ACCA P7 lectures Download P7 notes
Chapter 14
Considering the work of internal auditors
Internal auditing is an independent appraisal function established within an organisation to examine and evaluate its activities as a service to the organisation. It is a control which functions by examining and evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of other controls.
The establishment of an internal audit function is seen as good corporate governance.
ACCA P7 Lecture Index
1 Rules of Professional Conduct
2 Professional Responsibility and Liability
3 Regulatory Environment
4 Practice Management
5 Audit Process
6 Evidence
7 Evaluation and Review
8 Audit of Financial Statements
9 Group Audits
10 The external audit report
11 Audit Related Services (Non Audit Services)
12 Assurance Services
13 Prospective Financial Information (PFI)
14 Internal Audit
15 Outsourced Finance and Accounting Functions
16 Social and Environmental Audits
Types of internal audit
The internal audit department could be involved in the following types of audit:
Compliance auditing
This would be concerned with the compliance of procedures with internal controls as laid down by management.
Efficiency auditing
This would be concerned with determining whether resources are being used efficiently. For example, the auditor would be interested in determining whether costs are being minimised.
Effectiveness auditing
This would be concerned with determining whether resources are being used to proper effect. For example, the auditor might consider whether it would be better for the entity to lease vans rather than purchase them outright.
Operational auditing
This encompasses both efficiency and effectiveness. The idea is that the auditor is concerned with the whole organisation and not just with finance and accounting.
Relationship with external auditors
The external auditor
The objective of the external auditor is to form an opinion on the truth and fairness of the financial statements. Reliance may be placed on the internal controls but this is seen as a short cut to examining all the transactions for the period.
The internal auditor
The prime objective of the internal auditor is to advise the management on whether its major operations have sound systems of internal controls. Therefore, they will test transactions to confirm the evaluation and determine the implications of any systems weaknesses. These systems are designed to ensure the future welfare of the entity rather than accounting for its activities.
Similarities
Both the external and the internal auditor carry out controls testing and both are concerned that the entity complies with its control procedures. However, the external auditor is more focused on financial systems and the financial statements.
Both operate as professionals and both produce formal reports on their activities.
Differences
The external auditor is not an employee of the entity. Internal auditors work for and on behalf of the entity.
Internal audit is not a legal requirement. It is a voluntary function which covers all the entity’s operations, not just the financial ones.
Internal auditors report to the board of directors or the audit committee. The external auditors report to the shareholders.
Example
Explain the reasons why internal auditors should, or should not, report their findings on internal control to the following selection of entity officials:
(a) the finance director
(b) the board of directors
(c) the audit committee
Outsourced internal audit services
Internal audit is not mandatory, so many entities have decided to outsource or contract out the function. This may result in the external audit firm providing both the external and the internal audit function.
The advantages of outsourcing internal audit include the following:
- some organisations are not large enough to warrant a separate internal audit department. Outsourcing is therefore the only means by which they can benefit from the function.
- the independence of the function is enhanced.
- the investigation of sensitive areas such as management fraud are easier if outsourcing is used.
- external providers may have more access to specialist knowledge.
However, there may be disadvantages as well:
- outsourcing internal audit appears to go against the spirit of corporate governance which regards regular monitoring of key controls by internal audit as an integral part of the entity’s system of controls.
- using external providers may be more expensive because they are paid fees which include a profit element.
- external staff may change frequently and the new staff will have to become acquainted with the system. Internal staff usually know the system better and can therefore identify problems more easily. They are also closer to the daily activities of the entity and may get earlier indications of developments or problems.
ikamarakay says
Thanks for the free lecture notes and vedios. But I cant download the vedios to be watched when off line ,because of the format in which they were uploaded .Greatful if they could be converted to a dowloaded format.
Once more thanks.
wajeehaj says
Thanks, it is really helpfull.
JLM says
Dear Teacher Mike,
Thanks for the rich insightful teachings.
There’s this past qn: Can Internal Audit svcs be undertaken for an Audit client? Explain the threat to objectivity.
I saw 1 part of the answer: ” Consideration should also be given to whether such non-assurance services should be provided ONLY by personnel NOT involved in the audit,
& with Different reporting lines within the firm.”
My question is this….: Even if an audit firm periodically rotates the staff who are sent out & stationed at the client”s place to do I.A, at the end of the day, those staff when they return & Report to the audit firm’s Partner(s) — I mean, it’s the Top guys (the Partners) who make final decisions.. isn’t it..?
If the Top guys who have the final say in the both the”Audit money-generating” side & also the “Internal Audit” side of that same client,…
Would this audit firm’s Partner(s) ever step itself in the foot, to let its Ext Auditors criticise its own I.A’s work?
Or can’t there exist a potential possibility of collusion between the Partner(s) & the Management, since the partner(s) involved on this client”advised & helped to design the internal Controls” & could do so to help intricately cover the tracks of any ‘dark activities’?
Then later when the partner(s) send in their Ext Auditors to conduct tests which avoid sensitive areas — according to the Partner(s)’ plan of the audit process, therefore the E.A can’t find anything?
And the threats I highlighted above, is it more possible to happen in a smaller audit firm which has maybe just 2 to 4 Partner(s) — and thus if any or all of them practise collusion with client’s mgmt, neither parties would report themselves to authorities? Or are the threats possible also, in the big 8 & big 4…?
Thks for your time,
L
teeye says
Thanks for this. It is a very interestingly lecture.
waqargoodguy says
yes wrong video… 🙁
opentuition_team says
it should be Ok now
thanks for spotting it
georgeeaston says
this is a replication of the evidence lecture, has the wrong video been uploaded?