Infant-industry protection argument
The argument requires more than observing that an industry is new. Assess the claimed learning benefits, financing or coordination problem, likely future competitiveness and the costs imposed on consumers, taxpayers and other producers. Support can create dependence, lobbying and inefficient resource use if it lacks credible conditions and an exit. The economic argument is separate from whether a particular subsidy, tariff or quota is lawful under current commitments. It does not prove every start-up should receive protection or that all protected firms will eventually compete successfully.
Worked example
A proposal supports a new component industry during a defined learning phase. The appraisal tests achievable unit-cost reductions and an exit condition rather than assume protection should continue whenever firms report losses.
Common mistake
Calling every new industry deserving of indefinite protection or equating an economic argument with legal permission for a subsidy.
Where it appears in your exams
| Qualification | Exam | Relationship | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCA | AFM | Supporting | September 2026–June 2027 |
