OpenTuition.com Free resources for accountancy students
Free ACCA lectures and course notes | ACCA AAT FIA resources and forums | ACCA Global Community
View ACCA F4 lectures Download F4 notes
September 17, 2016 at 6:29 pm
In Poussard v Spies and Pond case if the organiser was paying the same amount to the new singer (what he would have paid the old singer), can he still claim damages? After all he did go through the difficulty of finding a new one. Not to mention the tension he had to go through.
September 17, 2016 at 6:39 pm
In this case, the plaintiff was the artiste claiming that the contract was still valid. The case was lost.
There was never (so far as I am aware) any counter-claim brought by the organiser.
Now, if there had been such a claim, would the organiser have won?
What follows is pure speculation … yes, why not? The organiser has been put to additional trouble and, presumably, expense in trying to secure the services of the replacement performer so could (in my amateur opinion) reasonably claim recompense for those additional expenses
But that’s just my speculative opinion!
September 17, 2016 at 9:07 pm
Right, thanks 🙂
September 17, 2016 at 10:23 pm
March 17, 2015 at 6:34 am
Hello sir, I just want to say you’re absolutely brilliant in explanation..
I am not gonna go to take the classes anymore.
I actually feel that the class teacher had literally no idea what he was saying some times, i was absolutely lost.
by end of each class all students would be feeling like they’ve just go freed from prison, it was just awful and really boring.
This subject turned from REALLY BORING to REALLY INTERESTING after i started taking your lecturers.
THANK YOU SIR.
March 17, 2015 at 7:13 am
Thank you Imran for those kind words 🙂
Now please do me a favour? Spread the word about opentuition to your colleagues and fellow students. The more students that register and access the site, the better able we are to expand our service and help even more.
November 17, 2013 at 7:45 pm
does the lectures are enough to pass ?????
November 18, 2013 at 1:43 am
No you need to practice the past exam papers as well. Buy a revision kit and download the recent papers from the acca global website 🙂 Also if you have enough time, go through the technical articles on opentuition as well! 🙂
November 18, 2013 at 10:10 am
As Mario says, you MUST acquire a revision kit and start practising past exam questions
November 8, 2013 at 1:28 am
Sir. I tried to look up but couldn’t find any details related to the Express Newspapers v Silverstone case. Can you please give a summary of the events and what the court held at the end?
November 18, 2013 at 10:09 am
Newspaper advert on a bridge over the Silverstone racetrack.
This is what I found on Google!
In Express Newspapers Plc v. Silverstone Circuits the English Court of Appeal held that where safety considerations at a motor racing circuit required the demolition of a bridge, a contract permitting a newspaper the exclusive right to advertise its product on the bridge did not afford the newspaper a right to prevent removal of the bridge. In the view of the Court of Appeal the licence to advertise on that bridge was subject to an implied term that the licence would terminate if at any time it became necessary to remove or destroy the bridge, for whatever reason.
Did you try Google?
November 19, 2013 at 2:46 am
Yes I don’t know I was getting links of excerpts from the local newspaper that also goes by the name of Express Newspaper. Thanks a bunch!
September 10, 2013 at 8:45 pm
@ Mr Mike.
In the course notes i can see the small , fast and multi tracks systems dealing with claims 5,000 , 5000-15000 n > 15000 respectively.
However , in the June 2013 session there was 1 question on these. The ans was 5000, 5000 – 25000 , > 25000 .
why this change.?
Thanks in advance n OT is really good 🙂
November 18, 2013 at 10:03 am
Updated for inflation – but pass / fail in F4 is not going to be dependent upon knowing the monetary limits of the Courts’ authority.
February 22, 2013 at 6:11 pm
cant seem to distiguish between the ‘bettini’ and the ‘pusaud v space v pond case’ as it relates to conditions and warrantee. intresting way of teaching, by the way! double thumbs up!
February 23, 2013 at 1:25 am
Bettini – the breach didn’t go to the root of the contract – it wasn’t THAT important that part of the rehearsal period was missed.
Poussard v Spiers & Pond – the breach DID go to the root – not only was the rehearsal period missed but also the first 2 of the 4 concerts were to be missed as well
January 28, 2013 at 4:55 pm
fantasist teaching method.
October 25, 2012 at 4:44 pm
Bettini did not play 1974 world cup
October 25, 2012 at 5:03 pm
@avfcphill, Aw. ok, thanks for pointing out yet another material mistake in the lectures! :-))))
Did you notice that Bury won on Tuesday? First win this season 🙂
October 26, 2012 at 9:57 am
@MikeLittle, Just saying,
and noo i didnt congrats,
we are still looking poor at the minute.
you would probably beat us at the minute
August 9, 2012 at 1:13 pm
Nice and interesting tutorial, more grease to your elbow OT
June 2, 2012 at 12:00 pm
thanks for your free materials.
June 2, 2012 at 8:30 am
You’re lectures are great.
I always click an advert after each lecture as a thank you
April 3, 2012 at 12:40 am
thanks OT, the move videos I watch the more confident I get about the upcoming exams
April 3, 2012 at 12:41 am
February 29, 2012 at 12:11 am
Brilliant teaching method….
February 21, 2012 at 1:03 am
You must be logged in to post a comment.