Skip to contentSkip to search

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment

CIMA Free Mock Exam

For most businesses property, plant and equipment is the largest number on the statement of financial position, and the one that takes the most judgement to arrive at. IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment answers four questions about it: what may be capitalised as part of the cost, how the cost is spread over the asset's life, whether the asset may be carried at a revalued amount, and what happens when it is sold.

Property, plant and equipment

Tangible items that are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for administrative purposes, and are expected to be used during more than one period.

Two points the definition does not say out loud. You do not have to own the item — what matters is that you control the economic benefits, which is the conceptual framework's definition of an asset (Chapter 4). And an asset still under construction is within IAS 16 from the start: it is property, plant and equipment being built, not something else.

These recordings predate IFRS 18 and say nothing about where their amounts land in the 2027 statement of profit or loss. That is this chapter’s closing section, “Where the numbers appear in the financial statements”.

Depreciation: in the change-of-method example, where the lecture divides the $26,214 carrying value by the five remaining years, deduct the $10,000 residual value first: $16,214 ÷ 5 = $3,243 (see “Changes in estimate”). $5,243 is the trap answer.

Accounting for a revaluation: this matters here, because the revaluation gain bypasses every profit-or-loss subtotal. The revaluation-surplus formula the recording narrates is set out in full in these notes.

YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video

1 Initial recognition

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is made up of:

  • The purchase price, including any irrecoverable taxes and after deducting trade discounts

  • Directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management

  • The initial estimate of dismantling and removal costs, and of restoring the site, where a present obligation to do so exists — measured at present value

Directly attributable costs are the unavoidable costs of getting the asset ready. The ones that come up in questions are site preparation, delivery and handling, installation and assembly, testing that the asset works as intended, and professional fees such as legal and surveyors' costs on a property purchase.

Dismantling costs are the exception that looks odd at first. An oil rig that must be removed from the seabed in fifty years' time creates an obligation today, so the present value of that future cost is capitalised as part of the rig now. You will always be given the present value; you are not asked to discount it yourself at F1.

1.1 What is not capitalised

  • Costs that are incidental to the construction, such as putting right an error

  • Start-up and pre-opening costs, including the marketing of a new facility

  • General overheads — although overheads incurred specifically on constructing the asset are directly attributable and may be capitalised

  • Operating losses incurred before the asset reaches its planned level of performance

Read discounts carefully. A trade discount is deducted at the point of sale, so it reduces the amount you capitalise. A settlement (cash or prompt-payment) discount is a reward for paying early — it has nothing to do with the cost of the asset and is never deducted from it. Questions put both in the same sentence precisely to see whether you deduct the wrong one.

Initial recognition

Jones purchases a machine that had a list price of $100,000 but was offered a trade discount of 10%. A further settlement discount of 5% is available if payment is made within 15 days.

Jones also incurred the following charges in getting the asset ready for its intended use:

$

Shipping and handling charges

3,500

Pre-production testing

12,000

Site preparation costs

17,000

General overheads

4,500

Included in the site preparation costs is $3,000 which arose because Jones provided incorrect requirements for the asset.

Calculate the initial cost of the machine to be recorded in accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment.

Show answerHide answer

Initial recognition

$

Purchase price (100,000 less 10% trade discount)

90,000

Shipping and handling charges

3,500

Pre-production testing

12,000

Site preparation costs (17,000 – 3,000 error)

14,000

Cost of the machine

119,500

The 5% settlement discount is ignored: it is a reward for paying the supplier quickly, not a reduction in the cost of the asset.

Two amounts are expensed rather than capitalised — the $4,500 of general overheads and the $3,000 of site preparation caused by Jones's own error, $7,500 in total. A question can ask for either figure, so work out both.

2 Subsequent expenditure

Money spent on an asset after it is in use is capitalised only if it improves the asset beyond its originally assessed standard of performance — a factory extension, or a modification that makes a machine produce more units or better-quality units. Anything that merely restores the asset to the performance already expected of it is repairs and maintenance, and is expensed.

2.1 Separate components

Where an item of property, plant and equipment is made up of components with different useful lives, each component is capitalised and depreciated separately. An aircraft is the standard illustration: the airframe, the engines and the cabin interior all wear out over very different periods, so the total cost is split and each part is depreciated over its own life.

2.2 Inspection and overhaul costs

Routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. A major inspection or overhaul is different: where the asset cannot legally or practically go on being used without it, the cost of the inspection is capitalised as a separate component and depreciated over the period to the next inspection. Any amount still held for the previous inspection is derecognised at that point.

3 Depreciation

Depreciation is the systematic allocation of an asset's depreciable amount — cost (or revalued amount) less residual value — over its useful life. The two methods you need are:

  • Straight line — (cost less residual value) ÷ useful life, giving the same charge every year

  • Reducing balance — carrying value × a fixed percentage, giving a large charge early in the asset's life and a small one late

Straight line suits an asset that delivers even benefits across its life; reducing balance suits one that delivers most of its benefit early.

Depreciation starts when the asset is ready for its intended use, not when it is first used. An asset ready in August but not switched on until November is depreciated from August.

