Pac-Man defence
The target attempts to reverse the direction of the contest by making or preparing a counter-acquisition proposal. The idea differs from finding a friendly third-party buyer or issuing defensive securities. Its credibility depends on financing, relative size, regulatory feasibility, shareholder support and the ability to manage the resulting business. It can change negotiating incentives but may create substantial leverage, distraction and transaction costs. Evaluate the proposed acquisition on its own commercial merits and within applicable takeover rules rather than assume that aggression alone defeats the original bid.
Worked example
After A bids for B, B considers a counterbid for A. B must establish a feasible funding plan and value case; merely announcing that it dislikes A’s offer does not create a credible counterbid.
Common mistake
Confusing a counterbid for the bidder with seeking a white knight, or assuming the tactic guarantees withdrawal of the original offer.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Supporting | September 2026–June 2027 |
