• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Exclusion clause v Unfair terms Legislation

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Exclusion clause v Unfair terms Legislation

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 11, 2022 at 12:49 am #668268
    shopnipung@gmail.com
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Thank you for the lectures on Contract Law

    Would Securicor have been liable if there was a loss of life or injury to a member of Photofilm company staff? If yes, wouldn’t that be contradicting as a company is either liable for the loss or not – the liability shouldn’t depend on the type of loss, should it?

    Many thanks

    October 11, 2022 at 6:59 am #668277
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Well, clearly, the applicability of the exemption clause MUST depend upon the nature of the ‘loss or damage’

    Under the Unfair Contract Terms Act it is not available to defend / protect yourself from liability for actions resulting in personal injury or death

    I believe that here is a situation where the statute law supersedes / overrides the common law

    OK?

    October 12, 2022 at 11:30 pm #668484
    shopnipung@gmail.com
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    ah okay – so if I got this right, any loss of life would have dropped Secuircor case in the territory of the statute law (the unfair contract terms act)…even if they had an exclusion clause saying not responsible for any loss of life or property, the law would have superseded the contract term? right?

    October 13, 2022 at 6:50 pm #668552
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    That’s certainly the way that I’ve understood the law to work

    OK?

    October 15, 2022 at 3:06 am #668661
    shopnipung@gmail.com
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    thank you 🙂

    October 15, 2022 at 9:06 am #668669
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re very welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 4 Questions Environmental Management Accounting
  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in