[Yulya]

🙁 Thanks… )))) then in case I correctly indicated that the matter is material but not pervasive but incorrectly pointed the nature of the matter than I lost 1 mark?

[Yulya]

hi! Conserning question 5 (Exposion) – I had written that the matter was material (as it higher than upper limit of acceptable level of revenue and PBT) but NOT pervasive. As far as I understand many people wrote the same.
But why you think it is NOT required amendment???? As a result of explosion inventories which WERE in stocktake as at the year end had been damaged!!! Or I understand incorrectle??? Such inventories did not exist as at the year end???? waiting your answers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Author]

Posts