Random-walk model of prices
A simple model writes the next price as the current price plus a drift term and a new random innovation. Independence or lack of predictability concerns the innovations or changes, not the successive price levels. A positive drift can make expected changes positive without making the next actual movement predictable. Equal probabilities of an increase and decrease are not required by every random-walk specification. Distinguish this statistical model from the broader weak-form efficiency proposition about abnormal returns after risk and costs; one is not an automatic empirical proof of the other.
Worked example
A model starts at 100 and adds drift 0.2 plus an unpredictable innovation each day. Tomorrow’s expected price is 100.2, but the realised price can fall; today’s 100 remains part of tomorrow’s level.
Common mistake
Saying successive price levels are independent, or that every random walk must have a 50%chance of each direction.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Supporting | September 2026–June 2027 |
