• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Paladin- Depreciation Issue

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Paladin- Depreciation Issue

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 1, 2015 at 6:23 pm #286810
    PoLishED
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆☆

    sir wanna ask for adjustment of paladin december 2011 question of consolidation. Its 2nd adjustment cannot make it though actually its depreciation making issue for me.
    I think depr. of $1000 (4000/4) should make entries of Dr. depreciation $1000 Cr. $800 to consolidated reserves and $200 to NCI
    similarly, $500 (3000/6) Dr. depreciation $500 Cr. consolidated reserves $400 and $100 to NCI

    but what originally happened is not making sense for me kindly help me please
    its disturbing

    December 1, 2015 at 6:35 pm #286815
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Rather than split every separate adjustment into “us” and “them”, why not feed all the adjustments into a single working in full and then allocate to “us” and “them”

    I think that you’ll find that the end result is the same but your way is slower and more cumbersome

    December 2, 2015 at 3:13 am #286866
    PoLishED
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆☆

    ok

    I should make adjustments to RE of subsidiary and then as whole should allocate in 80 and 20%

    December 2, 2015 at 8:47 am #286912
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Correct – much easier 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in