Option to abandon
Abandonment limits some downside by allowing management to compare the value of continuing with the net proceeds or value from stopping. It can resemble a put option, with the recoverable abandonment value playing a role similar to an exercise price. Consider closure costs, contractual penalties, staff and environmental obligations and whether assets can actually be sold. A fixed-course NPV may omit this flexibility, but adding option value again is wrong if the forecast already assumes optimally timed abandonment. The recoverable value itself may be uncertain.
Worked example
A project could be continued with remaining value $700,000 or closed with equipment-sale proceeds of $900,000 less $100,000 closure costs. Net abandonment value is $800,000, so stopping is financially preferable under those assumptions.
Common mistake
Using gross resale proceeds as abandonment value while ignoring closure costs and continuing obligations.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Direct | September 2026–June 2027 |
