Skip to content

ACCA Forums

FM*** December 2023 ACCA FM exam – Instant Poll and comments ***

Oopentuition_teamAdmin2y ago
How was your December 2023 ACCA FM exam? Vote in the Instant Poll
December 2023 ACCA FM exam — historical results
(Comments will be opened after 5PM UK)
KKatie2y ago#1
That was awful. Section c not too bad but still think I messed them up NPV was one of my 12 mark questions which was nice. The section A and B were horrific didn’t know any of them
JCJamile Conti2y ago#2
I had the NPV section C as well. Got confused if development costs should be included . Was your NPV - or +?
JCJamile Conti2y ago#3
Had the same issue for section A & B , too many theory questions with multiple answers per question :(
KKatie2y ago#4
I was told if they have ready been spent then it is sunk costs and not to include them. Even the 1m absorbed costs in fixed costs shouldn’t have been included. I got a + NPV don’t know if it’s right though. I’m so annoyed studied so so much took all week off work to study and nothing really came up relevant to what I have been studying. Nothing on Islamic finance when I learnt all of the different terms
VValentina2y ago#5
I understood that they have been already incurred them, so they should not benn included in NPV… But I also lost in this question.. If the net CF is negative for the first year what tax payable should be? I indicated zero..
KKatie2y ago#6
Yes I messed that bit up I hadn’t come across a question like that before
VValentina2y ago#7
Totally agree. And even smth that I learned and practiced (again NPV) I completely forgot some things related to tax and working capital… Like just blank peace of paper into the head
AAlii2y ago#8
What was it with all the market hedging questions??? Defo no what I was expecting
VValentina2y ago#9
Mine second section C question was to calculate gearing, interest cover and EPS. But they told “for both favourable and unfavourable cases”. But here were also 2 ways of investment, so I calculated for 4 cases ?? Rights issue Unf, Rights issue F. Loan notes unf, and loan notes F ?? hope at lease smth is correct ? But I messed up with gearing because in last minute decided to change RE and in addition some formulas I used moved… Oh, it is too emotional to take this ACCA
RRobert2y ago#10
Section A was good and section C too - AgeAid which was a NFP with a lease or buy decision and then a WACC for the other Sect C Q. Lots of commentary / discussion marks available - CAPM & DVM, 3Es and VFM, why a lease v buying, and link between cost of finance and creditor hierarchy. However - section B was brutal!!!! FX question & Working capital were horrible but the business valuation was ok. So overall I voted ok and am hopeful for a first time pass.
TTom2y ago#11
I had the same section C, Did you get that AgeAid purchase PV was cheaper? I did but the the next question seemed to imply lease was cheaper The exam was okay I didn't feel completely lost at any point
EEs2y ago#12
Phew that was full on. So many choice questions in A where I just had to hedge my bets. Section B I had a right panic on. Section C the NPV I think I did well but not sure if tax was starting in period 1 or 2? I think the first year loss got a tax rebate as indicated to do that in the question. My second C question was accounts receivable offer discount or factor. I had net costs for both with the discount cost huge so feel I might have been off on it by quite some way. Barely any WACC or Capm etc, so odd to learn so so much stuff that doesn’t crop up then 8 marks on difference between real and money rate - I can’t think of how you can say enough to get to that level of marks - bananas! Enjoying reading comments everyone
AApeksha2y ago#13
Yeah even i got that question. I literally did the whole bpp and kaplan but never came across a sum like this.
AApeksha2y ago#14
I think the NPV development cost is suppose to be a sunk cost so it will become an irrelevant cost so we do not take that. Fixed cost should be 6m-1m=5m
HHillary2y ago#15
My 2nd qstn in section C was disaster. The first 12 marks required calculation of Gearing, interest cover EPS in 1 yr for both favorable and unfavorable where there was rights issue or loan note issue. I don't think I will get any mark on those 12 marks.
HHillary2y ago#16
Anyone with an idea on the section A sensitively analysis question. Sensitivity to savings options answer were for A around 20K, another around 13k, another around 2k and another around 4k Then there was loan note conversion in sec A again option A while said conversion premium was around $500 other options I don't remember.
JCJamile Conti2y ago#17
I adjusted fixed cost but considered the development cost :(
HHillary2y ago#18
That question was terrible for a last question in an exam. You have to think hard when the exam is almost time up. I don't think I will get any mark on those 12 marks.
HHillary2y ago#19
I did the same. Do we start adjusting for inflation in year 1?
JCJamile Conti2y ago#20
That is what I did year 1 would be for example x 1.04 , then 2nd year x1.04^2 and so on
JJosuke2y ago#21
Does anyone remember answer to the question that asked purchase power parity for 18 months loan payment in section B? I chose the first option.
RRobert2y ago#22
I had the lease as slightly cheaper and the next q implied this was correct … it said other than NPV cost
AAhmed2y ago#23
The question related to finding the foreign currency payment in dollar using the purchasing power parity theory what the hell was this? I really wanted to understand what is this concept
AAhmed2y ago#24
Who solved the Early settlement discount and the factoring question in Section C? Did it end up choosing the benefit of factoring as it was a net benefit and the other option ( early settlement resulted in net cost ) so the option was to factor?
JJunaid2y ago#25
I had the same exact, I had a WACC and lease and buy, I remember something with shares in the wacc where I just froze and couldn’t figure it out and used the nominal loan note as redemption. I got a wacc of 13% not sure if this is right. What did you get? With my lease and buy I had buy at 635k and lease at 353k both negative but feel like I went wrong somewhere. So annoyed!
JJunaid2y ago#26
I had the same exact, I had a WACC and lease and buy, I remember something with shares in the wacc where I just froze and couldn’t figure it out and used the nominal loan note as redemption. I got a wacc of 13% not sure if this is right. What did you get? With my lease and buy I had buy at 635k and lease at 353k both negative but feel like I went wrong somewhere. So annoyed!
TTom2y ago#27
From memory I had the same or very similar lease for AgeAid but my purchase cost was something around 5k less than the lease cost. (Outlay + maintenance + other costs - gain on disposal) In the end, as is the case with me, section c part 2 is always rushed. Which was the WACC I managed to get a WACC answer off but sure it's not right. Was one of the preference shares or loan notes where convertible? I didn't have time to look into this and focused with having al least a resemblance of a full calculation. I am assuming that if there was convertible debt/loan notes that it would lower the cost of debt and the WACC
NNichola2y ago#28
But should the development costs have been amortized? I think that they should have been but there was no indication of how so I added them to the reducing balance TAD. I also added a tax rebate T1 but perhaps that should have been added to T2?
NNichola2y ago#29
I got the same, very fiddly with the trade receivable movement. I got option 1 discount at 202000 loss and factoring at 17k benefit
NNichola2y ago#30
I remember that I flagged it but can’t remember outcome I ran fishers formula twice once at 12 moths and once at 6mths
Topic lockedNew replies are closed.