• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
    • BT
    • MA
    • FA
    • LW
    • PM
    • TX-UK
    • FR
    • AA
    • FM
    • SBL
    • SBR
    • AAA
    • AFM
    • APM
    • ATX
    • Dates
    • What is ACCA

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

ACCA F7 Inter-entity Transactions: Dividends Example 4

VIVA

ACCA F7 lectures  Download F7 notes


Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. shunjie21 says

    February 3, 2018 at 2:15 pm

    I can’t find the video on share for share exchange in chapter 8. After the video on dividends it moves to chapter 9

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      February 3, 2018 at 4:31 pm

      I go through an example step by step in those course notes!

      Log in to Reply
  2. rosanam88 says

    November 10, 2017 at 6:59 pm

    Dear Sir Mike,

    Kindly explain why we should include proposed dividend payable & receivable when we calculate consolidation retained earnings. shouldn’t be eliminated since it’s inter entity transaction.

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      November 11, 2017 at 6:13 am

      The receivable and the payable are eliminated but we can only eliminate when we are in the position of having recognised

      And we have to recognise because, within the dividend payable amount is the dividend related to the nci

      And during the process of elimination, only the element of the parent’s share is eliminated from the payable figure leaving the amount attributable to the nci as a liability

      In addition, if we don’t process the dividend, that means that retained earnings in the two entities are incorrect

      Cancellation is merely a presentation exercise to remove the idea that we can have an amount payable to ourselves. But the entry should still be made because that dividend IS a payable and IS a receivable

      When putting through the entries for the two entities, retained earnings are reduced and payables increased (for the subsidiary) whilst retained earnings are increased and receivables are increased (for the parent).

      It’s only the receivable that is cancelled against a (large) part of the payables, but the retained earnings figure isn’t eliminated

      Better?

      Log in to Reply
      • rosanam88 says

        November 11, 2017 at 5:33 pm

        Got it, Sir. Many thanks. Enjoying your lecture 🙂

  3. David says

    March 11, 2017 at 11:37 am

    Hi Mike,

    I was reading a financial book published in 2007, stating that companies may wish not to consolidate if they believe it’s misleading due to the “control” only being” temporary” or because the businesses are “Heterogeneous”. Does that still apply today? and if so where can I find more material about that. Thanks.

    Regards,

    David

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      March 11, 2017 at 11:48 am

      No, it certainly does NOT apply today

      IFRS3 revised stops it (as well as IFRS 10, 11 and 12)

      Log in to Reply
  4. vandananair says

    March 6, 2017 at 9:33 am

    Sir why do we have to cancel 9 receivables in Laimonas against 9 of the 10 payables in Kristine, leaving 1 payable in Kristine.I did not get that part

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      March 6, 2017 at 10:58 am

      Because, when we consolidat, we are showing the group as a single entity so 9 of that 10 dividend is payable by “ourselves” to “ourselves” and that would be stupid!

      OK?

      Log in to Reply
      • vandananair says

        March 6, 2017 at 1:08 pm

        Thank you sir. Sorry for troubling you over such a silly question i was tensed so i couldn’t make sense of what was happening.

  5. Daina says

    February 18, 2017 at 5:20 pm

    Dear all,

    MINI EXERCISES
    10 Goodwill
    13

    Where does 100 appear from?
    Ret ears 6 months (6/12 x $(4,700 – 100))

    Many thanks!

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      February 18, 2017 at 9:10 pm

      Post this on the Ask ACCA Tutor forum, please.

      It doesn’t belong in the section reserved for comments on the lecture

      I’ll get back to you tomorrow

      Log in to Reply
  6. natty2 says

    November 17, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    In the CA & Re ear account I do not understand where you got the 9000 from is it the liability you used to add to the CA a/c & RE ear A/C

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      November 17, 2016 at 5:01 pm

      Isn’t it 90% of a $10,000 dividend proposed by the subsidiary? And the parent owns 90% of the subsidiary

      So the parent is accounting for the receivability of their share of that $10,000 proposed subsidiary dividend

      OK?

      Log in to Reply
  7. riddles says

    November 15, 2016 at 1:28 pm

    Why doesn’t the subsidiary get the 10% of dividend issued by the parent?

    While the parent did get 90% of the dividend issued by the subsidiary?

    Log in to Reply
    • riddles says

      November 15, 2016 at 3:09 pm

      I watched the next lecture, the one about the Comprehensive example, you sorted this question out in that video 🙂 Thankyou

      Log in to Reply
  8. silvia748 says

    October 4, 2016 at 6:51 pm

    Not related to this lecture, if you are not given number of share how can you find out nci at date of acquisition if parent aquired 75% of subsidery for $2,000,000 and share price is $4.04?

