hi John! you are the best! I love your paste with passion. however, i’ld like to know when best to include depreciation in cash flow like in this example again ( I mean should it only be when it affects tax?). in addition, can you give some other examples of items (other than depreciation)that are not relevant cash flow.
The question says that 20% of overheads are absorbed (charged) to the new project, but this does not mean that the total overheads increase. We are only interested in any extra cash flows as a result of doing the project, so if the total overheads do not change then there is no extra cash flow.
But why? Although there will be a general rate of inflation in a country, that is only an average – not everything will inflate at the same rate. Think about oil prices – sometimes they go up more than other goods – sometimes the go up less than other goods.
My question is if the net operating flow was a loss, i.e. a negative value (401) in the first year how would we deal with the tax on operating flows and in tax savings on capital allowances for the next year?
We always assume (in Paper F9) that the company is already making profits from other projects and is therefore already paying tax.
Therefore if the operating flows from this project are negative then it will save tax (because the total profit of the business will be lower).
So we deal with the tax on operating profits in exactly the same way as always – if there is a positive operating flow then there is a tax outflow; if there is a negative operating flow then there is a tax inflow.
Capital allowances are not affected – the tax savings on them will be the same whatever happens.
If the are extra (incremental) overheads payable by the company as a result of doing the project, then it is a relevant cash outflow (of the extra amount) when getting the net cash flows each year.
Why is the material cost 864 in the first year and not 800? Wouldnt you buy the material on day one so therefore there would be no inflation in a day hence why Im confused why we do not use 800.
The lecture is saying if we do buy the machine it would be next year that we would buy the material, but if we decide to go ahead with the project and buy the machine tomorrow then wouldnt we then buy the material tomorrow aswell so therefore no inflation?
We assume that the price increases on the first day of each new year. It may be impractical, but that is the assumption we make. Also, the term “current prices” automatically always means in the exam that in one year it will inflate by one year, two years inflation in two years time, etc..
You would ignore it because it is not a cash flow. (Depreciation is always ignored. Capital allowances are only considered because of the affect on the tax.)
Have you watched the previous lectures, because I spend time on the timing of the cash flows in them.
It is not ‘year 0’ it is time 0, which is a point in time. Time 0 is ‘now – the start of the first year. Time 1 is one year from now – the end of the first year / start of the second year, and so on.
We always assume that operating cash flows occur at the ends of year (unless told differently in the question), so although we will be buying materials throughout the first year, we assume that the cash flow occurs at then end of the first year i.e. at time 1.
yes, i have watched the previous lecture. i got your point now, i have figure out the where i have made a mess, the mess was on different between time0 and year o. you made it very clear now. thank you so much for your kind reply. its so nice of u . thumbs up…:)
in the NPV calculation, for discount factor calculation what do we use if we have given only real cost of capital 5.7%
inflation is 5%
do we use the formula (1+nominal rate)=(1+real rate)x(1+inflation rate), i used this formula but still does not give a round % to use for discount factor.
The lectures are all working fine, so the problem is definitely at your end. Best is to go to the support page (the link to it is above). If the suggestions there do not sort out the problem then leave another message on that page and admin will try and help you.
With regard to a general inflation rate it is impossible to know for certain but countries do make ‘predictions’ and so we would have to use that.
With regard however to the inflation applicable to specific flows, then it is really down to estimates.
It is impossible to predict inflation precisely (just as it is impossible to be able to predict cash flows precisely, even without inflation). All decisions have to be based on estimates and therefore it is impossible to make ‘perfect’ decisions.
i apologize for asking this silly question umm for capital allowance why is it not written in year 1 column ? it starts from the first year till it is sold so why it’s not written in year 1-3 ?
sorry i should have read the question carefully it is mentioned in question that the new product will be sold 20p.u in the first year…sorry my mistake…
We always assume that the business is already making profits from other sources, and is therefore already paying tax.
As a result, a ‘loss’ in any year from this investment isn’t really a loss, it simply reduces the profits they are already making and therefore saves tax they would otherwise have been paying.
Hey John, Here is a confusion with Bpp question for inflation:
I figured-out everything almost correct somewhere, but the working capital is really disturbing me. I share you portion of the question and also answer for that portion:
Inc/Dec. in working capitals are as follows: Year 0: 20×3= +20000 Year 1: 20×4= +10000 Year 2: 20×5= -15000 Year 3: 20×5= -15000
The inflation is to be increased by 10%( applied to 20×4 and onwards). The project is 3years.
What I did: 20×3 year forward to 20×4= 30000 * 1.10 = 33000 ( this is correct) BUT 20×5 = -15000 * 1.10 = -16500 +33000 = 16500 ( Incorrect ) same for 20×6
I will answer, but please post questions like this in the Ask the Tutor Forum for Paper F9 – not here, which is for comments on the lecture.
