• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

BPP mock Exam Sec C question on DIY

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › BPP mock Exam Sec C question on DIY

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 16, 2018 at 10:37 am #468078
    poonamvimal
    Participant
    • Topics: 32
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆☆

    Hi John,
    The question was to calculate operational lab efficiency and following data was given:
    DIY uses skilled staff to operate that converts raw maerial into finished product. the standard direct labour hours for each 100 liters of white paint is 8 direct labour hours @$24 per hour.
    During Feb 640 direct hours were worked at a cost of $16500. it is now realised that a new wage rate of $26 per hour had been agreed with the workers. A total of 7800 liters of paint was produced in feb.
    ii) calculate operational labour efficiency variance.
    I got adverse $384 as the answer. Its given 3840 as favorable. Can you pls clarify this. Many thanks!!

    August 16, 2018 at 12:15 pm #468090
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Are you sure that you have copied the question correctly?

    If you have then there is a typing error in either the question or the answer in your book (if it is in the BPP Revision Kit, or in a past exam, then tell me the number of the question and I will check).

    The correct answer is $384 adverse.

    For the 7,800 litres produced, they should have taken 7800/100 x 8 = 624 hours.

    They actually took 640 hours, which is 16 hours too much. 16 hours x $24 per hour = $384.

    August 16, 2018 at 12:51 pm #468107
    poonamvimal
    Participant
    • Topics: 32
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆☆

    it is from the CBE mock exam paper. I did check it myself so many times that i m sure the number written there is 3840.

    August 16, 2018 at 1:00 pm #468109
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I think we must be using different versions of the BPP Revision Kit, because this question does not appear in the mock exam in my book. (Mine is for exams to June 2018 – I am waiting for them to deliver the current version to me).

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Govere on The use of ratios and comparisons in auditing
  • John Moffat on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in