    Log in to Reply
    • silvia748 says

      October 4, 2016 at 7:06 pm

      i found the answer

      Log in to Reply
      • MikeLittle says

        October 4, 2016 at 10:06 pm

        You’re always given the number of shares in the subsidiary!

        Always!

  9. lenamisiri says

    July 29, 2016 at 2:52 am

    Last illustration Chapter 8. How did you determine the present value ,10% of 1.10 payable.

    Log in to Reply
    • lenamisiri says

      July 29, 2016 at 5:01 am

      Don’t bother to respond. I got the solution. Simply algebra. Linear equation.

      Log in to Reply
  10. chiranjeev says

    May 24, 2016 at 8:06 pm

    Hello Sir
    I have few queries
    1. Why we cut the Dividend from Current Asset?
    Because it is an adjustment so there must be double entry that we have to show in the exam as well…
    2. Can we add the Dividend’s share of NCI in their workings as well?

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      May 25, 2016 at 8:11 am

      When we ignore the current asset of dividend receivable from a related company (subsidiary or associate) in double entry terms, that’s a credit

      The debit is against the parent company’s investment income on the statement of profit or loss

      “Can we add the Dividend’s share of NCI in their workings as well?” is this the same as “Can we add the NCI’s share of Dividend in their workings as well?

      The answer is NO!

      The dividend from any company is paid as an appropriation of profits. It is not an expense of the year to be deducted in arriving at net profits

      If you’re going to give the NCI their share of …..

      this year’s
      subsidiary
      adjusted
      time-apportioned
      profit after tax

      then you’re crediting them with those profits out of which the subsidiary is then going to deduct the dividend

      To credit the NCI separately with their share of dividend (or even to credit the DIVIDEND with their share of NCI :-)) will be to double count

      Is that ok?

      Log in to Reply
  11. utkurjon says

    May 16, 2016 at 10:46 am

    Dear Mike,

    As always thank you very much for great lectures.
    Could you please explain why we do not take off that £9,000 from Retained Earnings as well when we cancel Receivables in P against Payables in S, i.e. how can we have that $9,000 included in P’s Retained Earnings when we are not going receive it (because we cancelled receivables for that figure).

    Many thanks in advance.

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      May 16, 2016 at 8:15 pm

      Cancellation is a tidying up exercise. The parent IS going to receive it and, in the parent’s own accounting records, it will record the receipt of the dividend as:

      Dr Cash 9,000
      Cr Investment Income (and then to SoPorL) 9,000

      Log in to Reply
      • utkurjon says

        May 16, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        Thanks so much.

  12. Ayesha says

    February 3, 2016 at 2:39 am

    Dear Mike, i cant find this example in lecture notes.

    Log in to Reply
    • Ayesha says

      February 3, 2016 at 2:56 am

      i found it. sorry for hassle

      Log in to Reply
    • williengo says

      April 7, 2016 at 7:06 am

      Hi Mike, Page 54, where do you get 55,500? Is the cost of the investiment not 55,900 ie
      (6000+33000+14400+2500)?

      Log in to Reply
      • williengo says

        April 7, 2016 at 7:43 am

        you answered this already in ask the tutor. Many thanks.

      • MikeLittle says

        April 7, 2016 at 8:41 am

        So please don’t multiple post! If you post it in Ask the Tutor, I SHALL answer it because I SHALL see it. But I also keep an occasional eye out in the Latest Comments and, if I see anything there of relevance to my papers, I read those comments too

        That means that, like now, I have the same question in front of me. Please, if you want an answer, post only on Ask the Tutor. Do NOT multiple post

        If it’s a question not for me, then post in the general forum

        Thanks

  13. Kashia says

    November 5, 2015 at 8:57 am

    I think I am missing a figure? Where is the $9000 proposed dividend for Laimonas?

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      November 7, 2015 at 8:06 am

      Is it possibly 90% of Asta’s $10,000 proposed dividend?

      Log in to Reply
  14. Olga says

    May 22, 2015 at 12:05 pm

    MINI EXERCISE
    10 GOODWILL
    Answer 16

    Mike, could you please also explain, why in answer in FV of SNA @doa stands:

    Ret earnings b/F 1500
    Ret earnings 6 months 1000

    Shouldn’t it be 3500 and 500 respectively?

    Thanks!!!

    Log in to Reply
  15. Olga says

    May 22, 2015 at 9:43 am

    Dear Mike!
    I have a question regarding mini exercises.
    MINI EXERCISE
    10 GOODWILL
    Answer 8

    I don’t understand, from where comes addition 2000 in the line:

    Ret earnings 6 months (21000+2000)/2

    So 21000/2 is RE from 1 Oct 2008 till 1 Apt 2009, and what is 2000?

    Thank you!

    Log in to Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in