Without inflation, the requirement at time 2 is 15,000. But there will be two years inflation at 10%, so the actual requirement will be 15,000 x 1.1 x 1.1 = 18150. (you have only inflated it for one year, but there will be two years inflation)
Fixed overheads are only relevant if the total changes. Simply absorbing (or charging) the total fixed overheads differently does not mean that the total changes. I do stress this in my lecture.
hi John! you are the best! I love your paste with passion.
however, i’ld like to know when best to include depreciation in cash flow like in this example again ( I mean should it only be when it affects tax?).
in addition, can you give some other examples of items (other than depreciation)that are not relevant cash flow.
thanks a million
As far as the exam is concerned, it is only depreciation that you need to worry about 馃檪
hello
in this example 4 chapter 8 i got a question.
why in the cash flow you did not include the 20% from the overheads?
I do actually explain in the lecture.
The question says that 20% of overheads are absorbed (charged) to the new project, but this does not mean that the total overheads increase. We are only interested in any extra cash flows as a result of doing the project, so if the total overheads do not change then there is no extra cash flow.
Dear John,
I am a little confused that the inflation rate for labour is different than the one for material. Should the rate not be equal for the same period?
Kind regards
Jens
But why? Although there will be a general rate of inflation in a country, that is only an average – not everything will inflate at the same rate. Think about oil prices – sometimes they go up more than other goods – sometimes the go up less than other goods.
Great lecture Sir.
My question is if the net operating flow was a loss, i.e. a negative value (401) in the first year how would we deal with the tax on operating flows and in tax savings on capital allowances for the next year?
Thanks in advance.
SALI
We always assume (in Paper F9) that the company is already making profits from other projects and is therefore already paying tax.
Therefore if the operating flows from this project are negative then it will save tax (because the total profit of the business will be lower).
So we deal with the tax on operating profits in exactly the same way as always – if there is a positive operating flow then there is a tax outflow; if there is a negative operating flow then there is a tax inflow.
Capital allowances are not affected – the tax savings on them will be the same whatever happens.
I got it. Thanks Sir.?
You are welcome 馃檪
sir what do we need to do if we got extra overheads relevant to this project
If the are extra (incremental) overheads payable by the company as a result of doing the project, then it is a relevant cash outflow (of the extra amount) when getting the net cash flows each year.
hello,
Why is the material cost 864 in the first year and not 800? Wouldnt you buy the material on day one so therefore there would be no inflation in a day hence why Im confused why we do not use 800.
The lecture is saying if we do buy the machine it would be next year that we would buy the material, but if we decide to go ahead with the project and buy the machine tomorrow then wouldnt we then buy the material tomorrow aswell so therefore no inflation?
We assume that the price increases on the first day of each new year. It may be impractical, but that is the assumption we make.
Also, the term “current prices” automatically always means in the exam that in one year it will inflate by one year, two years inflation in two years time, etc..
what would you do with depreciation if there was no capital allowances?
You would ignore it because it is not a cash flow.
(Depreciation is always ignored. Capital allowances are only considered because of the affect on the tax.)
so say for example the question said depreciation is absorbed into the fixed costs, would you have to take away depreciation from the fixed costs?
Yes – you would. We are only concerned with cash flows and depreciation is not a cash flow.
Hello sir
one things i am confuse about is , if we dont buy the material now on year 0, then how we gonna produce the product to sale on year 1?
Have you watched the previous lectures, because I spend time on the timing of the cash flows in them.
It is not ‘year 0’ it is time 0, which is a point in time. Time 0 is ‘now – the start of the first year. Time 1 is one year from now – the end of the first year / start of the second year, and so on.
We always assume that operating cash flows occur at the ends of year (unless told differently in the question), so although we will be buying materials throughout the first year, we assume that the cash flow occurs at then end of the first year i.e. at time 1.
yes, i have watched the previous lecture. i got your point now, i have figure out the where i have made a mess, the mess was on different between time0 and year o. you made it very clear now. thank you so much for your kind reply. its so nice of u . thumbs up…:)
in the NPV calculation, for discount factor calculation what do we use if we have given only real cost of capital 5.7%
inflation is 5%
do we use the formula (1+nominal rate)=(1+real rate)x(1+inflation rate), i used this formula but still does not give a round % to use for discount factor.
Thank you
In that case you would discount using the nearest % – the examiner expects you to use tables rather than calculate the discount factors exactly.
However it is very unusual to be asked to use real rates. Usually we inflate the flows and then discount at the actual cost of capital
Thank you so much
Thank you John for this beautiful Lecture.
Serious problem:
I have been trying for 2 days, 5 hours in total, but cannot watch any of the lectures. The rest of the site is doing fine.
