- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
when remove Swanson (subsidiary), why the COS of Pirkin on P’s individual statement does not add back $1m?
In normal consolidation, we have:
COS (G) = COS (P) + COS (S) – Intra sale + URP=> COS (P) should be = COS (G) – COS (S) + Intra sale – URP
Where do I put it wrong?
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.