Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AAA Advanced Audit and Assurance Forums › *** December 2025 ACCA AAA exam – Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 15 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by
shizu.
- AuthorPosts
- December 1, 2025 at 1:28 pm #723685December 1, 2025 at 6:03 pm #723699
Such a wierd exam, don’t even know how it went for me 😀
December 1, 2025 at 6:08 pm #723700Even for the materiality i got around $26.9m but only got to use it for a few of the romms. Not alot of numbers also ask weird question 3 about the car industry just guessed my way through that question
December 1, 2025 at 6:08 pm #723701Even for the materiality i got around $26.9m but only got to use it for a few of the romms. Not alot of numbers also ask weird question 3 about the car industry just guessed my way through that question
December 1, 2025 at 6:45 pm #723704I got the same as you @eman1111. I also found it hard to apply this to the ROMMS :/ and even found that challenging 🙁
December 2, 2025 at 12:52 am #723709Did you remember is that first question was listed or non listed client ?
December 2, 2025 at 1:50 am #723710@rakibb all of my question mentioned non-listed client. My paper had Bright Co, question related to Balhalm Travels, and adjustment related question.
On god, risk of material misstatements was hard to find out. What did you guys write for the audit opinion, should it be adverse or qualified?
December 2, 2025 at 3:23 am #723711Indeed such a weird exam
December 2, 2025 at 6:51 am #723720we had to give an opinion???
December 2, 2025 at 10:21 am #723725I think so that all questions were non listed clients.
I couldn’t answer the report section due to time constraint. Our centre had technical issues. Exam started at 5.00 instead of 1.30 and also connection was lost during the exam so actually it impacted the writingDecember 2, 2025 at 12:05 pm #723728@stuthi there’s a chance that you might’ve got a different set
December 2, 2025 at 4:47 pm #723733In bright co, I think we have to give qualified as other 2 misstatement are corrected
December 2, 2025 at 6:33 pm #723738God I really hope so, it would be so stupid of me if I didn’t read the question right
December 6, 2025 at 5:23 pm #723877It was very hard exam!!
Only able to use materiality for revenue and IA and minimum 4-5 ROMM needed, not sure what else can be linked to ROMM from the question.
December 13, 2025 at 2:35 am #723942Section B had question about comment or criticism the audit opinion. Like language is not okay , relevant standard nimber abd name not mentioned and such to write. Then thre was sastainabilitu assistance question in A.
This is my forth time after 44 , 38 then 45. So hopefully I hear good result on 16th January.December 13, 2025 at 2:38 am #723943Indeed. The wording of question was not the same as usual way of asking and it was tricky wording. I hope I read the question triple times and answered it as it should be. But in panic not always easy to remeber read your question carefully.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