3.1 Changes in estimate

Useful life, residual value and depreciation method are estimates, and IAS 16 requires them to be reviewed at least at each reporting date. Revising one is a change in accounting estimate, not the correction of an error, so it is applied prospectively: you never go back and restate earlier years. The rule to hold on to is one line long — apply the new estimate to the carrying value at the date of change, over the remaining useful life.

When you switch to the straight-line method, remember the residual value. The charge is (carrying value at the date of change − residual value) ÷ remaining life. Dividing the carrying value by the remaining life and forgetting the residual value is the single most common slip in this area, and it is exactly what Example 3 is built to catch.

Change in useful life

Ecuador bought an item of property, plant and equipment for $25 million on 1 January 20X2 and depreciated it on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years.

On 31 December 20X4 the asset's remaining life was estimated as 5 years.

Calculate the amounts to be shown in the financial statements of Ecuador for the year ended 31 December 20X5.

Show answerHide answer

Change in useful life

Apply the new life to the carrying value at the date of change.

$m

Cost (1 January 20X2)

25.0

Depreciation 20X2–20X4 (25.0 ÷ 10 years × 3 years)

(7.5)

Carrying value at 31 December 20X4

17.5

Depreciation 20X5 (17.5 ÷ 5 remaining years)

(3.5)

Carrying value at 31 December 20X5

14.0

So the statement of profit or loss for 20X5 carries a depreciation charge of $3.5 million within the operating category, and the statement of financial position shows the asset at $14 million. The first three years' charges are left exactly as they were.

Change in method

A lorry was purchased for $80,000 on 1 January 20X4 when its useful life was estimated to be ten years with a residual value of $10,000. A depreciation policy of 20% reducing balance was selected.

On 1 January 20X9 the directors decided that, to give a fair presentation, a straight-line policy over the useful economic life should be followed instead. There has been no change in the estimated useful economic life as a result.

What is the depreciation charge for the year ended 31 December 20X9?

Show answerHide answer

Change in method

The new method is applied to the carrying value at the date of change. Five years have been depreciated (20X4 to 20X8), so five years of the useful life remain.

The quick route: 20% reducing balance leaves 80% of the balance each year, so after five years the carrying value is $80,000 × 0.85 = $26,214.

The long route, if you want to see it:

$

Cost (1 January 20X4)

80,000

Depreciation 20X4 (80,000 × 20%)

(16,000)

Carrying value 31 December 20X4

64,000

Depreciation 20X5 (64,000 × 20%)

(12,800)

Carrying value 31 December 20X5

51,200

Depreciation 20X6 (51,200 × 20%)

(10,240)

Carrying value 31 December 20X6

40,960

Depreciation 20X7 (40,960 × 20%)

(8,192)

Carrying value 31 December 20X7

32,768

Depreciation 20X8 (32,768 × 20%)

(6,554)

Carrying value 31 December 20X8

26,214

Now apply straight line over the remaining five years, after deducting the residual value, which has not changed:

$

Carrying value at 31 December 20X8

26,214

Residual value

(10,000)

Depreciable amount

16,214

Depreciation charge for 20X9 (16,214 ÷ 5 years)

3,243

Dividing $26,214 by 5 and forgetting the $10,000 residual value gives $5,243 — a wrong answer that is always one of the distractors.

4 Subsequent measurement: cost model or revaluation model

After initial recognition an entity chooses, for each class of asset, between two models:

Cost model

Revaluation model

The asset is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

The asset is carried at its revalued amount — fair value at the date of revaluation — less subsequent accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

The revaluation model comes with conditions, all aimed at stopping companies from picking and choosing the flattering numbers:

  • Revaluations must be kept up to date, so they are reviewed regularly enough that carrying value does not differ materially from fair value

  • The policy applies to a whole class of asset — you cannot revalue one favourable building and leave the rest at cost

  • Assets are revalued to fair value

  • The revalued amount, less residual value, is then depreciated over the remaining useful life

5 Accounting for a revaluation

On revaluation the asset is written up to fair value and the accumulated depreciation held against it is eliminated. The double entry is:

Dr

Non-current assets – cost/valuation

X

Dr

Accumulated depreciation

X

Cr

Other comprehensive income – revaluation surplus

X

You rarely need the individual debits. The credit — the gain — can be calculated in one step, using the fair value and the carrying value at the date of the revaluation:

Revaluation surplus = Fair value − Carrying value

An upward revaluation is recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulates in the revaluation surplus. It does not go through profit or loss, because the gain has not been realised — nothing has been sold. Reporting a revaluation gain as profit is a genuine error, not a policy choice.

There is one exception, and it is the mirror image of the next rule. If the same asset had previously been written down and that decrease was charged to profit or loss, a later increase is recognised in profit or loss to the extent that it reverses that earlier charge; only the excess goes to other comprehensive income.

A downward revaluation works the other way round: it is charged against any revaluation surplus previously recognised for that same asset through other comprehensive income, and only the excess goes to profit or loss.