On my Google Chrome browser, I have increased the font size as otherwise I get a headache. Could that be the problem?
What can I do?
PLEASE HELP !!
The lectures are all working fine, so the problem is definitely at your end.
Best is to go to the support page (the link to it is above). If the suggestions there do not sort out the problem then leave another message on that page and admin will try and help you.
Thanks
Sir i want to ask from where we can get inflation rate which we can use for our investment appraisals in real practical life?
Well…..there are really two answers to this.
With regard to a general inflation rate it is impossible to know for certain but countries do make ‘predictions’ and so we would have to use that.
With regard however to the inflation applicable to specific flows, then it is really down to estimates.
It is impossible to predict inflation precisely (just as it is impossible to be able to predict cash flows precisely, even without inflation). All decisions have to be based on estimates and therefore it is impossible to make ‘perfect’ decisions.
thanks Sir I got it now.
i apologize for asking this silly question umm for capital allowance why is it not written in year 1 column ? it starts from the first year till it is sold so why it’s not written in year 1-3 ?
The first capital allowances are indeed calculated at the end of the first year (i.e. time 1).
However, the second to last line of the question says that the tax is 1 year in arrears.
As a result, the benefit of the capital allowances will not occur until 1 year later – i.e. time 2.
why you did not incorporate inflation in year 1 for sales?… its a little bit confusing point for me otherwise great lecture …..
sorry i should have read the question carefully it is mentioned in question that the new product will be sold 20p.u in the first year…sorry my mistake…
Mr Moffat, I’m confused about tax. Please, could you clarify for me how tax savings can be more than tax paid? What does it mean in real life?
We always assume that the business is already making profits from other sources, and is therefore already paying tax.
As a result, a ‘loss’ in any year from this investment isn’t really a loss, it simply reduces the profits they are already making and therefore saves tax they would otherwise have been paying.
Hey John,
Here is a confusion with Bpp question for inflation:
I figured-out everything almost correct somewhere, but the working capital is really disturbing me. I share you portion of the question and also answer for that portion:
Inc/Dec. in working capitals are as follows:
Year 0: 20×3= +20000
Year 1: 20×4= +10000
Year 2: 20×5= -15000
Year 3: 20×5= -15000
The inflation is to be increased by 10%( applied to 20×4 and onwards). The project is 3years.
What I did:
20×3 year forward to 20×4= 30000 * 1.10 = 33000 ( this is correct)
BUT
20×5 = -15000 * 1.10 = -16500 +33000 = 16500 ( Incorrect )
same for 20×6
What Book did:
20×3 20×4 20×5 20×6
$ $ $ $
Investment @20X3 prices 20,000 30,000 15,000 0
Investment @inflated prices 20,000 33,000 18,150 0
Year Move @inflated prices (20,000) (13,000) 14,850 18150
I am curious how 18150 and onward figures arrive 馃檨
Many Thanks
Oops I think this part is confusing to read: WHAT BOOK DID:
I’m doing it again here for easy reading:
I’m convinced for till year 20X4, lets start onward periods;
20X5:
Investment @20X3 prices: $15000
Investment @inflated prices: $18150
Year Move @inflated prices: $14850
20X6:
Investment @20X3 prices: $0
Investment @inflated prices: $0
Year Move @inflated prices: $18150
I will answer, but please post questions like this in the Ask the Tutor Forum for Paper F9 – not here, which is for comments on the lecture.
Without inflation, the requirement at time 2 is 15,000.
But there will be two years inflation at 10%, so the actual requirement will be 15,000 x 1.1 x 1.1 = 18150.
(you have only inflated it for one year, but there will be two years inflation)
ok cool! Thanks 馃檪
Hi Sir,
I Can’t Understand Why you have not Treated with FIXED OVERHEADS in this Calculation?
Fixed overheads are only relevant if the total changes. Simply absorbing (or charging) the total fixed overheads differently does not mean that the total changes.
I do stress this in my lecture.
Hi Sir, I got a bit confused and did not understand the last bit of this lecture regarding the loss relief?
I was just saying that for F9, loss relief is not relevant.
If they make profits they pay tax, if they make losses they save tax.
So, for yr 1, the adjusted profit is 401 and C.A of 700, hence the tax savings of 75, how about for year 2? Is it a loss or profit?
Is what a loss or a profit? Why do you care anyway?
In year 1 there is a cash profit of 401 and so tax payable of 100 at time 2.
There is tax saving from capital allowances at time 2 of 175.
In year 2 there is a cash profit of 435 and so the tax on this is 109 payable at time 2.
There is also a tax saving from capital allowances of 131.
Fantastic Lecture! 馃檪
Such a clear lecture from a great lecturer!! Many, many thanks.