Common Law part 2
Reader Interactions
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition
Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams
March 2026 ACCA Exams Results
Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
what can be done is to attend the general meeting
Hi Mike
Could please explain to me in Common Law where it mentioned ‘ Will not be awarded if the contract has been affirmed’. On your lecture you said that if purchased a shares and discovered later that details were incorrect on the prospectus and what you can be done is to attend general as this confirms that you are a shareholder.
My understanding is you won’t get awarded – a remedy if you confirmed the contract by attending the meeting? Is that correct?
The sound on Liuidity damages goes off, can you please explain it in brief ?
It’s the level of damages agreed when signing the contract to be paid in the event of something going wrong
Ok?
thanks Sir,your lectures are a great help
Chapter 3 Statute Law Lectures are very useful. But they stop at the Rules of interpretation. Are there further lectures on the remaining course notes?
There’s five days’ lectures on the site. Of necessity I couldn’t cover every chapter of the notes but they are substantially all covered
If you have any problems with your law, post on the “Ask the Tutor” page for F4
Ok?
Many thanks. It just helps to hear the lecture rather than having to purely read text books.
When he says bottom of page 35, which document is he referring to? I can’t find it in the F4 course notes for Global variant. Thx
ok, found it in English version. Will these lectures help me if I’m taking the global version?
I’m still a bit confused. A lot of the words being used I cannot find on these pages and what are all of these examples of trees?
Chloe, the videos are recordings from a course for F4 English variant. The recordings are relevant for Global variant from partnership law onwards
Sir, I think the Limitations Act contradicts the Doctrine of Laches because 6 yrs or longer is quite an unreasonably long time for something like, say the wrong purchase of a certain kind of fruit tree, don’t you think? What separates them?
The fruit tree was in fact 7 years! It was not possible to tell whether the fruit tree was a Purple Pershore Plum tree because it didn’t bear fruit until the 7th year and, when it did, they weren’t Purple Pershore Plums.
I’m not really sure whether I care to agree with you or disagree! It’s what the law says! Now, if you wish to change the law (built up over the last 947 years) then good luck to you!
馃檪
No no I didn’t mean to disagree with the law, its just that if such a law exists, under what circumstances would the Doctrine of Laches be valid?
I haven’t practiced this area from the revision kit yet may be that answers the question..
I think Laches and 6 years are the same thing – any delay longer than 6 years defeats equities!
Do we need to know the cases name in the exam or the whole scenario?
NEITHER! Read the F4 exam technique article on this site!
only the cases names .
NO!! You’re wrong fatemaalfahdi! Hussain (and you fatemaalfahdi) read the exam technique article for F4 on this site
now here goes a great lecture and a great lecturer