Skip to contentSkip to search

Risk–return trade-off

Investors usually require a higher expected return for bearing additional relevant risk, but higher risk does not guarantee a higher realised return. The comparison must specify the risk measure, time horizon and available alternatives. Diversification can reduce some company-specific risk; in CAPM, the expected premium is linked to systematic risk rather than total volatility. Businesses also compare risk, return, liquidity and strategic consequences when selecting financing or investments. A high historical return alone does not establish that an investment is suitable or adequately compensates for risk.

Worked example

An investor can choose a secure $100 repayment or a risky investment expected to return $110. The extra $10 expected return is compensation for accepting uncertainty, but the risky investment may actually return less than $100.

Common mistake

Saying a riskier investment must deliver a higher actual return, or comparing returns without considering the risks and time horizons involved.

Where it appears in your exams

QualificationExamRelationshipPeriod
ACCA AFM Supporting September 2026–June 2027
ACCA FM Direct September 2026–June 2027