| View all free ACCA Paper F4 (English variant) lectures >> | This F4 lecture is based on free OpenTuition course notes, view or download here >> |
ACCA F4 Chapter 4 Contract Law part 1
Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Login
Search this site
Technical Support
Are you having problems with downloading notes or watching lectures?
Please visit the support page: http://opentuition.com/support/
Recent Comments
- mahoysam on Inheritance Tax Lifetime Exemptions
- John Moffat on Planning and Operational variances
- John Moffat on Foreign Exchange Risk Management Currency futures lecture 2a
- fabiangrey on Planning and Operational variances
- mahoysam on Introduction to Inheritance Tax, Transfer of value, Death Estate
- findingsanity on ACCA F8 Revision Quiz
- tauraiversatile on Forecasting ACCA F5 Revision lecture
- sunnyaneel1 on Group Accounts: An Introduction
- Mahnoor on ACCA F1 Organisations
- selvakannanking2 on Pension Contributions continued; Annual Allowance (AA)
Testimonials
Recommend us
Advertise here
Copyright © 2013 · Privacy and Cookies · Advertising · Recommend this site · Contact us · Sitemap · Log in
Hi sir… your lectures are great.. thxxx… I think my problem with f4 is the way I answer the questions. If possible, can I send you an answer and have your opinion about it???? thxx
Sir, ur lectures are really helpful. thanks a lot.. I think my problem with theory papers is the way I respond to exam questions. Is it possible for to send u a question and have your opinion???? thxx
nice lecture ….
Dear Sir, could I use the 2008 Kaplan book as reference? Are there significant changes?
A 5 year old text book? – well, you could, but I personally would think that’s too big a risk. Can you not check your 2008 text with someone who has a 2012 or 2013 book and check the extent of the differences
My weakness is theory and being able to retain.. Is like when you reach part D you forget part B. Sir could or anyone could you recommend a way in making this fun and simpler especially when it comes to the cases. My hours are also limited due to my job. I just need to get pass F4 and I will be fine. Any help?
i would recommend listening to his lectures and getting the bpp I-Pass CDs the question bank helps you retain better. If unable to do so i think the flashcards and F4 revision test here also helps.
is it correct to refer to the name of case as alphabets eg. ,i may say X v Y instant of Fisher v Bell.
Great Work
Thank You so much Mr Mike for your wonderful tutoring.
Had always hate theory. You have made this subject interesting.
Could you please tell me if it is okay to use Kaplan 2011 text? I don’t have the 2012 update :/
And also is it possible to pass the exam this session if i give 4 hrs/day since I’ve chosen the papers for the december session (atlast – F4, F7) only today.
Best regards
@darkangel5, Hi
The 2011 Kaplan text is substantially ok but you need to download the articles on this site covering Treasury shares and the Bribery Act.
4 hours a day sounds to me like it could be enough, but don’t allow yourself to get bored or distracted. from that moment, your retention capabilities will be severely impaired. Break down your 4 hours into manageable parts.
And enjoy F4 – it’s fascinating!
@MikeLittle, Big Thanks!
You’re Awesome!
sir which study text will you recommend for f4 english law
BPP / GTG / KAPLAN / EMILEWOOLF
Because Bpp is not easily understandable because it has lot of details……………
Reply soooooooooon Please….
@acuteacca, I’m sorry but I’m not prepared to recommend any study text – different students have different preferences!
Sir i want to ask that can we write examples instead of cases in paper
and are cases necessary for paper or not as in notes there is case after every example????
Please Please reply soon….
@acuteacca, Examples are fine ( full case names are best, one case name is ok, “in a decided case” is ok, a “for example, if …” is acceptable )
@MikeLittle, Thank you so much sir
sir is last case of balls was succeed or not??????
@acuteacca, Yes, Mrs Carlill won – even though it was an advert – and therefore normally NOT an offer – the Court said that, in a reward situation, such an advert should be treated as an offer
@MikeLittle, Thank you so much sir God bless you for your kind information…..
sir are these lectures of contract law are complete
means are these covering complete topics
@acuteacca, Hi, there may be “bits” left off, but nothing major
@MikeLittle, Thank you so much
Excellent lecture!! Much Obliged!
good lecture
greatt lecturee (y)
thanks
for uploading this lecture
very good lecture, Mike you are the best Tutor!
I wasted so much time by struggling over the books, our lectures are very fast and not explained or interpreted in such detail. I love it, well done to all of you who contributed to this great helpful website!! I am now going definately pass. I finally understand all of it.
wondefull
Sir in the case of Partridge v Crittenden (1968) defendant mentioned the price of each bird so it should be an offer not a invitation to treat. i am confused about it. Describe it plz!
@umairhanif, It was an advert – therefore, it’s an invitation. That’s a principla which the judges appear very keen to preserve! The only time an advert will not be taken as an invitation is when it’s in a “reward” situation ( Williams v Carwardine, Carlill v Carbolic, R v Clark )
Sir if the poisons are mentioned with the price tags then it could be an offer or not in the Boots cash chemist case(1953)?
@umairhanif, it doesn’t matter whether or not there was an indicated price – goods in a shop or supermarket, priced or not priced, are invitations, NOT OFFERS
Some students are so ungrateful..it really stinks!!!!! Its free and helpful be thankful atleast!!!!
Thanks to all the lecturers for the support you have given to us.
Good lecture. It topic understandable for me.
Sir my teacher has said that carlill v carbolic smoke balls case that lady gets the money and u r saying she didnt get that why is that plz reply me sir i m so confused.
@Abrar khan, Listen to the part 2 chapter 4 video and find out what decision was made. The civil case was eventually made in favour of Mrs Carlill.
@Abrar khan, Are you sure that that is what I said? I cannot for one minute believe that I said the Carbolic Company won. NEVER have I EVER said that Carbolic won
Hello,
I’m having trouble viewing the lectures. Can someone please tell me how to view them.
Thanks
use google chrome
@admin, its not workin on my iphone but it says it works perfectly on apple safari ..Any idea?
You should know, iPhone does not support Flash, flash is a plugin for Safari, it exists for PCs but not iphones/ipads
@aamirnadeem, this lecture should now work on the iPhone,
Hi guys m feeling trouble in watching these lectures online . Can anybody plz let me know how cn i play these on ma ifone… ?
perfect!!
Good lecture i wish i knew about this a long time ago now was just told last week by a friend
Appreciate for provide the good lecture
very understandable
it ia amasing
great , and good approach to learn skillful accounting………..
great lecture
this guy’s funny
ha ha ha, funny case names. Boothvpharmaceutical comp. . poison case. . thank you for such a lovely lecture.
law bites
asd
this is great stuff