Skip to contentSkip to search

Investment Appraisal

CIMA Free Mock Exam
CIMA-BA2 · Chapter 20
  1. Investment Appraisal

Investment appraisal decides whether a capital investment – a new machine, building or project – is worthwhile. BA2 uses three techniques, all based on cash flows:

  • Net present value (NPV) – discount every cash flow at the cost of capital and add them up; accept if the NPV is positive.

  • Internal rate of return (IRR) – the interest rate at which the NPV is zero, estimated from two NPVs; accept if it is above the cost of capital.

  • Payback period – how long it takes to get the original investment back (the discounted payback period does the same with discounted cash flows); the shorter the better.

1 Introduction

In this chapter we will apply the discounting techniques covered in the previous chapter to the appraisal of capital investments.

The decisions are based on the cash the investment will pay out and bring in – not on accounting profit. Only relevant cash flows count (chapter 18): the future cash that changes because the investment is made. Unless told otherwise, assume that the initial cost is paid now (time 0) and that the other cash flows arise at the ends of the years (time 1 = one year from now, and so on).

2 Net Present Value

YouTube video

Under this approach to investment appraisal we look at all the expected cash flows that will arise from an investment.

If overall the investment generates a cash surplus then we will accept and invest; if however there is an overall cash deficit then we will reject the investment.

However, we also need to take into account interest on the investment in the project. This is either because we have needed to borrow money and therefore be paying interest, or because we are using money that could otherwise have been invested and be earning interest.

In either case, we account for the interest by discounting the future cash flows to get the present value. The overall surplus or deficit is known as the Net Present Value.

Decision rule: if the NPV is positive, accept the investment; if it is negative, reject it. A positive NPV means the investment earns more than the cost of capital – it is the surplus, in today’s money, after paying for the interest.

Discount each year’s cash flow with the discount factor for that year (from the present value table). If the same amount arises every year, the annuity factor can be used instead (chapter 19). The factors used in this chapter are:

Year

10%

15%

0

1.000

1.000

1

0.909

0.870

2

0.826

0.756

3

0.751

0.658

4

0.683

0.572

5

0.621

0.497

A new project will cost $80,000 and is expected to last 4 years. At the end of 4 years it is expected to have a scrap value of $10,000.

The project is expected to generate operating cash flows each year as follows:

Year

Operating cash flow ($)

1

20,000

2

30,000

3

40,000

4

10,000

Assume that all operating cash flows occur at the ends of years.

If interest is 10% p.a., calculate the Net Present Value of the project and state your decision as to whether or not we should invest.

Show answerHide answer

Year

Cash
flow

Discount
factor
@ 10%

Present
value

$

$

0

(80,000)

1.000

(80,000)

1

20,000

0.909

18,180

2

30,000

0.826

24,780

3

40,000

0.751

30,040

4

20,000

0.683

13,660

Net present value

6,660

Year 4’s cash flow is the operating cash flow of $10,000 plus the scrap value of $10,000 = $20,000.

The net present value is positive (+$6,660) and therefore we should invest in the project.

3 Internal Rate of Return

YouTube video

One problem in practice with basing our decision on the Net Present Value is that it will usually be impossible for a company to determine their cost of capital (or interest cost) accurately.

In these circumstances, it is therefore often useful to calculate a ‘breakeven’ interest rate of the project.

This is known as the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and is the rate of interest at which the project gives a NPV of zero.

The higher the interest rate, the lower the NPV. So the IRR is estimated by calculating the NPV at two rates – ideally one giving a positive NPV and one a negative NPV – and assuming the NPV falls in a straight line between them:

IRR = lower rate + [NPV at lower rate ÷ (NPV at lower rate − NPV at higher rate)] × (higher rate − lower rate)

(If the NPV at the higher rate is negative, ‘minus a negative’ means its size is added: 6,660 − (−2,160) = 8,820.)

Decision rule: accept the investment if its IRR is higher than the cost of capital. The IRR also shows the margin for error: if the cost of capital is thought to be 10% and the IRR is nearly 14%, the estimate of the cost of capital could be quite wrong and the decision would still be right.

For the project detailed in Example 1:

Calculate the net present value at interest of 15% and hence estimate the Internal Rate of Return of the project.

