• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Accounting for inventory

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Accounting for inventory

  • This topic has 11 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 21, 2015 at 11:27 am #233538
    hanadi
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    The reorder level is it the same as reorder quantity ?..I am using bpp book . In some examples it refers to the reorder quantity as the same as reorder level in other examples it mentioned that the reorder quantity is the EOQ which is different than reorder level ,I am confused .

    March 21, 2015 at 4:26 pm #233573
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No – they are not the same.

    The reorder quantity is the number of units that you order each time that you place an order.

    The reorder level is the number of units still in inventory at the time you place the order.

    For the exam it is the reorder quantity that is the most important.
    The relevance of the reorder level is that if there is going to be a delay between placing an order and actually receiving the units. then you need to order when you still have units left in inventory (otherwise you will run out before the new order arrives).

    In EOQ calculations we always ignore this problem – the reorder level is not relevant for EOQ calculations.

    March 21, 2015 at 6:15 pm #233586
    hanadi
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    Thank you so much

    March 21, 2015 at 9:54 pm #233611
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

    March 22, 2015 at 3:07 pm #233662
    hemraj123
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 188
    • ☆☆☆

    Why is spare parts classified as inventory? As far as I am aware, spare parts is used to increase the life of machinery and therefore should be treated as an asset.

    Thanks and awaiting your reply

    March 22, 2015 at 3:19 pm #233665
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Spare parts are treated like repairs – they are revenue expenditure and are not capitalised as assets.
    It is because fitting a replacement part is simply getting the machine back to its original state. We only capitalise if it is improving on what the machine originally was – like turning it into a bigger machine.

    March 22, 2015 at 4:06 pm #233674
    hemraj123
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 188
    • ☆☆☆

    Then why is spare parts classified as inventory?

    March 22, 2015 at 9:52 pm #233697
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    They are inventory until they are used – just as purchases are held as inventory until used.

    March 23, 2015 at 11:53 am #233772
    Ibrahim
    Member
    • Topics: 41
    • Replies: 79
    • ☆☆

    hi john, on 19 March, 2015, I passed F2 with 82%. thank you. u have been helpful.

    March 23, 2015 at 1:12 pm #238497
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    That is great – many congratulations 🙂

    March 23, 2015 at 4:48 pm #238513
    hemraj123
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 188
    • ☆☆☆

    So if anything which is held is inventory, can different machine components which are used to produce different variations of the product be inventory?

    March 23, 2015 at 6:07 pm #238515
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If they were bought at the same time as the machine, then I think that would be fair enough. If they were bought later, then there would still be a good argument for capitalising them.

    (Although there is no way this would be mentioned in Paper F3 🙂 )

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in