• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
    • BT
    • MA
    • FA
    • LW
    • PM
    • TX-UK
    • FR
    • AA
    • FM
    • SBL
    • SBR
    • AAA
    • AFM
    • APM
    • ATX
    • Dates
    • What is ACCA

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

ACCA F9 Relevant cash flows for DCF Taxation (example 4)

VIVA

ACCA Financial Management lectures Download FM notes


Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. petriep says

    July 21, 2018 at 8:53 pm

    Thanks a million John!!! Excellent lecture, now I understand.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      July 22, 2018 at 9:12 am

      Thank you for your comment 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
  2. John Moffat says

    June 23, 2018 at 2:50 pm

    The tax saving is a year in arrears also, as I explain in the lecture.

    Log in to Reply
  3. samanthashepherd says

    May 22, 2018 at 7:50 pm

    The NPV in the video and the lecture notes are wrong :/

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      May 23, 2018 at 7:29 am

      And presumably you worked through the example at the same time and realised where the error was in the lecture?

      There is a tiny addition mistake in adding up the year 3 flows in the lecture. I will re-record it when I have time, but it is a minor mistake and pretty obvious.

      The answer in the lecture notes is correct.

      Log in to Reply
      • bercia says

        September 23, 2018 at 12:30 am

        NPV in notes is not adding up to 6,695 but to 7,103 or am I doing something wrong?

      • John Moffat says

        September 23, 2018 at 8:03 am

        Read my reply immediately above your post!!!!

  4. khanhhoangvu says

    December 8, 2017 at 7:34 am

    Dear Sir

    Why didn’t you mention the relating yearly depreciation of new machine? I think, when we buy new machine, we have to take account yearly depreciation expense into the cash flows of project.

    is the depreciation expensive irrelevant to the project’s cash flows? If depreciation expensive is relevant to the cash flows, how do we deals with ? we add or subtract depreciation expensive into cash flows. I were really confused depreciation expenses relating to the project’s cash flows and i didn’t how to treat it well. Could you please explain and make me clear.

    moreover, you mentioned in the lecture as follows: “Capital allowance another word is tax allowable depreciation” so, is there any difference between the Capital allowance and the depreciation expense? are they the same.

    Please help me clear.

    Thank you Sir in advance

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      December 8, 2017 at 4:43 pm

      Depreciation is not a cash flow, and with NPV calculations we are only looking at cash flows.

      The tax authorities have their own rules for tax allowable depreciation (which is not the same as the accounting depreciation) and the rules are always given in exam questions. Again, it is not a cash flow, but it does reduce the taxable profit and therefore save tax (and tax itself is obviously a cash flow).

      Have you not watched the earlier lectures?

      Log in to Reply
  5. togwe says

    November 19, 2017 at 1:26 pm

    I think they is an error calculating the net cashflow for yr 3 (8000+563+1000+6000-2100)=$13463. You have a different figure.

    Thanks

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 19, 2017 at 7:09 pm

      You are correct – thanks – I must re-record the lecture.

      However the answer in the lecture notes is correct 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
  6. zaidmdjalil says

    November 10, 2017 at 6:34 pm

    capital allowances are similar to depn, but a depn is a non cash expense, so how can we show them in the operating cash flows??

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 10, 2017 at 6:46 pm

      We don’t, and I don’t in my lectures either!!!

      Capital allowances do however reduce the taxable profit and therefore result in a saving of tax. Tax is of course a cash flow!

      Log in to Reply
  7. theodoor says

    September 24, 2017 at 9:24 pm

    Dear Sir,

    I am not quit sure why we assume to be taxed on the cost of $10’000 in period 1.
    Shouldn’t costs not be taxed?

    Thank you for your reply.

    Regards

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      September 25, 2017 at 7:40 am

      We are not paying tax on the cost. The cost gets tax allowable depreciation (capital allowances) each year, and we save tax was a result.

      Log in to Reply
  8. mikoyems19 says

    September 9, 2017 at 11:57 am

    Thank you very much for this lecture. This has been giving issues for long. However, I’m confused as to why you didn’t calculate annual allowance when considering the capital allowance. Please elaborate. Thanks in anticipation.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      September 9, 2017 at 1:51 pm

      The capital allowance is annual (at 25% reducing balance) and I did calculate it (and then the tax saving resulting from it). There is no other allowance (apart from the balancing allowance or balancing charge when the asset is sold).

      Log in to Reply
      • mikoyems19 says

        September 12, 2017 at 11:24 am

        Thank you John.

        I actually meant initial allowance. Thank you very much. You rock.

      • John Moffat says

        September 12, 2017 at 1:01 pm

        There is rarely an initial allowance in F9, but if there is then the question will specifically tell you.

