Skip to contentSkip to search

Asset replacement decision

Replacement analysis compares feasible options such as continued use, repair or replacement. Include relevant acquisition, operating, disposal and tax cash flows with consistent timing; historical purchase cost is sunk except for effects on future tax or disposal consequences. Equivalent annual cost can compare repeatable cycles delivering equivalent service, but it is not the definition of every replacement decision. Unequal benefits, changing technology, financing constraints and a finite service requirement may need a broader NPV comparison. Specify the assumptions before treating the lowest annualised cost as optimal.

Worked example

Continuing an old machine avoids a$40,000 purchase but causes higher maintenance and slower output. The decision compares future incremental cash flows and service consequences; the old machine’s original$60,000 purchase price is not a new cash outflow.

Common mistake

Equating every replacement decision with one EAC formula or comparing unequal service solely by purchase price.

Where it appears in your exams

QualificationExamRelationshipPeriod
ACCA FM Supporting September 2026–June 2027