Skip to contentSkip to search

Non-Financial Performance Measurement

CIMA Free Mock Exam

Financial measures report the past. To grow in the long term a business must also measure the things that drive future profit – customer satisfaction, efficiency, quality, innovation and the skills of its staff. These are non-financial performance measures.

The best-known framework is Kaplan and Norton’s balanced scorecard, with its four perspectives: customer, process efficiency, growth and financial. The chapter works a restaurant example, lists the common non-financial indicators for manufacturing and service businesses, and explains the four features of service industries – intangibility, variability, simultaneity and perishability – that make their performance harder to measure.

1 Introduction

YouTube video

The lecture works Example 1 under the restaurant’s old name; the figures are the same as here. Section 3 (the table of non-financial indicators and Illustration 1) is in the written notes only.

In the previous chapter we looked at various measures of financial performance. However it is important to have a range of performance measures considering non-financial as well as financial matters. This is particularly important in the case of service businesses where such things as quality are of vital importance if the business is to grow in the long-term.

In this chapter we will consider the various areas where performance measures are likely to be needed.

Various authors have summarised the areas in different ways – the best known one is Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard. You will not be tested specifically on Kaplan and Norton, but you should be aware of the areas that they consider important and be able to suggest performance indicators under the various headings.

2 Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard

Detailed knowledge of the balanced scorecard is not required at BA2. Know the four perspectives and be able to suggest – and calculate – sensible measures under each heading, as in Example 1.

Kaplan and Norton stated the importance of having a range of performance measures and forming a balance between them. They grouped them under the following headings, which they called perspectives:

  • Customer satisfaction perspective

  • Process efficiency (or internal business process) perspective

  • Growth (or learning and growth, or innovation and learning) perspective

  • Financial perspective

Three of the four perspectives are mostly non-financial. The point is balance: a business that watches only its financial results may miss the problems with customers, processes or staff that will reduce its profits in the future.

Perspective

The question it asks

Examples of measures

Customer satisfaction

How do our customers see us?

Number of new and returning customers; customer complaints; customer satisfaction scores; on-time delivery; market share

Process efficiency (internal business process)

What must we be good at, and are we efficient?

Time to make a unit or serve a customer; waiting time; reject rate; capacity utilisation; staff turnover

Growth (learning and growth; innovation and learning)

Can we keep improving and creating value?

Proportion of revenue from new products; number of new products launched; training time or training days per employee

Financial

How do we look to our shareholders?

Return on capital employed; profit margins; revenue growth; spend per customer

A business first sets goals under each perspective, then chooses measures that show whether each goal is being achieved, and compares them over time.

Masala House is an Indian restaurant that wishes to implement a balanced scorecard approach and has established the following goals for each of the balanced scorecard perspectives:

Perspective

Goals

Customer perspective

To increase the number of new and returning customers

Process efficiency perspective

To reduce the customer waiting time; to reduce staff turnover

Learning and growth perspective

To increase the proportion of revenue from new meals; to increase the % of training time for staff

Financial perspective

To increase the spend per customer; to increase the gross profit margin

The following information is also available for the year just ended (2017) and for the previous year (2016):

2016

2017

Total customers

27,800

29,000

– of which are new customers

6,500

8,200

– of which are returning customers

21,300

20,800

Customer complaints

820

1,050

Waiting time for order to arrive

15 minutes

25 minutes

% staff turnover

15%

30%

% of time that staff spend training

4%

2%

Revenue

$252,000

$302,000

– revenue from new meals

$26,000

$64,000

– revenue from existing meals

$226,000

$238,000

Gross profit

$51,000

$64,000

Calculate appropriate measures, and comment on whether or not Masala House has achieved its goals.

Show answerHide answer

Perspective and goal

2016

2017

Goal achieved?

Customer: total customers

27,800

29,000

Up 4%

Customer: new customers

6,500

8,200

Yes – up 26%

Customer: returning customers

21,300

20,800

No – down 2%

Customer: complaints per 1,000 customers (820 ÷ 27.8; 1,050 ÷ 29.0)

29.5

36.2

(not a goal – but worse)

Process efficiency: waiting time

15 minutes

25 minutes

No

Process efficiency: staff turnover

15%

30%

No

Learning and growth: revenue from new meals ÷ total revenue (26,000 ÷ 252,000; 64,000 ÷ 302,000)

10.3%

21.2%

Yes

Learning and growth: % of time spent training

4%

2%

No

Financial: spend per customer (252,000 ÷ 27,800; 302,000 ÷ 29,000)

$9.06

$10.41

Yes

Financial: gross profit margin (51,000 ÷ 252,000; 64,000 ÷ 302,000)

20.2%

21.2%

Yes – slightly

Comment.