After the revaluation, depreciation is charged on the new, higher carrying value, so the annual charge rises. The entity may — it is optional — transfer that excess depreciation from the revaluation surplus to retained earnings each year, making the gain distributable as it is earned:

Dr

Revaluation surplus

X

Cr

Retained earnings

X

The excess is the depreciation on the revalued amount less the depreciation that would have been charged on the original cost. This transfer is a movement between reserves shown in the statement of changes in equity (Chapter 5). It is not income, so it appears in neither profit or loss nor other comprehensive income.

Revaluation

Charlie bought a building on 1 January 20X5 for $500,000 with an estimated useful economic life of twenty-five years and no residual value. A straight-line method of depreciation was adopted.

On 1 January 20X7 Charlie decided to revalue all non-current assets in line with IAS 16. The building was revalued at $600,000. The useful economic life is unchanged. Charlie makes the annual transfer of excess depreciation.

Show how the revaluation would be accounted for in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X7.

Show answerHide answer

Revaluation

Workings

$

Cost (1 January 20X5)

500,000

Accumulated depreciation (500,000 ÷ 25 × 2 years)

(40,000)

Carrying value at 31 December 20X6

460,000

Revalued amount at 1 January 20X7

600,000

Revaluation gain (600,000 – 460,000)

140,000

Remaining useful life is 23 years, so depreciation for 20X7 is $600,000 ÷ 23 = $26,087, against $20,000 on the old basis. The excess depreciation transferred is $6,087.

Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (extract)

$

Depreciation (operating category)

(26,087)

Other comprehensive income – gain on revaluation

140,000

Statement of financial position (extract)

$

Property, plant and equipment (600,000 – 26,087)

573,913

Revaluation surplus (140,000 – 6,087)

133,913

Statement of changes in equity (extract)

Revaluation surplus $

Retained earnings $

Balance brought forward

–

X

Revaluation in the year

140,000

–

Transfer of excess depreciation

(6,087)

6,087

Balance carried forward

133,913

X

6 Disposal of a previously revalued asset

The profit or loss on disposal is calculated exactly as it always was — proceeds less the carrying value at the date of sale — and goes to profit or loss. The revaluation surplus still held for that asset is now realised, so it is transferred to retained earnings:

Dr

Revaluation surplus

X

Cr

Retained earnings

X

That transfer is a movement within equity. It never passes through profit or loss, so the gain on revaluation is never reported as profit — not even on disposal.

Disposal of a revalued asset

William bought a building on 1 January 20X5 for $400,000 with an estimated useful economic life of twenty-five years and no residual value. A straight-line method of depreciation was adopted.

On 1 January 20X7 William decided to revalue all non-current assets in line with IAS 16. The building was revalued at $500,000. The useful economic life is unchanged, and William makes the annual transfer of excess depreciation.

On 1 January 20X9 William disposed of the building for $550,000.

Calculate the profit or loss on disposal of the building at 1 January 20X9 and record the journal entry transferring the previously held gains within reserves.

Show answerHide answer

Disposal of a revalued asset

Workings

$

Cost (1 January 20X5)

400,000

Accumulated depreciation (400,000 ÷ 25 × 2 years)

(32,000)

Carrying value at 31 December 20X6

368,000

Revalued amount at 1 January 20X7

500,000

Revaluation gain (500,000 – 368,000)

132,000

Depreciation 20X7 and 20X8 (500,000 ÷ 23 × 2 years)

(43,478)

Carrying value at 31 December 20X8

456,522

Depreciation on the old basis would have been $16,000 a year, so the excess transferred across the two years is $43,478 − $32,000 = $11,478, leaving a revaluation surplus of $132,000 − $11,478 = $120,522 at the date of disposal.

Profit on disposal

Proceeds

550,000

Carrying value at the date of disposal

(456,522)

Profit on disposal (profit or loss)

93,478

Transfer of the realised revaluation surplus

Dr

Revaluation surplus

120,522

Cr

Retained earnings

120,522

Note what does not happen: the $120,522 is not added to the $93,478 profit on disposal. Only the $93,478 reaches profit or loss.

7 Where the numbers appear in the financial statements

IAS 16 is unchanged by IFRS 18, but where its figures land is worth fixing in your mind, because presentation questions and preparation questions are marked on exactly this:

  • Depreciation, and any impairment of an asset used in the business, are expenses of the main business activities, so they sit in the operating category — above operating profit, the first of the two required subtotals (Chapter 5)

  • A gain on revaluation is other comprehensive income. It sits below profit for the year and therefore affects none of the profit-or-loss subtotals

  • The transfer of excess depreciation, and the transfer of the realised surplus on disposal, are movements between reserves and appear only in the statement of changes in equity

  • A profit or loss on disposal is part of profit or loss, in the operating category for an asset used in the business

The disclosure that pulls it all together is a reconciliation, for each class of asset, of the opening to the closing carrying amount — showing additions, disposals, revaluations, depreciation and impairment losses for the year.

8 Test your knowledge

Two quick checks before you move on: work through the flashcards to fix this chapter’s terms and definitions, then sit the objective questions for exam-style practice. Both mark themselves and explain the answers as you go.

Practice questions

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment

21 questions

Answer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.

Open chapter practice