Hello, I have a question in part b of question 29 Egin group in BPP kit.
(1): Doye has 40% of Spade -> This relationship is associate -> NOT disclose the intra-group transactions between both of them. But the answer has written that the disclosure of the transaction. I think that it is not correct.
(2) Egin has 60% of Doye and Doye has 40% of Spade. I am confused that the answer: Egin and Spade is NOT related party ? and the reason for this is not clear. Furthermore, this question is the same case of Atomic & Eye. The answer for NOT related party is not clear.
(3) I assume that Doye has 60% of Spade rather than 40% of Spade, if Egin and Spade is the related party ? I think that it is the related party but I am NOT sure about this.
Hope to see your explanations. Thanks tutor !
Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR
IAS 24
4y ago#1(one question per post please)
In RPT questions it is fine to say that X and Y MAY be RP - it is a matter of professional judgement.
Remember that at this level we worry more about the substance of the relationship than any specific % - i.e. does control or influence exist in substance.
Under IAS you MUST disclose transactions with subs and ass - so disclosure would be required in the first scenario above.
All the examiner wants to see is that you know the definitions and can attempt to appy them.
Sign into reply to this topic.