Risk–return trade-off
Investors usually require a higher expected return for bearing additional relevant risk, but higher risk does not guarantee a higher realised return. The comparison must specify the risk measure, time horizon and available alternatives. Diversification can reduce some company-specific risk; in CAPM, the expected premium is linked to systematic risk rather than total volatility. Businesses also compare risk, return, liquidity and strategic consequences when selecting financing or investments. A high historical return alone does not establish that an investment is suitable or adequately compensates for risk.
Worked example
An investor can choose a secure $100 repayment or a risky investment expected to return $110. The extra $10 expected return is compensation for accepting uncertainty, but the risky investment may actually return less than $100.
Common mistake
Saying a riskier investment must deliver a higher actual return, or comparing returns without considering the risks and time horizons involved.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Supporting | September 2026–June 2027 |
| ACCA | FM | Direct | September 2026–June 2027 |