Customer. Total customers have risen and new customers are up strongly, so part of the goal is met. But returning customers have fallen, and complaints have risen both in number and per customer. Customers who come back are customers who are satisfied, so the fall is a warning sign.

Process efficiency. Neither goal has been achieved. Customers wait on average 25 minutes instead of 15, and staff turnover has doubled to 30%. The two are probably linked: new staff are slower than experienced staff, and slow service may explain the extra complaints and the fall in returning customers.

Learning and growth. The restaurant is innovating – revenue from new meals has risen from about 10% to 21% of the total. But training time has halved at the very time when so many new staff are joining, which may make the service problems worse.

Financial. Both goals have been met: customers spend more on average ($10.41 against $9.06) and the gross profit margin has risen slightly. The higher spend may come from the new meals or from higher prices; if prices have risen, that could also be one reason why fewer customers return.

Overall, the financial results look good this year, but the non-financial measures show problems – staff turnover, training, waiting time and returning customers – that need to be investigated now, or profits are likely to fall in the future.

3 Non-financial performance indicators

Non-financial measures can be calculated for any kind of business. The ones you choose must suit the business and its critical success factors (chapter 10). Common examples:

Measure

How it is calculated

Context

Labour productivity

Units produced ÷ labour hours worked

Manufacturing (output per hour); services use, e.g., customers served per hour

Reject rate

Units rejected ÷ units produced × 100%

Manufacturing – quality

On-time delivery

Orders delivered on time ÷ total orders × 100%

Manufacturing, retail and delivery services

Capacity utilisation

Hours (or units, rooms, seats) used ÷ hours available × 100%

Factories (machine hours); hotels (room occupancy); airlines (seats filled)

Customer complaints

Number of complaints, or complaints per 1,000 customers

All businesses – customer satisfaction

Average waiting time

Total waiting time ÷ number of customers

Restaurants, banks, hospitals, call centres

Staff turnover

Staff leaving in the year ÷ average number of staff × 100%

All businesses – process efficiency and staff morale

Innovation

Revenue from new products ÷ total revenue × 100%

All businesses – growth

A furniture maker produced 12,000 desks last month using 30,000 labour hours. 240 desks were rejected by quality control. 1,880 of its 2,000 customer orders were delivered on time, and its machines ran for 8,500 of the 10,000 machine hours available.

Measure

Working

Result

Labour productivity

12,000 ÷ 30,000

0.4 desks per hour

Reject rate

240 ÷ 12,000 × 100%

2%

On-time delivery

1,880 ÷ 2,000 × 100%

94%

Capacity utilisation

8,500 ÷ 10,000 × 100%

85%

On their own these figures mean little. Like the financial ratios, they are compared with targets, with previous periods and with similar businesses.

No single measure should be used on its own. A manager judged only on one measure will concentrate on it at the expense of everything else – a restaurant judged only on waiting time might rush customers and let quality fall. That is the reason for a balanced range of measures.

4 Service versus manufacturing businesses

Although the same perspectives and approach for measuring performance can be used for both service and manufacturing industries, there are more difficulties involved in both the costing and the performance measurement for service industries.

There are four main features of service industries that make them different from manufacturing industries:

Feature

What it means

Why it makes performance harder to measure

Intangibility

A service cannot be touched or seen in the way a product can – a dental treatment, a haircut, an audit

Quality and output are hard to measure; a desk can be inspected, a tooth that has been taken out cannot

Variability

Every service is slightly different, because each customer and each job is different – no two fillings are exactly the same

It is hard to set a standard and check each job against it, as a factory checks hundreds of identical products

Simultaneity

The service is produced and consumed at the same time – the customer receives it as it is given

Quality cannot be checked before the customer receives it, unlike a product checked before it leaves the factory

Perishability

A service cannot be stored: an empty hotel room or an unsold seat on tonight’s flight is lost for ever, and once the service has been used it is gone

Capacity left unused cannot be sold later, and a service cannot be returned or re-examined afterwards – once a meal is eaten, any fault is hard to check

Because of these four features, a service business relies even more on measures such as customer complaints, customer satisfaction surveys, returning customers and waiting times – as Masala House did in Example 1. Costing is harder too: a service has no physical unit, so the business must choose a suitable measure of output, such as a patient-day in a hospital, a room-night in a hotel or a chargeable hour in a firm of accountants (see chapter 13).

5 Test your knowledge

Two quick checks before you move on: work through the flashcards to fix this chapter’s terms and definitions, then sit the objective questions for exam-style practice. Both mark themselves and explain the answers as you go.

Practice questions

Non-Financial Performance Measurement

12 questions

Answer the questions one at a time. Your progress is saved so you can leave and come back.

Open chapter practice