- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
- Topics: 16
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Part c why the Macaulay calculation divide 60,000,000 not the pv of annual payment there is a diff of 15755 but the final answer are the same 2.47
Second question why2.47/1.02 the normal Macaulay calculation don’t do that
I have recorded a lecture working through the whole of this question.
You can find it linked from this page:
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘2014june q1 cmc’ is closed to new replies.