        (And thank you for the comment 馃檪 )

  9. caroline22 says

    June 8, 2017 at 9:29 pm

    hello,

    example 4 i get a different answer, i get +7103 as the NPV, using -11000+4545+5163+10111-1716, have i missed something or miscalculated something.

    thanks

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      June 9, 2017 at 7:42 am

      You are correct – I must re-record the lecture. Thank you for noticing 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
  10. ashishramnani1 says

    March 4, 2017 at 2:30 pm

    Hello,Sir.
    Your lectures are extremely comprehensible and I’ve learnt a lot of things that I didn’t know about.I just have a quick question,how would we treat the capital allowances if they were on a straight line basis rather than on a reducing balance basis?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      March 4, 2017 at 2:53 pm

      In exactly the same, except that it is easier because the capital allowance is an equal amount each year.

      Log in to Reply
  11. Kiara says

    February 17, 2016 at 11:56 pm

    Sir,
    I have two questions;
    1) If the project is acquiring a company, will we still calculate a balancing charge/allowance?
    2) My capital allowances on NCAs are (in millions) :
    2016 – 拢351.96
    2017 – 拢326.40
    2018 – 拢316.61
    2019- 拢307.11

    Both tax payments and capital allowance claims occur one year in arrears.
    I’m confused as to when will the first tax saving occur?

    Also,
    The project life is 2016-19.

    Thank you!

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      February 18, 2016 at 7:32 am

      You must ask this sort of question in the F9 Ask the Tutor Forum, and not as a comment on a lecture.

      Log in to Reply
      • Kiara says

        February 18, 2016 at 5:01 pm

        My apologies, will do so.

  12. Kelly says

    November 14, 2015 at 3:25 pm

    Thank you for a wonderful lecture Sir. This may sound a bit silly but I am failing to understand why the tax saving only starts in year 2. This is my thinking,we bought the machine in Year 0. at the end of which we will calculate the capital allowance. however the tax is to be paid in arrears so we will make the saving at the end of year 1.

    In any case I thought to say the tax is on the net operating cashflows. Tax on the first year flow will be paid in year 2. Therefore we can match the saving to the operating flows. Is it a logical assumption, would it prove true in any other situation?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 14, 2015 at 3:47 pm

      There is no such thing as year 0. It is time 0, and time 0, time 1 etc are points in time that are 1 year apart (so that we are able to discount in whole years).

      Time 0 is the start of the first year.
      Time 1 is the end of the first year – because it is one year later (we are not bothered about the odd day).
      Time 1 is also the start of the second year (again, we are not worried about the odd day when is comes to discounting).
      Time 2 is the end of the second year and the start of the third year.
      And so on…..

      For operating flows (revenue and expenses) we always assume (unless the question says different) that they occur at the ends of years.
      So the first years revenue is at the end of the first year – which is time 1.

      For capital allowances, the initial investment is at the start of the first year (time 0).
      The first allowance will be calculated at the end of the first year (time 1). If the question says that tax is payable immediately, then the tax effect will therefore also be at time 1.

      However, if the question says that there is a 1 year delay in tax, then although the allowance will have been calculated at time 1, the actual tax effect will be one year later at time 2.

      Log in to Reply
      • Kelly says

        November 17, 2015 at 6:47 am

        Crystal. Many thanks Sir.

      • John Moffat says

        November 17, 2015 at 8:25 am

        You are welcome 馃檪

      • karlinnee says

        March 20, 2016 at 6:29 pm

        Had the same issue and question, now it’s clear, thank you!

      • John Moffat says

        March 20, 2016 at 7:53 pm

        Great 馃檪

      • SamTallroth says

        October 31, 2016 at 8:14 pm

        Same issue for me to, understand perfectly now!

      • shaneg1989 says

        August 15, 2017 at 5:36 am

        JOHN :
        However, if the question says that there is a 1 year delay in tax, then although the allowance will have been calculated at time 1, the actual tax effect will be one year later at time 2.

        ME :
        Does this mean that because of the 1 year delay in tax payment, there is also a 1 year delay in cashflow(tax payment) so the corresponding allowance would be delayed 1 year also in order to match the cashflow(tax payment) because effectively the allowance is a savings on the cashflow(tax payment)…..

      • John Moffat says

        August 15, 2017 at 6:04 am

        Yes 馃檪

      • shaneg1989 says

        August 15, 2017 at 10:23 pm

        Thank you Mr. Moffat
        This has been so helpful to me

      • John Moffat says

        August 16, 2017 at 9:36 am

        You are very welcome 馃檪

« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 路 Support 路 Contact 路 Advertising 路 OpenLicense 路 About 路 Sitemap 路 Comments 路 Log in