OpenTuition.com Free resources for accountancy students
Free ACCA lectures and course notes | ACCA AAT FIA resources and forums | ACCA Global Community
ACCA F7 lectures Download F7 notes
August 27, 2015 at 2:00 am
I was just wondering why you used 7 years when calculating the TNCA instead of 9 years. where did you get the 7 years from please?
August 27, 2015 at 2:13 am
please ignore my question above, I have gone back to the question and i think i get it…
but correct me if i am wrong…
its 14 instalments paid twice in a year, hence within 7 years the 14 instalments are fully paid up making the lease term 7 years right?
August 27, 2015 at 8:57 am
August 18, 2015 at 11:59 pm
Mike, many thanks once again for your clear explanation.
May 4, 2015 at 3:27 pm
Sir in reconciliation of PV ( Giedrius)
5. £3000 (gross). Net £1712 but I divide £3000 by 1.10 by 6 times it gives me £1693 again different . That’s what you told us in example 1. Please advise
May 4, 2015 at 8:55 pm
Just one question before I agree with you – just confirm that the cost of capital is 10%
If it is, then I must agree with you, I also have just calculated it to be 1,693
I probably did it by mental arithmetic the first time (but I’ve just done it again in my head, so that’s no excuse)
May 4, 2015 at 10:11 pm
Thanks for prompt response. Sir can you please advise any trick to convert gross amount into net. As we can’t calculate all interest & instalment payment till end nil balance . As we just have to calculate till year end of year 2.
May 4, 2015 at 10:12 pm
Yes it’s 10% interest rate.
May 5, 2015 at 6:46 am
You will NOT EVER be required to calculate the interest for more than “this year and the next”
I need to think again about the 1,712 / 1,693 issue – I suppose it could just be rounding but that’s unusual – I try not to be guilty of rounding too much
November 26, 2014 at 2:39 pm
the Lease interest calculation changes depending on the rental payment done in advance and rental payment done in arrears. How this will effect the interest calculation table?
November 26, 2014 at 3:31 pm
It doesn’t change the basic principles at all. What you should always have clearly in your mind is the dates the payments are made and how much capital has been outstanding for how many months
Otherwise, it’s just the same! Capital brought forward since last installment paid, add on the interest accrued on that capital (pay GREAT attention to the dates / periods) pay the next installment (beware, it may be paid “tomorrow” in the next accounting year) and that will give you a capital amount outstanding to which you will apply the same principles ie add interest, deduct payment, add interest, deduct payment, add inte……
August 31, 2014 at 6:16 am
please Sir I need help,im lost, why does the interest charge calculation start from year Jan 2004, not Jan 2009?
August 31, 2014 at 9:16 am
Sharly – it’s the same answer as in my last answer to your last question.
The recording was made using a previous version of the notes. The figures haven’t changed – just the year end. To bring the question more recent, I have added 5 years onto 2004 and arrived at 2009.
All the calculations are valid / correct – it’s just that I didn’t re-record the lecture
August 31, 2014 at 9:17 am
Sorry Sharly, I answered this one before I read your next two!
September 2, 2014 at 5:02 am
thank you sir! very clear now
September 2, 2014 at 6:00 am
August 30, 2014 at 6:33 am
on example 2 calculation for Giedrius why is it written deposit Jan 2004 $1152? I thought it is Jan 2009 as the question said that the deposit was 1 Jan 2009 $1152. why are we using the actuarial method in this example?
August 30, 2014 at 6:54 am
Where exactly does it say “deposit paid Jan 2004”?. The notes say 2009. The lecture may say 2004 but that’s because it was a recorded lecture from a previous (original) version.
You need, mentally, to move the years in the lecture forward by 5.
We are using the actuarial method because the rate of interest is given in the question
August 31, 2014 at 6:21 am
ok Sir I clearly understand now … thank you Sir, no need to reply my second question again.
August 31, 2014 at 6:26 am
so it means that interest in year jan 2005 will now be jan 2010, ok thank a lot.
April 25, 2014 at 6:56 am
Hi all..does anyone know how the net figures came out of reconciliation of obligations under finance leases ..the gross is understood ..how was 2790,8793,1712 calculated…thank you for your help..Mike! Can you help?
August 30, 2014 at 11:38 am
Yes, but I wish that you had posted this on the Ask the Tutor page!
These figures represent the present day discounted value of the future instalments
So, $3,000 discounted at the rate of 10% for 1 year is $2,790 (it’s actually $2,727)
$3,000 discounted for 5 years at the rate of 10% gives us $1,712 (actually it’s $1,863 – that could also be incorrect – I’ve just arrived at the figure through mental arithmetic – I don’t have a calculator to hand)
I trust that that would have been helpful back in June!
September 7, 2014 at 1:48 pm
Excuse me Mike, does it mean, that figures 2790 and 1712 in course notes are incorrect? Because if we simply calculate 3000 by dividing on 1.1 or (1.1)^6 – the figures are different
September 7, 2014 at 7:08 pm
Hi Pavel – yes – if my most recent post calculations are correct, then the figures in the course notes are rounded badly. The figures in my recent post were done to a degree of accuracy not necessary in the exams – normally the examiner will expect you only to work to 2 decimal places – and that’s also in the rare event that there is a lease calculation question in the exam – that, itself, is highly unlikely
April 23, 2014 at 4:02 pm
Guys, the way I understand it, is that the question is asking us for figures that will appear in financial statements at the y/e 31/12/2009. In other words they are asking us what will be treated as CL (payable within next 12 months time) and what will be treated as NCL (paid after 12 months from the y/e 31/12/2009). Therefore we need figures at y/e 31/12/2010 to figure out what will be payable within next 12 months from y/e 31/12/2009 (CL) and what will be paid afterwards (NCL).
Please correct me if I am wrong.
April 22, 2014 at 4:32 pm
helllo i am still a little unclear on the logic of how to calculate the current liabilites and non current liabilities…….can you please explain this
April 17, 2014 at 7:56 pm
I’m having trouble understanding the TNCA calculation. Can you please indicate what values are being used?
March 17, 2014 at 3:54 pm
I have got a question in reference to Reconciliation of Obligations under Finance Leases with the present value of the minimum lease payments
We know that from questions that the lease is for 7 years term. I cant get my head around why is it only 5 years is taken in to account. This is an extract from answers from lecture notes.
Why aren’t we saying that over 5 years are 2 x 3000, hence 6000. Why is it only 1 lease payment shown in payable more than 5 years.
Payable within 1 year 3,000
Payable more than 1 year, less than 5 years 12,000
Payable more than 5 years 3,000
I understand you are busy man but i will really appreciate Mike if you can please help.
March 17, 2014 at 10:39 pm
Sir, please ignore above. I was under the impression that this was from the reconciliation was from beginning of the time (start of lease) which is not the case. This will be dependent on the how many payment period has been lapsed.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
OpenTuition.com is dedicated to providing all accountancy students throughout the world with the resources they need to study for the major … Learn more
Please log in to get the most from OpenTuition, registration is free!