ACCA P5 Question 4 June 2013

Comments

1. nsrohaizat says

   February 8, 2025 at 1:18 pm

   Hi, I’m confused why we need to calculate the housing components (like including the 575k adverse variance and a markup), when question (a) only asks us to evaluate current policy (pros and cons without giving suggestions I believe?)

   Log in to Reply

2. sharlene17 says

   June 2, 2019 at 2:48 pm

   Thanks Ken for a job well donein the explanation of the Landual Lamp question.
   I feel a bit more confident going into the exam on June 5 should Transfer pricing decide to feature in APM.

   Log in to Reply

3. Jeet says

   May 28, 2018 at 7:36 am

   You’re the best, Gromit. Thank you.

   Log in to Reply

   • Ken Garrett says

     May 28, 2018 at 7:51 am

     Thanks

     Log in to Reply

4. alina0712 says

   June 3, 2016 at 12:06 pm

   I’m a bit confused by what means of an adverse variance of 575000 related to the cost of sales. In my option, an adverse variance of cost of sales should be an actual increase of 575000 in cost of sales, that is a problem we would called, and also called a problem as stated in the scenario. Therefore, we should add the figure of 575000 to the budgeted figure of cost of sales (6902+1302). Is my understanding right? Thanks.

   Log in to Reply

5. z says

   August 4, 2015 at 8:08 pm

   for (c), profit of Housing, Electrical, Assembly are (8617), 335, 2719 respectively, but the total of those three is not 2641, which is he Landual’s group profit. Why is that?

   Log in to Reply

   • iuliandobra says

     February 29, 2016 at 4:11 pm

     The profit for Housing is (413). The total is now 2641

     Log in to Reply