as good as the best, and by itself will not make it better than the best.
9 Limitations of ratio analysis
Ratios are the basis of most key performance indicators and they are indispensable. They are also easy to over-read.
They are meaningless without a comparator — and the comparator must be prepared on the same basis. Different accounting policies for depreciation, inventory or development expenditure will produce different ratios for identical businesses.
Statement of financial position figures are a snapshot taken on one day, often the quietest day of the year, and set against a full year of trading. Seasonal businesses can look very different on 31 December from how they look in June.
They are based on profit, which is an opinion. Profit depends on estimates — depreciation, provisions, impairment, revenue cut-off — so it can be influenced by management without anything false being reported.
They are historical. They report what has happened, and every user of them wants to know what will happen.
They are entirely quantitative. No ratio captures the quality of the product, the strength of the brand, the state of the order book or the morale of the staff.
They are affected by inflation and by one-off items, both of which distort a year-on-year comparison unless they are identified and removed.
Used as targets they can be gamed. A ratio that determines a bonus is a ratio somebody has an incentive to move without improving the business — delaying a supplier payment at the year end improves the cash figure and nothing else.
The right conclusion is not that ratios should be distrusted, but that a ratio is the beginning of an investigation and not the end of one. It tells you where to look.
10 Beyond financial measures
The success of a business cannot be measured in financial data alone. Financial measures are backward-looking and can be improved in the short term by decisions that damage the business in the long term — cutting training, deferring maintenance, buying cheaper materials. A rounded view needs non-financial indicators alongside the ratios, and a framework for organising them. Both are the subject of chapter 8.
A ratio means nothing until it is compared — with earlier periods, with similar companies, with an industry average or with a target. Profitability: operating and gross margin, and ROCE, the single most important measure, which by the DuPont relationship is margin × asset turnover — so there are exactly two ways to improve it. Liquidity: current and quick ratios, and the working capital cycle (inventory days + receivables days − payables days). Gearing: debt to equity, and interest cover, which measures how far profit could fall before the interest could not be paid. Benchmarking turns comparison into a technique, internally against your own best unit and externally against somebody else's. And every ratio is a place to start an investigation, never a conclusion.
11 Test your knowledge
Two quick checks before you move on: work through the flashcards to fix this chapter’s key terms and definitions, then sit the objective questions for exam-style practice. Both mark themselves and explain the answers as you go.
Financial Performance Measurement
12 questionsAnswer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.
Open chapter practice