Traditional capital structure theory
Under the traditional view, replacing some equity with lower-cost debt can initially reduce the weighted average cost of capital. Beyond a point, rising financial risk causes equity and eventually debt providers to require higher returns, producing a minimum-WACC capital structure. This is a conceptual account rather than a universal numerical rule. The optimum depends on assumptions and business conditions and cannot be found by simply maximising debt. Compare it with Modigliani–Miller propositions and real-world taxes, distress costs, agency issues and financing flexibility.
Worked example
A firm estimates WACC of 11% with no debt, 9% at moderate gearing and 12% at very high gearing because required returns rise sharply. The middle structure is preferred within those modelled assumptions, rather than the highest debt proportion.
Common mistake
Assuming debt remains equally cheap at every gearing level and therefore WACC must always decline as borrowing increases.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Supporting | September 2026–June 2027 |
| ACCA | FM | Direct | September 2026–June 2027 |