Show answerHide answer

Year

Cash
flow

Discount
factor
@ 15%

Present
value

$

$

0

(80,000)

1.000

(80,000)

1

20,000

0.870

17,400

2

30,000

0.756

22,680

3

40,000

0.658

26,320

4

20,000

0.572

11,440

Net present value

(2,160)

At 10% the NPV is +6,660 (Example 1); at 15% it is −2,160. Between the two rates (5 percentage points) the NPV falls by 6,660 + 2,160 = 8,820. To fall to zero from 10% it must fall by 6,660:

IRR = 10% + [6,660 ÷ (6,660 + 2,160)] × 5% = 10% + 3.78% = 13.78%

The IRR (13.78%) is higher than the cost of capital (10%), so the project should be accepted – the same decision as the NPV.

05101520-10010203040Interest rate (%)NPV ($000)NPV of the projectZero NPV

The graph shows the project’s NPV at different interest rates (red dots: the two NPVs calculated above). The NPV falls as the rate rises and crosses zero at the IRR. Because the line is really a slight curve, the straight-line estimate of 13.78% is only approximate – the exact IRR of this project is about 13.7%. This is why the two rates used should be close to the IRR, and why the exam will tell you which rates to use.

4 Payback Period

YouTube video

One problem with basing decisions on the net present value of a project is that the cash flows are only estimates, and if the estimates are wrong then the decision could be wrong.

It is likely to be the earlier cash flows that are the most certain whereas the further into the future that we are estimating the more uncertain the cash flows are likely to be.

The payback period is the number of years it takes to get back the original investment in cash terms. The shorter the payback period, the more certain we are that the project will actually pay for itself.

The discounted payback period is exactly the same except that it takes into account the time value of money by measuring how many years it takes to get back the original investment looking at the discounted cash flow each year.

Payback is found by adding up the cash inflows year by year (the cumulative cash inflow) until they reach the original investment. If it is recovered part-way through a year, the part of the year is usually estimated by assuming the cash comes in evenly through that year. The payback period ignores everything after payback, so it is used alongside NPV, not instead of it.

A new project will cost $100,000 and will last for 5 years with no scrap value.

The project is expected to generate operating cash flows each year as follows:

Year

Operating cash flow ($)

1

20,000

2

30,000

3

40,000

4

50,000

5

30,000

The cost of capital is 10%.

(a)   Calculate the payback period

(b)   Calculate the discounted payback period

Show answerHide answer

Initial investment: $100,000.

Year

Cash
inflow

Cumulative
cash inflow

$

$

1

20,000

20,000

2

30,000

50,000

3

40,000

90,000

4

50,000

140,000

5

30,000

170,000

(a) After 3 years $90,000 has been recovered; $10,000 more is needed out of the year-4 inflow of $50,000.

Payback period = 3 + 10,000 ÷ 50,000 = 3.2 years (or ‘within 4 years’)

Year

Cash
inflow

Discount
factor
@ 10%

Discounted
cash inflow

Cumulative
discounted
cash inflow

$

$

$

1

20,000

0.909

18,180

18,180

2

30,000

0.826

24,780

42,960

3

40,000

0.751

30,040

73,000

4

50,000

0.683

34,150

107,150

5

30,000

0.621

18,630

125,780

(b) After 3 years $73,000 of discounted cash has been recovered; $27,000 more is needed out of the year-4 discounted inflow of $34,150.

Discounted payback period = 3 + 27,000 ÷ 34,150 = 3.79 years (or ‘within 4 years’)

The discounted payback period is always longer than the simple payback period, because discounting makes each year’s inflow smaller. Strictly, discounting assumes each cash flow arrives at the end of its year, so the discounted payback is sometimes stated simply as ‘within 4 years’ rather than apportioned.

Method

Decision rule

Takes account of the time value of money?

Net present value

Accept if positive

Yes

Internal rate of return

Accept if higher than the cost of capital

Yes

Payback period

The shorter the better

No

Discounted payback period

The shorter the better

Yes

5 Test your knowledge

Two quick checks before you move on: work through the flashcards to fix this chapter’s terms and definitions, then sit the objective questions for exam-style practice. Both mark themselves and explain the answers as you go.

Practice questions

Investment Appraisal

7 questions

Answer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.

Open chapter practice