summary

Summary dismissal is not always unfair And an employee who resigns has not been dismissed. (If you leave your job and give in your notice, you have not been dismissed! You've left!)

thank you sir! Ive got couple of other questions, please. "in low of tort, there should not be any relationship between claimant and defendant for the defendant to be liable." i dont understand...

Where's that quote from? And you said that you had a couple of questions - that's just one!

in bpp book. what's right then, sir??

2nd question: "Where there are multiple possible causes, the court must establish that the negligent act was the one that caused the injury. If this is not possible then causality is not established. what is causality? i dont understand what's the position of courts in considering the negligence in law of tort...

I've never heard the quote before and I've never considered that the two parties should be unrelated In one case, the court determined that the plaintiff's condition could have been caused by any number of reasons and was thus unable to tie the condition into the particular one that was the subject of the alleged negligence Does that answer it?

yeah!! Thank you!

sir, one more. Obiter dicta (junior judges word) is not binding at any later cases. Is it all that we should know in this exam? if anything else, could you add up please. Thank you!

That's all you need! (hopefully!)