- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- Posts
Hi Mike,
Appreciate your immense efforts on this platform.I’d like to ask on this case, did you mean that Securicor was able to escape the liability of their pyromaniac employee burning down their clients building with the exclusion clause??
You didn’t state clearly the end result of the case.
Thanks a lot!
Sorry! I missed your question when I was answering your other post.
In the Securicor case, the Court of Appeal accepted Photo-Productions’ argument that Securicor should be liable
BUT! Securicor took their appeal to the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) and that Court overturned The Court of Appeal decision
In very brief summary – Securicor won their case
OK?
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.