Pecking order theory
The financing hierarchy is commonly explained by information asymmetry, transaction costs and the signals investors infer from new issues. Managers may know more about the business than outside investors, making external equity particularly sensitive to perceived misvaluation. The theory describes tendencies rather than a mandatory rule and does not necessarily imply a fixed target gearing ratio. Profitable firms may use less debt because they generate internal funds, while funding needs can increase borrowing. Practical constraints and strategic objectives can override the hierarchy in a particular case.
Worked example
A business funds a modest expansion from retained cash, then uses borrowing for additional needs, and considers a new equity issue only when those sources are inadequate or unsuitable. This sequence illustrates the theory; it does not prove it is always the best decision.
Common mistake
Presenting the hierarchy as a legal requirement or claiming internally generated finance has no opportunity cost.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Direct | September 2026–June 2027 |
| ACCA | FM | Direct | September 2026–June 2027 |
