in eg4 the parent would cease to have control of the sub, so it would be treated as an associate. This mean they would also cease to prepare consolidated financial statements . So how would the group profit on disposal be shown. would it be shown in the parent’s individual financials?
Hi if you please can explain in the first example ( from 90 to 70) the reason that why we didnt reduce the goodwill since we added it to the 350? i mean when we added it to the 350 then that suggests the goodwill would be decreased. thanks
Isn’t the Full Goodwill method that makes the GW’s figure not change? As the Goodwill is equal to P%+NCI%. Thus if it is only the change in % between P% and NCI%(still control), then suppose the Goodwill wont change. And the reason why add NA and Goodwill is to find out the value of (P+NCI )@ the date of disposal.
in eg4 the parent would cease to have control of the sub, so it would be treated as an associate. This mean they would also cease to prepare consolidated financial statements .
So how would the group profit on disposal be shown. would it be shown in the parent’s individual financials?
Hi
if you please can explain in the first example ( from 90 to 70) the reason that why we didnt reduce the goodwill since we added it to the 350?
i mean when we added it to the 350 then that suggests the goodwill would be decreased.
thanks
Isn’t the Full Goodwill method that makes the GW’s figure not change? As the Goodwill is equal to P%+NCI%. Thus if it is only the change in % between P% and NCI%(still control), then suppose the Goodwill wont change.
And the reason why add NA and Goodwill is to find out the value of (P+NCI )@ the date of disposal.