case study on CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO. LTD

Can you make an offer to the world at large? That was the question Not before Carlill case but Courts said 'Yes' in a 'reward' situation Other defences claimed by Carbolic included: - no consideration moving from Carlill - no notification of acceptance by Carlill - no intention by Carbolic to create legal relations - time period for claimants Better?

so this is the objective n the goal n the whole problem ?

To determine whether it is possible to make an offer to the world at large? Yes, that was the core of the dispute OK?

How about this DONOGHUE v STEVENSON (1932) case? I just want to comprehend about this 2 case,because it is important, the question also same as above only different case, TQ

Is it possible to take action against a party not directly involved in a transaction? Where that party is a manufacturer, that party owes a duty of care to those people who will be using / consuming those goods made by the manufacturer Is that better?

yes,tqvm

Yvw!