Intercompany management charge
A parent or service company may charge for genuine functions such as administration, systems or coordination. Identify the services, beneficiary, allocation basis, agreement and evidence rather than treating any remittance as a management charge. Cross-border charges can have transfer-pricing, deductibility, withholding, currency and remittance consequences under the applicable rules. The charge is separate from the CEO’s salary and from a dividend. Internal income and expense normally eliminate in group analysis, while genuine tax, cash-timing and external costs may remain relevant; an accounting label does not override legal transfer restrictions.
Worked example
A shared-services company allocates a documented systems-support cost to subsidiaries using an appropriate basis. Group cash-flow appraisal eliminates the internal fee while separately evaluating any genuine external tax or timing consequences.
Common mistake
Calling executive remuneration an intercompany service charge or assuming an invented fee can lawfully bypass blocked-fund restrictions.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Supporting | September 2026–June 2027 |
